Interprofessional education for healthcare professionals. A BEME realist review of what works, why, for whom and in what circumstances in undergraduate health sciences education: BEME Guide No. 83.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2314203
Demi Krystallidou, Maria J Kersbergen, Esther de Groot, Cornelia R M G Fluit, Wietske Kuijer-Siebelink, Fien Mertens, Saskia C M Oosterbaan-Lodder, Nynke Scherpbier, Marco A C Versluis, Peter Pype
{"title":"Interprofessional education for healthcare professionals. A BEME realist review of what works, why, for whom and in what circumstances in undergraduate health sciences education: BEME Guide No. 83.","authors":"Demi Krystallidou, Maria J Kersbergen, Esther de Groot, Cornelia R M G Fluit, Wietske Kuijer-Siebelink, Fien Mertens, Saskia C M Oosterbaan-Lodder, Nynke Scherpbier, Marco A C Versluis, Peter Pype","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2314203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To provide an evidence-informed program theory (PT) for Interprofessional Education (IPE) that adds to the knowledge base of how IPE in undergraduate health sciences education works.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a realist review of the literature and synthesis of the evidence combined with stakeholder experience. Our initial program theory (IPT), built around development, delivery and evaluation of IPE interventions, was tested and refined following an in-depth search of the literature and consultation with stakeholders. The literature (2010-2022) was selected based on the realist criteria of <i>relevance</i> and <i>rigor</i>, as well as on conceptual richness of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our PT is built upon 124 CMOs (Context of IPE interventions, Mechanisms that fired within that context, and IPE Outcomes), from 58 studies. Our PT comprises an array of elements found in the Context, including traits and behavioral displays of students and facilitators, and discusses four Mechanisms (<i>feeling responsible, feeling enthusiastic/excited, feeling safe to take risks</i>, and <i>feeling ready)</i>, which are likely to lead to outcomes related to the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (sub)competencies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results were linked to learning theories to further build our understanding. The PT can serve as a guide for the development, delivery, and evaluation of IPE interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1607-1624"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2314203","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To provide an evidence-informed program theory (PT) for Interprofessional Education (IPE) that adds to the knowledge base of how IPE in undergraduate health sciences education works.

Methods: We undertook a realist review of the literature and synthesis of the evidence combined with stakeholder experience. Our initial program theory (IPT), built around development, delivery and evaluation of IPE interventions, was tested and refined following an in-depth search of the literature and consultation with stakeholders. The literature (2010-2022) was selected based on the realist criteria of relevance and rigor, as well as on conceptual richness of the studies.

Results: Our PT is built upon 124 CMOs (Context of IPE interventions, Mechanisms that fired within that context, and IPE Outcomes), from 58 studies. Our PT comprises an array of elements found in the Context, including traits and behavioral displays of students and facilitators, and discusses four Mechanisms (feeling responsible, feeling enthusiastic/excited, feeling safe to take risks, and feeling ready), which are likely to lead to outcomes related to the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (sub)competencies.

Discussion: Results were linked to learning theories to further build our understanding. The PT can serve as a guide for the development, delivery, and evaluation of IPE interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健专业人员的跨专业教育。BEME对本科健康科学教育中什么有效、为什么有效、对谁有效以及在什么情况下有效进行了现实主义审查:BEME指南第83号。
目的:为跨专业教育(IPE)提供有实证依据的课程理论(PT),以增加本科健康科学教育中 IPE 如何运作的知识库:我们对文献进行了现实主义审查,并结合利益相关者的经验对证据进行了综合。我们的初步计划理论(IPT)围绕 IPE 干预措施的开发、实施和评估展开,在对文献进行深入检索并咨询利益相关者后,对该理论进行了检验和完善。文献(2010-2022 年)的选择基于现实主义的相关性和严谨性标准,以及研究的概念丰富性:我们的 PT 基于 58 项研究中的 124 个 CMO(IPE 干预的背景、在此背景下启动的机制和 IPE 成果)。我们的PT包含了 "背景 "中的一系列要素,包括学生和促进者的特质和行为表现,并讨论了四种机制(感觉有责任感、感觉热情/兴奋、感觉有承担风险的安全感以及感觉准备就绪),这可能会导致与跨专业教育合作(子)能力相关的结果:讨论:研究结果与学习理论相联系,以进一步加深我们的理解。PT可作为跨专业教育干预措施的开发、实施和评估指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
A randomised cross-over trial assessing the impact of AI-generated individual feedback on written online assignments for medical students. Assessing readability of explanations and reliability of answers by GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in non-traumatic spinal cord injury education. Balancing innovation and tradition: A critical reflection on the assessment PROFILE framework. Response to: "Rethinking peer evaluation in team-based learning". Response to: 'A confidentiality conundrum: Case tracking for medical education'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1