Consensus on managing open ankle fractures in the frail patient.

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Open Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0155.R1
Enis Guryel, Jo McEwan, Amir A Qureshi, Alastair Robertson, Raju Ahluwalia, Mark Baxter, Lyndon Mason, Will Eardley, Iain McFadyen, Alex Trompeter, Anna V Giblin, Bob Handley, Om Lahoti
{"title":"Consensus on managing open ankle fractures in the frail patient.","authors":"Enis Guryel, Jo McEwan, Amir A Qureshi, Alastair Robertson, Raju Ahluwalia, Mark Baxter, Lyndon Mason, Will Eardley, Iain McFadyen, Alex Trompeter, Anna V Giblin, Bob Handley, Om Lahoti","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0155.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Ankle fractures are common injuries and the third most common fragility fracture. In all, 40% of ankle fractures in the frail are open and represent a complex clinical scenario, with morbidity and mortality rates similar to hip fracture patients. They have a higher risk of complications, such as wound infections, malunion, hospital-acquired infections, pressure sores, veno-thromboembolic events, and significant sarcopaenia from prolonged bed rest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi method was used and a group of experts with a vested interest in best practice were invited from the British Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS), British Orthopaedic Association (BOA), Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS), British Association of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeons (BAPRAS), British Geriatric Society (BGS), and the British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first stage, there were 36 respondents to the survey, with over 70% stating their unit treats more than 20 such cases per year. There was a 50:50 split regarding if the timing of surgery should be within 36 hours, as per the hip fracture guidelines, or 72 hours, as per the open fracture guidelines. Overall, 75% would attempt primary wound closure and 25% would utilize a local flap. There was no orthopaedic agreement on fixation, and 75% would permit weightbearing immediately. In the second stage, performed at the BLRS meeting, experts discussed the survey results and agreed upon a consensus for the management of open elderly ankle fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A mutually agreed consensus from the expert panel was reached to enable the best practice for the management of patients with frailty with an open ankle fracture: 1) all units managing lower limb fragility fractures should do so through a cohorted multidisciplinary pathway. This pathway should follow the standards laid down in the \"care of the older or frail orthopaedic trauma patient\" British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guideline. These patients have low bone density, and we should recommend full falls and bone health assessment; 2) all open lower limb fragility fractures should be treated in a single stage within 24 hours of injury if possible; 3) all patients with fragility fractures of the lower limb should be considered for mobilisation on the day following surgery; 4) all patients with lower limb open fragility fractures should be considered for tissue sparing, with judicious debridement as a default; 5) all patients with open lower limb fragility fractures should be managed by a consultant plastic surgeon with primary closure wherever possible; and 6) the method of fixation must allow for immediate unrestricted weightbearing.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 3","pages":"236-242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0155.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Ankle fractures are common injuries and the third most common fragility fracture. In all, 40% of ankle fractures in the frail are open and represent a complex clinical scenario, with morbidity and mortality rates similar to hip fracture patients. They have a higher risk of complications, such as wound infections, malunion, hospital-acquired infections, pressure sores, veno-thromboembolic events, and significant sarcopaenia from prolonged bed rest.

Methods: A modified Delphi method was used and a group of experts with a vested interest in best practice were invited from the British Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS), British Orthopaedic Association (BOA), Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS), British Association of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeons (BAPRAS), British Geriatric Society (BGS), and the British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS).

Results: In the first stage, there were 36 respondents to the survey, with over 70% stating their unit treats more than 20 such cases per year. There was a 50:50 split regarding if the timing of surgery should be within 36 hours, as per the hip fracture guidelines, or 72 hours, as per the open fracture guidelines. Overall, 75% would attempt primary wound closure and 25% would utilize a local flap. There was no orthopaedic agreement on fixation, and 75% would permit weightbearing immediately. In the second stage, performed at the BLRS meeting, experts discussed the survey results and agreed upon a consensus for the management of open elderly ankle fractures.

Conclusion: A mutually agreed consensus from the expert panel was reached to enable the best practice for the management of patients with frailty with an open ankle fracture: 1) all units managing lower limb fragility fractures should do so through a cohorted multidisciplinary pathway. This pathway should follow the standards laid down in the "care of the older or frail orthopaedic trauma patient" British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guideline. These patients have low bone density, and we should recommend full falls and bone health assessment; 2) all open lower limb fragility fractures should be treated in a single stage within 24 hours of injury if possible; 3) all patients with fragility fractures of the lower limb should be considered for mobilisation on the day following surgery; 4) all patients with lower limb open fragility fractures should be considered for tissue sparing, with judicious debridement as a default; 5) all patients with open lower limb fragility fractures should be managed by a consultant plastic surgeon with primary closure wherever possible; and 6) the method of fixation must allow for immediate unrestricted weightbearing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于处理体弱患者开放性踝关节骨折的共识。
目的:踝关节骨折是常见的损伤,也是第三大最常见的脆性骨折。在体弱者中,40%的踝关节骨折为开放性骨折,临床表现复杂,发病率和死亡率与髋部骨折患者相似。他们发生并发症的风险较高,如伤口感染、愈合不良、医院感染、压疮、静脉血栓栓塞事件,以及因长期卧床而导致的严重肌营养不良:采用改良德尔菲法,从英国足踝协会(BOFAS)、英国矫形协会(BOA)、创伤矫形协会(OTS)、英国整形与重建外科医生协会(BAPRAS)、英国老年协会(BGS)和英国肢体重建协会(BLRS)邀请了一批对最佳实践感兴趣的专家:在第一阶段,共有 36 名受访者参与了调查,其中超过 70% 的受访者表示其所在单位每年处理的此类病例超过 20 例。关于手术时间是按照髋部骨折指南在 36 小时内进行,还是按照开放性骨折指南在 72 小时内进行的问题,受访者的意见各占一半。总的来说,75%的人会尝试进行初级伤口闭合,25%的人会使用局部皮瓣。骨科界对固定方法没有达成一致意见,75%的人会允许患者立即负重。第二阶段在 BLRS 会议上进行,专家们对调查结果进行了讨论,并就老年开放性踝关节骨折的处理达成了共识:结论:专家小组达成了共同认可的共识,为治疗开放性踝关节骨折的虚弱患者提供了最佳实践:1)所有处理下肢脆性骨折的单位都应通过多学科联合路径进行处理。该路径应遵循英国骨科协会创伤与骨科标准(BOAST)指南中规定的 "老年或体弱骨科创伤患者护理 "标准。这些患者的骨密度较低,我们应建议对其进行全面的跌倒和骨健康评估;2)如果可能,所有开放性下肢脆性骨折均应在受伤后 24 小时内进行一次性治疗;3)所有下肢脆性骨折患者均应考虑在术后第二天进行活动;4)所有下肢开放性脆性骨折患者均应考虑进行组织疏通,默认情况下应进行明智的清创;5)所有下肢开放性脆性骨折患者均应由整形外科顾问医生进行处理,并尽可能进行初次闭合;6)固定方法必须允许患者立即不受限制地负重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus arthroscopic Latarjet for anterior shoulder instability in adolescents. Revisiting the radiological signs for the first metatarsal pronation assessment. Clinical outcomes after extra-articular resection of hip joint tumour using a custom-made osteotomy guide and 3D-printed endoprosthesis with posterior column preserved. Uncompromised total knee arthroplasty function after distal femoral osteotomy: a self-matched study of bilateral total knee arthroplasties following unilateral osteotomy with a mean 32-year follow-up Outcomes of external versus internal fixation for traumatic lower limb fractures in low- and middle-income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1