Pub Date : 2026-02-09DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0288.R1
Tim Cheok, Veronica Pajnic, Julie F Vermeir, Yvana Toh, William J Donnelly, Anthony M Silva
Aims: The Mako system is one of the most widely used systems for robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA). Two workflows for femoral preparation exists for this system - the enhanced and the express workflow.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing the accuracy of each workflow in restoring the patient's combined offset and correcting the hip length discrepancy. The Mako derived values were compared against measured values and assessed with Bland-Altman plots and Theil's median slope. Secondary outcomes of interest included comparison of the measured combined offset and hip length discrepancy, surgical time, incidence of postoperative instability/dislocation, as well as pin-site related complications between the two groups.
Results: A total of 81 patients were identified from our database: 61 in the enhanced group and 20 in the express workflow group. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated agreement between the measurements for both hip length discrepancy and combined offset. There was no significant difference in the measurement of hip length discrepancy or combined offset difference between the two groups; however, the magnitude of the latter was better in the enhanced (median 1.50 mm) compared with the express workflow group (median 3.13 mm). There was no significant difference in measured combined offset (p = 0.254), hip length discrepancy (p = 0.425), or surgical time (p = 0.548). Lastly, there were no patients with postoperative instability/dislocation nor pin-site related complications in either group.
Conclusion: Both techniques provide excellent outcomes with minimal risk of complications when performing a Mako robotic arm-assisted THA.
{"title":"Comparing the express and enhanced workflows for restoration of hip length and combined offset using the Mako robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Tim Cheok, Veronica Pajnic, Julie F Vermeir, Yvana Toh, William J Donnelly, Anthony M Silva","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0288.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0288.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Mako system is one of the most widely used systems for robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA). Two workflows for femoral preparation exists for this system - the enhanced and the express workflow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing the accuracy of each workflow in restoring the patient's combined offset and correcting the hip length discrepancy. The Mako derived values were compared against measured values and assessed with Bland-Altman plots and Theil's median slope. Secondary outcomes of interest included comparison of the measured combined offset and hip length discrepancy, surgical time, incidence of postoperative instability/dislocation, as well as pin-site related complications between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 patients were identified from our database: 61 in the enhanced group and 20 in the express workflow group. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated agreement between the measurements for both hip length discrepancy and combined offset. There was no significant difference in the measurement of hip length discrepancy or combined offset difference between the two groups; however, the magnitude of the latter was better in the enhanced (median 1.50 mm) compared with the express workflow group (median 3.13 mm). There was no significant difference in measured combined offset (p = 0.254), hip length discrepancy (p = 0.425), or surgical time (p = 0.548). Lastly, there were no patients with postoperative instability/dislocation nor pin-site related complications in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both techniques provide excellent outcomes with minimal risk of complications when performing a Mako robotic arm-assisted THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 2","pages":"185-194"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146143651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0236.R1
Arno A Macken, Peter Rab, Madu N Soares, Dries Boulidam, Igor Shirinskiy, Gabriel Macheda, Stephane Bland, Agathe Kling, Thibault Lafosse, Geert A Buijze
Aims: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of combined preoperative benzoyl peroxide application and subcutaneous povidone-iodine (PV-I) disinfection, in addition to standard PV-I disinfection of the skin, on intraoperative cultures of Cutibacterium acnes.
Methods: All patients undergoing arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized into one of three groups: control (standard disinfection of the skin with PV-I), double prevention (disinfection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue with PV-I after incision for 60 seconds), and triple prevention (application of benzoyl peroxide during the three days before surgery, disinfection of the skin with PV-I, and disinfection of the subcutaneous tissue with PV-I after incision for 60 seconds). Cultures were taken of the tissue layers, equipment, and the surgeon's gloves. A sample size of 156 patients was calculated. Culture positivity was compared between the groups, with the intra-articular and deep muscular culture as the primary outcome.
Results: A total of 156 patients (median age 58 years (IQR 20 to 85), with 61 patients (39%) being female) were included. The intra-articular cultures were positive in 16 patients (32%) in the control group, 11 (21%) in the double prevention group, and five (10%) in the triple prevention group (p = 0.031). C. acnes presence in the muscular layer was 21 (42%) in the control group, 17 (33%) in the double prevention group, and seven (13%) in the triple prevention group (p = 0.0052). The median number of positive cultures was one in the control group (IQR 0 to 5), one in the double prevention group (IQR 0 to 3.75), and zero in the triple prevention group (IQR 0 to 2; p = 0.082).
Conclusion: Combining disinfection of the subcutaneous tissue after incision with preoperative application of benzoyl peroxide reduced the presence of C. acnes during surgery. These results suggest that the triple prevention protocol may be effective in reducing C. acnes infections after both arthroscopic and open surgery.
{"title":"Benzoyl peroxide combined with subcutaneous iodine reduces Cutibacterium acnes presence during shoulder surgery : a three-armed, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Arno A Macken, Peter Rab, Madu N Soares, Dries Boulidam, Igor Shirinskiy, Gabriel Macheda, Stephane Bland, Agathe Kling, Thibault Lafosse, Geert A Buijze","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0236.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0236.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of combined preoperative benzoyl peroxide application and subcutaneous povidone-iodine (PV-I) disinfection, in addition to standard PV-I disinfection of the skin, on intraoperative cultures of <i>Cutibacterium acnes</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients undergoing arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized into one of three groups: control (standard disinfection of the skin with PV-I), double prevention (disinfection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue with PV-I after incision for 60 seconds), and triple prevention (application of benzoyl peroxide during the three days before surgery, disinfection of the skin with PV-I, and disinfection of the subcutaneous tissue with PV-I after incision for 60 seconds). Cultures were taken of the tissue layers, equipment, and the surgeon's gloves. A sample size of 156 patients was calculated. Culture positivity was compared between the groups, with the intra-articular and deep muscular culture as the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients (median age 58 years (IQR 20 to 85), with 61 patients (39%) being female) were included. The intra-articular cultures were positive in 16 patients (32%) in the control group, 11 (21%) in the double prevention group, and five (10%) in the triple prevention group (p = 0.031). <i>C. acnes</i> presence in the muscular layer was 21 (42%) in the control group, 17 (33%) in the double prevention group, and seven (13%) in the triple prevention group (p = 0.0052). The median number of positive cultures was one in the control group (IQR 0 to 5), one in the double prevention group (IQR 0 to 3.75), and zero in the triple prevention group (IQR 0 to 2; p = 0.082).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining disinfection of the subcutaneous tissue after incision with preoperative application of benzoyl peroxide reduced the presence of <i>C. acnes</i> during surgery. These results suggest that the triple prevention protocol may be effective in reducing <i>C. acnes</i> infections after both arthroscopic and open surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 2","pages":"177-184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875718/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146126595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0252.R1
Meet Vaghela, Alexander Arbis, Daniel Benson, Emmanuel Oladeji, Benedict Rogers, Guy Selmon, Christopher Wakeling, Gareth Chan
Aims: Fragility distal femur fractures have comparable mortality outcomes to fragility hip fractures. Increasing scrutiny is being placed on the perioperative management of these injuries to improve mortality and morbidity outcomes. A key pillar of preoperative consent is the explanation of adverse events associated with the underlying pathology and/or suggested treatment course. The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) is a validated tool used to predict mortality after a fragility hip fracture and has been shown to be predictive of mortality after fragility odontoid peg fractures. This study aims to assess the utility of the NHFS in predicting 30-day and one-year mortality after distal femur fragility fractures.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all consecutive fragility distal femur fractures treated surgically over an 86-month period at six units managing acute fragility fractures was performed. NHFS were calculated, with 30-day and one-year mortality ascertained from local hospital and primary care records. Patients were grouped as 'high-risk' of mortality with a NHFS > 5.
Results: Overall, 30-day mortality was 7.1% in the high-risk cohort (16/225), with no deaths identified in the low-risk cohort. Across both groups one-year mortality rate was 24.9%, with a 6.4% one-year mortality in the low-risk cohort (10/157) compared with 37.8% (85/225) in the high-risk cohort. Area under the curve analysis of receiver operator characteristic curves for 30-day mortality was 0.854 and 0.779 for one-year mortality. This demonstrated excellent predictive power at 30 days, diminishing slightly at one year.
Conclusion: The NHFS is an excellent predictor of 30-day mortality with reliability reducing at one year. A NHFS of 5 or more is associated with a deleterious outcome and can be used to inform discussions with patients and/or relatives regarding adverse outcomes. It can also identify patients with high mortality risk allowing for modifiable risk factors such as time to theatre to be further optimized.
{"title":"The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score is an accurate predictor of mortality at 30 days after fragility distal femur fractures.","authors":"Meet Vaghela, Alexander Arbis, Daniel Benson, Emmanuel Oladeji, Benedict Rogers, Guy Selmon, Christopher Wakeling, Gareth Chan","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0252.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0252.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Fragility distal femur fractures have comparable mortality outcomes to fragility hip fractures. Increasing scrutiny is being placed on the perioperative management of these injuries to improve mortality and morbidity outcomes. A key pillar of preoperative consent is the explanation of adverse events associated with the underlying pathology and/or suggested treatment course. The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) is a validated tool used to predict mortality after a fragility hip fracture and has been shown to be predictive of mortality after fragility odontoid peg fractures. This study aims to assess the utility of the NHFS in predicting 30-day and one-year mortality after distal femur fragility fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of all consecutive fragility distal femur fractures treated surgically over an 86-month period at six units managing acute fragility fractures was performed. NHFS were calculated, with 30-day and one-year mortality ascertained from local hospital and primary care records. Patients were grouped as 'high-risk' of mortality with a NHFS <u>></u> 5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 30-day mortality was 7.1% in the high-risk cohort (16/225), with no deaths identified in the low-risk cohort. Across both groups one-year mortality rate was 24.9%, with a 6.4% one-year mortality in the low-risk cohort (10/157) compared with 37.8% (85/225) in the high-risk cohort. Area under the curve analysis of receiver operator characteristic curves for 30-day mortality was 0.854 and 0.779 for one-year mortality. This demonstrated excellent predictive power at 30 days, diminishing slightly at one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NHFS is an excellent predictor of 30-day mortality with reliability reducing at one year. A NHFS of 5 or more is associated with a deleterious outcome and can be used to inform discussions with patients and/or relatives regarding adverse outcomes. It can also identify patients with high mortality risk allowing for modifiable risk factors such as time to theatre to be further optimized.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 2","pages":"169-176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875717/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146126637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-05DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0133.R1
Rune T Paulsen, Claus Varnum, Niels Martin Jensen, Klas J W Gustafson, Bartal B Evaldsson, Per W Kristensen, Lasse E Rasmussen
Aims: With increasing demand for knee arthroplasties, innovative approaches like virtual consultations are gaining traction. This study assesses the feasibility of using virtual consultation as arthroplasty for in-person consultations in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).
Methods: This single-centre cohort study evaluated patients receiving virtual consultations as their primary contact and followed patients scheduled for primary TKA or medial UKA after virtual consultations as their sole preoperative contact between 1 January 2023 and 30 June 2023. Visitation criteria for virtual consultation were severe radiologically confirmed osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ 3 and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade ≤ 2). Outcomes measured included the proportion of patients scheduled for surgery directly after virtual consultation and those requiring additional in-person consultations. Secondary outcomes included the completion of scheduled surgeries, conversion rates from UKA to TKA, and the proportion of patients successfully completing outpatient surgery.
Results: A total of 303 patients received virtual consultations, and 97 (32%) were directly scheduled for surgery. Overall, 123 patients (41%) required in-person consultations, while 83 patients (27%) were managed directly after virtual consultation without surgery. Among the directly scheduled surgeries, 82 (85%) proceeded without changes to the planned course. No perioperative conversions from UKA to TKA occurred. In total, 57 patients (70%) were eligible for outpatient surgery, and 41 of these (72%) successfully completed the course and were discharged on the day of surgery.
Conclusion: This study found it feasible to use virtual consultations as replacement for in-person consultations prior to knee arthroplasty surgery for a selected group of patients. Future research should explore patient safety and patient-reported outcomes to validate these findings.
{"title":"Can virtual consultations replace physical visits before knee arthroplasty? : a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Rune T Paulsen, Claus Varnum, Niels Martin Jensen, Klas J W Gustafson, Bartal B Evaldsson, Per W Kristensen, Lasse E Rasmussen","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0133.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0133.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>With increasing demand for knee arthroplasties, innovative approaches like virtual consultations are gaining traction. This study assesses the feasibility of using virtual consultation as arthroplasty for in-person consultations in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre cohort study evaluated patients receiving virtual consultations as their primary contact and followed patients scheduled for primary TKA or medial UKA after virtual consultations as their sole preoperative contact between 1 January 2023 and 30 June 2023. Visitation criteria for virtual consultation were severe radiologically confirmed osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ 3 and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade ≤ 2). Outcomes measured included the proportion of patients scheduled for surgery directly after virtual consultation and those requiring additional in-person consultations. Secondary outcomes included the completion of scheduled surgeries, conversion rates from UKA to TKA, and the proportion of patients successfully completing outpatient surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 303 patients received virtual consultations, and 97 (32%) were directly scheduled for surgery. Overall, 123 patients (41%) required in-person consultations, while 83 patients (27%) were managed directly after virtual consultation without surgery. Among the directly scheduled surgeries, 82 (85%) proceeded without changes to the planned course. No perioperative conversions from UKA to TKA occurred. In total, 57 patients (70%) were eligible for outpatient surgery, and 41 of these (72%) successfully completed the course and were discharged on the day of surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found it feasible to use virtual consultations as replacement for in-person consultations prior to knee arthroplasty surgery for a selected group of patients. Future research should explore patient safety and patient-reported outcomes to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 2","pages":"164-168"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12872297/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146120305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0202.R2
Yanchun Gao, Kaiwen Zheng, Kaixin Bian, Haifeng Wei, Dehao Fu
Aims: While trochlear dysplasia is recognized as a key factor in patellar instability, its association with specific patellar fracture patterns remains unclear. This study investigates the relationship between trochlear dysplasia and patellar fractures through morphological analysis.
Methods: In this prospective cohort study of 318 patients with acute patellar fractures (January to June 2021), preoperative CT scans were analyzed for trochlear dysplasia parameters: sulcus angle, trochlear depth, and lateral trochlear inclination. Fractures were classified using AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) criteria with emphasis on inferior pole involvement. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify morphological predictors of fracture type.
Results: Trochlear dysplasia was identified in 152 (47.80%) of patients, with a mean sulcus angle of 144.44° (SD 11.16°), trochlear depth of 4.43 mm (SD 1.33), and lateral trochlear inclination of 18.25° (SD 4.89°). Fractures classified as AO/OTA types A and C1.3 were more prevalent in patients with trochlear dysplasia. Logistic regression analysis showed that the sulcus angle significantly influenced the occurrence of the distal fractures (p < 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 1.15, 95% CI 1.111 to 1.187).
Conclusion: Trochlear dysplasia, particularly manifested by an increased sulcus angle, is significantly associated with distal patellar fractures. These findings highlight the importance of preoperative morphological assessment in predicting fracture patterns and tailoring clinical management.
目的:虽然滑车发育不良被认为是髌骨不稳定的关键因素,但其与特定髌骨骨折模式的关系尚不清楚。本研究通过形态学分析探讨滑车发育不良与髌骨骨折的关系。方法:对318例急性髌骨骨折患者(2021年1月至6月)进行前瞻性队列研究,分析术前CT扫描的滑车发育不良参数:沟角、滑车深度和滑车外侧倾角。骨折采用AO/骨科创伤协会(OTA)标准进行分类,重点是下极受累情况。采用多变量logistic回归来确定骨折类型的形态学预测因子。结果:152例(47.80%)患者出现滑车发育不良,滑车沟平均角度144.44°(SD 11.16°),滑车深度4.43 mm (SD 1.33),滑车外侧倾斜18.25°(SD 4.89°)。AO/OTA A型和C1.3型骨折在滑车发育不良患者中更为常见。Logistic回归分析显示,骨沟角度显著影响远端骨折的发生(p < 0.001,优势比(OR) = 1.15, 95% CI 1.111 ~ 1.187)。结论:滑车发育不良与髌骨远端骨折显著相关,尤其是沟角增加。这些发现强调了术前形态学评估在预测骨折类型和定制临床管理中的重要性。
{"title":"Trochlear dysplasia is associated with distal patellar fracture.","authors":"Yanchun Gao, Kaiwen Zheng, Kaixin Bian, Haifeng Wei, Dehao Fu","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0202.R2","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0202.R2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>While trochlear dysplasia is recognized as a key factor in patellar instability, its association with specific patellar fracture patterns remains unclear. This study investigates the relationship between trochlear dysplasia and patellar fractures through morphological analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study of 318 patients with acute patellar fractures (January to June 2021), preoperative CT scans were analyzed for trochlear dysplasia parameters: sulcus angle, trochlear depth, and lateral trochlear inclination. Fractures were classified using AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) criteria with emphasis on inferior pole involvement. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify morphological predictors of fracture type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Trochlear dysplasia was identified in 152 (47.80%) of patients, with a mean sulcus angle of 144.44° (SD 11.16°), trochlear depth of 4.43 mm (SD 1.33), and lateral trochlear inclination of 18.25° (SD 4.89°). Fractures classified as AO/OTA types A and C1.3 were more prevalent in patients with trochlear dysplasia. Logistic regression analysis showed that the sulcus angle significantly influenced the occurrence of the distal fractures (p < 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 1.15, 95% CI 1.111 to 1.187).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trochlear dysplasia, particularly manifested by an increased sulcus angle, is significantly associated with distal patellar fractures. These findings highlight the importance of preoperative morphological assessment in predicting fracture patterns and tailoring clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 2","pages":"158-163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12867555/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146114456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0295.R1
Valentin Cascales, Constant Foissey, Marcelle Mercier, Remy Coulomb, Michel-Henri Fessy, Sébastien Lustig, Pascal Kouyoumdjian, Jean L Prudhon, Roger Badet
Aims: The aims of this study are to identify the causes and independent risk factors for failure following revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study involving 963 patients who underwent RTHA between January 2016 and December 2021 across three French university hospitals, with a minimum follow-up of two years. Data collected included demographic details, revision rank (R1= first revision, R2= second revision, R ≥ 3=third or subsequent revision), surgical variables, complications, reoperations, re-revisions, and mortality. RTHA failure was defined as any reoperation or re-revision. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent risk factors for failure.
Results: The mean patient age was 72 years (14 to 104), with 55% of patients being female. The most common indications for RTHA were aseptic loosening (35.6%), periprosthetic fracture (32.0%), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI; 15.2%), and dislocation (5.7%). Failure occurred in 135 patients (14.0%), most frequently due to PJI (53%), of which 61% were new infections. Among patients revised for dislocation, recurrent instability accounted for 43.7% of failures. Most failures (70%) occurred within one year of revision. Independent risk factors included age ≥ 75 years (odds ratio (OR) 0.61), revision rank ≥ 3 (OR 1.96), PJI (OR 2.0), dislocation (OR 2.86), use of revision (OR 2.38), and constrained acetabular cups (OR 5.38).
Conclusion: Aseptic loosening remains the leading indication for revision surgery, while PJI is the principal cause of failure following RTHA, both as a new infection and as iterative failure. Recurrent dislocation continues to pose a complex challenge despite modern implant strategies, underscoring the need for meticulous surgical planning in high-risk patients.
{"title":"Why revision of total hip arthroplasty fails: a retrospective consecutive cohort study of 963 patients.","authors":"Valentin Cascales, Constant Foissey, Marcelle Mercier, Remy Coulomb, Michel-Henri Fessy, Sébastien Lustig, Pascal Kouyoumdjian, Jean L Prudhon, Roger Badet","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0295.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0295.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of this study are to identify the causes and independent risk factors for failure following revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study involving 963 patients who underwent RTHA between January 2016 and December 2021 across three French university hospitals, with a minimum follow-up of two years. Data collected included demographic details, revision rank (R1= first revision, <i>R</i>2= second revision, <i>R</i> ≥ 3=third or subsequent revision), surgical variables, complications, reoperations, re-revisions, and mortality. RTHA failure was defined as any reoperation or re-revision. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent risk factors for failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 72 years (14 to 104), with 55% of patients being female. The most common indications for RTHA were aseptic loosening (35.6%), periprosthetic fracture (32.0%), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI; 15.2%), and dislocation (5.7%). Failure occurred in 135 patients (14.0%), most frequently due to PJI (53%), of which 61% were new infections. Among patients revised for dislocation, recurrent instability accounted for 43.7% of failures. Most failures (70%) occurred within one year of revision. Independent risk factors included age ≥ 75 years (odds ratio (OR) 0.61), revision rank ≥ 3 (OR 1.96), PJI (OR 2.0), dislocation (OR 2.86), use of revision (OR 2.38), and constrained acetabular cups (OR 5.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aseptic loosening remains the leading indication for revision surgery, while PJI is the principal cause of failure following RTHA, both as a new infection and as iterative failure. Recurrent dislocation continues to pose a complex challenge despite modern implant strategies, underscoring the need for meticulous surgical planning in high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 2","pages":"148-157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12863968/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146107692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0327.R1
Farouk Khury, Garrett Ruff, Hadi Aziz, Sophia S Antonioli, Sophia Hashim, Sujith Konan, Ran Schwarzkopf
Aims: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the setting of proximal femoral defects and poor bone stock often necessitates distal fixation using specialized implants, such as monolithic tapered, fluted titanium stems (TFTSs), to ensure adequate stability. This study evaluates the mid-term outcomes of TFTS in both primary and revision THA.
Methods: This was a multi-institutional retrospective review of patients who received monolithic TFTS between July 2016 and June 2020 during either complex primary THA or revision THA. Outcomes included pre-, intra- and postoperative characteristics, as well as five-year all-cause, septic and aseptic revisions, and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) at different postoperative timepoints.
Results: A total of 115 patients with a mean follow-up of 6.3 years (SD 1.2) were included. Femoral component survivorship free from aseptic revisions was 99.1% (95% CI 97.3 to 100) at 5.1 years after TFTS. Aseptic revision occurred in a single patient (0.9%) due to periprosthetic acetabular fracture that necessitated femoral component removal for exposure 60.6 months following TFTS. Survivorship from septic revisions was 93.2% (95% CI 91.5 to 99.9) at 5.3 years. Septic revisions included debridement, irrigation and exchange of modular components (n = 3, 2.6%), and two-stage revision arthroplasties (n = 4, 3.5%) at a mean of 27.7 months after surgery (1.5 to 63.9). All-cause survivorship from any revision was 92.4% (95% CI 90.5 to 100) at 5.3 years after TFTS. HOOS, JR scores improved from preoperative to five-year follow-up (46.1 (SD 20.8) to 83.8 (SD 19.0), respectively).
Conclusion: The TFTS demonstrates excellent mid-term survivorship (99.1% at five years) and significant clinical improvement in complex primary and revision THA. These outcomes suggest that the TFTS can be considered a valuable option in this challenging patient population.
目的:全髋关节置换术(THA)在股骨近端缺损和骨质不良的情况下,通常需要使用专门的植入物固定远端,如整体锥形,凹槽钛茎(TFTSs),以确保足够的稳定性。本研究评估TFTS在初级THA和改良THA中的中期结果。方法:这是一项多机构回顾性研究,纳入了2016年7月至2020年6月期间在复杂初级THA或翻修THA期间接受整体式TFTS的患者。结果包括术前、术中和术后特征,以及5年全因、脓毒症和无菌性翻修,以及髋关节残疾和骨关节炎在术后不同时间点的关节置换术结局评分(HOOS, JR)。结果:共纳入115例患者,平均随访6.3年(SD 1.2)。在TFTS后5.1年,无菌修复的股骨假体存活率为99.1% (95% CI 97.3 - 100)。一例患者(0.9%)因髋臼假体周围骨折,需要在TFTS后60.6个月取出股骨假体进行无菌翻修。5.3年时,脓毒性修复的生存率为93.2% (95% CI 91.5 - 99.9)。脓毒性修复包括清创、冲洗和模块组件交换(n = 3, 2.6%),以及术后平均27.7个月(1.5 - 63.9)的两期翻修关节置换术(n = 4, 3.5%)。在TFTS后5.3年,任何修订的全因生存率为92.4% (95% CI 90.5 - 100)。HOOS、JR评分从术前到5年随访均有所改善(分别为46.1 (SD 20.8)至83.8 (SD 19.0))。结论:TFTS在复杂的原发性和改进型THA中具有良好的中期生存率(5年生存率为99.1%)和显著的临床改善。这些结果表明,TFTS可以被认为是这一具有挑战性的患者群体的一个有价值的选择。
{"title":"Five-year results of a monolithic tapered, fluted titanium femoral component in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Farouk Khury, Garrett Ruff, Hadi Aziz, Sophia S Antonioli, Sophia Hashim, Sujith Konan, Ran Schwarzkopf","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0327.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.72.BJO-2025-0327.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the setting of proximal femoral defects and poor bone stock often necessitates distal fixation using specialized implants, such as monolithic tapered, fluted titanium stems (TFTSs), to ensure adequate stability. This study evaluates the mid-term outcomes of TFTS in both primary and revision THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multi-institutional retrospective review of patients who received monolithic TFTS between July 2016 and June 2020 during either complex primary THA or revision THA. Outcomes included pre-, intra- and postoperative characteristics, as well as five-year all-cause, septic and aseptic revisions, and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) at different postoperative timepoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 115 patients with a mean follow-up of 6.3 years (SD 1.2) were included. Femoral component survivorship free from aseptic revisions was 99.1% (95% CI 97.3 to 100) at 5.1 years after TFTS. Aseptic revision occurred in a single patient (0.9%) due to periprosthetic acetabular fracture that necessitated femoral component removal for exposure 60.6 months following TFTS. Survivorship from septic revisions was 93.2% (95% CI 91.5 to 99.9) at 5.3 years. Septic revisions included debridement, irrigation and exchange of modular components (n = 3, 2.6%), and two-stage revision arthroplasties (n = 4, 3.5%) at a mean of 27.7 months after surgery (1.5 to 63.9). All-cause survivorship from any revision was 92.4% (95% CI 90.5 to 100) at 5.3 years after TFTS. HOOS, JR scores improved from preoperative to five-year follow-up (46.1 (SD 20.8) to 83.8 (SD 19.0), respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TFTS demonstrates excellent mid-term survivorship (99.1% at five years) and significant clinical improvement in complex primary and revision THA. These outcomes suggest that the TFTS can be considered a valuable option in this challenging patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 2","pages":"138-147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12861558/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.71.BJO-2025-0014.R1
Jia Ye Lin, Pragadesh Natarajan, Victor King Liu, Deanne E Jenkin, Wei-Ju Chang, Justine Naylor, Sam Adie
Aims: Predictive modelling studies are increasingly popular, but the reporting quality in developing and validating these models remains suboptimal. This review aimed to evaluate the methodological quality of predictive models for patient-reported outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), identifying gaps in reporting and biases.
Methods: The review followed PRISMA guidelines, appraising studies that developed and/or validated multivariate predictive models. Methodological quality was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) tool, and reporting quality was evaluated using Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines. An electronic search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL up to 29 May 2025 and several studies from expert recommendation. Studies involving adults (aged ≥ 18 years) undergoing elective primary or revision THA or TKA were included, while univariate analyses and literature reviews were excluded.
Results: The search identified 6,194 results, with 3,793 unique articles. A total of 58 studies were screened, and 41 were included. TRIPOD compliance ranged from 58% to 68%. Overall, 98% of studies had a low risk of bias in participant selection, but 83% showed a high risk of bias in analysis. Applicability concerns were low in 93% of studies.
Conclusion: The review reveals significant methodological limitations in predictive models for THA and TKA outcomes, especially in analysis. Improving adherence to reporting guidelines is essential for enhancing transparency and reliability, ultimately supporting better clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.
{"title":"Evaluating methodological quality of prognostic prediction models on patient-reported outcome measurements after total hip and total knee arthroplasty : a systematic review.","authors":"Jia Ye Lin, Pragadesh Natarajan, Victor King Liu, Deanne E Jenkin, Wei-Ju Chang, Justine Naylor, Sam Adie","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.71.BJO-2025-0014.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.71.BJO-2025-0014.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Predictive modelling studies are increasingly popular, but the reporting quality in developing and validating these models remains suboptimal. This review aimed to evaluate the methodological quality of predictive models for patient-reported outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), identifying gaps in reporting and biases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review followed PRISMA guidelines, appraising studies that developed and/or validated multivariate predictive models. Methodological quality was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) tool, and reporting quality was evaluated using Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines. An electronic search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL up to 29 May 2025 and several studies from expert recommendation. Studies involving adults (aged ≥ 18 years) undergoing elective primary or revision THA or TKA were included, while univariate analyses and literature reviews were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 6,194 results, with 3,793 unique articles. A total of 58 studies were screened, and 41 were included. TRIPOD compliance ranged from 58% to 68%. Overall, 98% of studies had a low risk of bias in participant selection, but 83% showed a high risk of bias in analysis. Applicability concerns were low in 93% of studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review reveals significant methodological limitations in predictive models for THA and TKA outcomes, especially in analysis. Improving adherence to reporting guidelines is essential for enhancing transparency and reliability, ultimately supporting better clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"115-129"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12826832/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146031046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.71.BJO-2025-0241
Katie Ridsdale, Lizzie Swaby, Nikki Totton, Daniel C Perry, Andrew J Mills, Ashley A Cole, Chris Turtle, Simon Waterhouse, Charlotte Heath, Isabelle Wilson, Stephen Walters, Raveen Jayasuriya, Robin Chatters, Heather Dakin, Kerry Walker, Laura Campbell, Anju Keetharuth, Sarah Greenwood, Laura Kenison, Neil Davidson, Masood Shafafy, Tom Marjoram, Neil Oxborrow, Fady Sedra, Mark Harris, Julian Leong, Jonathan Lucas, Darren Lui, Antonia Isaacson, Andy Bowey, Ian Harding, Evan Davies, Vinay Jasani, Almas Khan, Paul Thorpe, Thanos Tsirikos, Sam Sloan, Adrian Gardner, Sashin Ahuja, Chrishan Thakar, Ashok Subramanian
Aims: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis affects 0.2% to 0.5% of adolescents, often requiring bracing to reduce the risk of curve progression. While bracing is typically discontinued at skeletal maturity, significant curve progression can occur afterwards, potentially necessitating surgery. The Bracing AdoleScent Idiopathic Scoliosis (BASIS) 2 study, nested within the larger BASIS trial, aims to evaluate the efficacy of prolonged full-time and night-time bracing beyond skeletal maturity in reducing curve progression. The aim is to determine if six months of additional bracing at normal prescription, after skeletal maturity, significantly reduces curve progression and is acceptable to patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who were successfully treated with bracing.
Methods: This multicentre, prospective, parallel group, pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial will recruit participants from the BASIS study who reach skeletal maturity with a curve < 50°. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either continue bracing for six months or cease bracing immediately.
Outcomes: The primary outcome is curve progression from baseline to two years post-skeletal maturity. Secondary outcomes include radiological measures, patient bracing experience and any preferences, and cost-effectiveness. The sample size is estimated at 228 participants. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and to study participants.
{"title":"Bracing AdoleScent Idiopathic Scoliosis after skeletal maturity (BASIS 2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial within a larger trial.","authors":"Katie Ridsdale, Lizzie Swaby, Nikki Totton, Daniel C Perry, Andrew J Mills, Ashley A Cole, Chris Turtle, Simon Waterhouse, Charlotte Heath, Isabelle Wilson, Stephen Walters, Raveen Jayasuriya, Robin Chatters, Heather Dakin, Kerry Walker, Laura Campbell, Anju Keetharuth, Sarah Greenwood, Laura Kenison, Neil Davidson, Masood Shafafy, Tom Marjoram, Neil Oxborrow, Fady Sedra, Mark Harris, Julian Leong, Jonathan Lucas, Darren Lui, Antonia Isaacson, Andy Bowey, Ian Harding, Evan Davies, Vinay Jasani, Almas Khan, Paul Thorpe, Thanos Tsirikos, Sam Sloan, Adrian Gardner, Sashin Ahuja, Chrishan Thakar, Ashok Subramanian","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.71.BJO-2025-0241","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.71.BJO-2025-0241","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis affects 0.2% to 0.5% of adolescents, often requiring bracing to reduce the risk of curve progression. While bracing is typically discontinued at skeletal maturity, significant curve progression can occur afterwards, potentially necessitating surgery. The Bracing AdoleScent Idiopathic Scoliosis (BASIS) 2 study, nested within the larger BASIS trial, aims to evaluate the efficacy of prolonged full-time and night-time bracing beyond skeletal maturity in reducing curve progression. The aim is to determine if six months of additional bracing at normal prescription, after skeletal maturity, significantly reduces curve progression and is acceptable to patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who were successfully treated with bracing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, prospective, parallel group, pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial will recruit participants from the BASIS study who reach skeletal maturity with a curve < 50°. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either continue bracing for six months or cease bracing immediately.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The primary outcome is curve progression from baseline to two years post-skeletal maturity. Secondary outcomes include radiological measures, patient bracing experience and any preferences, and cost-effectiveness. The sample size is estimated at 228 participants. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and to study participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"130-137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146031080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.71.BJO-2025-0344.R1
Seid Mohammed Abdu, Ebrahim Msaye Assefa, Amare Abera Tareke
Aims: Clubfoot (congenital talipes equinovarus) is a significant cause of childhood disability globally, with the highest burden in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in Africa. The Ponseti method has emerged as the gold standard for treating clubfoot; however, evidence on its treatment outcomes across African nations remains scattered. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the overall and regional outcomes of the Ponseti method in Africa, focusing on success rate, relapse, treatment failure, brace non-compliance, and loss to follow-up.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Hinari, Lens.org, and Google Scholar from inception to 31 May 2025. Additional studies were identified through citation tracking using Citation Chaser. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of the Ponseti method in African populations were included. Quality assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed, and heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics and p-values.
Results: A total of 47 institution-based studies from 15 African countries involving 7,214 participants and 8,135 feet met the inclusion criteria. The overall success rate was 84.8% (95% CI 78.7 to 91.0) by participants and 83.5% (95% CI 78.9 to 88.2) by feet. Relapse was reported in 11.7% (95% CI 7.8 to 15.7) of participants and 12.6% (95% CI 9.3 to 15.9) of feet. Tenotomy was performed in 65.6% of participants and 59.5% of feet. Treatment failure affected 5.1% of feet. Loss to follow-up was 17.4%, and brace non-compliance occurred in 9.2% of patients. Subgroup analysis showed the highest success rate in West Africa (90%) and the lowest in East Africa (73%). Heterogeneity was substantial (I² > 85%).
Conclusion: The Ponseti method shows high effectiveness in African settings. However, relapse and follow-up issues remain key challenges. Hence, region-specific strategies are needed to improve long-term outcomes.
目的:内翻足(先天性马蹄内翻)是全球儿童残疾的一个重要原因,在低收入和中等收入国家,特别是在非洲,负担最重。Ponseti方法已经成为治疗内翻足的金标准;然而,关于非洲国家治疗效果的证据仍然分散。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估非洲Ponseti方法的总体和区域结果,重点关注成功率、复发、治疗失败、支具不依从性和随访损失。方法:综合检索PubMed、Scopus、Hinari、Lens.org和谷歌Scholar自建站至2025年5月31日的文献。通过使用引文追踪器进行引文跟踪,确定了其他研究。研究报告了庞塞提方法在非洲人群中的临床结果。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)的检查表进行质量评估。随机效应模型用于计算汇总估计。还进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析,并使用I²统计量和p值评估异质性。结果:来自15个非洲国家的47项基于机构的研究,涉及7,214名参与者和8,135英尺,符合纳入标准。参与者的总成功率为84.8% (95% CI 78.7至91.0),脚的总成功率为83.5% (95% CI 78.9至88.2)。11.7% (95% CI 7.8 - 15.7)的参与者报告复发,12.6% (95% CI 9.3 - 15.9)的参与者报告复发。65.6%的参与者和59.5%的脚进行了肌腱切开术。治疗失败影响5.1%的足部。随访损失为17.4%,支具不依从性发生率为9.2%。亚组分析显示,西非的成功率最高(90%),东非最低(73%)。异质性显著(I²> 85%)。结论:庞塞提法在非洲地区具有较高的疗效。然而,复发和随访问题仍然是主要的挑战。因此,需要制定针对特定区域的战略来改善长期成果。
{"title":"Treatment outcome of the Ponseti method for clubfoot in Africa : a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Seid Mohammed Abdu, Ebrahim Msaye Assefa, Amare Abera Tareke","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.71.BJO-2025-0344.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.71.BJO-2025-0344.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Clubfoot (congenital talipes equinovarus) is a significant cause of childhood disability globally, with the highest burden in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in Africa. The Ponseti method has emerged as the gold standard for treating clubfoot; however, evidence on its treatment outcomes across African nations remains scattered. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the overall and regional outcomes of the Ponseti method in Africa, focusing on success rate, relapse, treatment failure, brace non-compliance, and loss to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Hinari, Lens.org, and Google Scholar from inception to 31 May 2025. Additional studies were identified through citation tracking using Citation Chaser. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of the Ponseti method in African populations were included. Quality assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed, and heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics and p-values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 institution-based studies from 15 African countries involving 7,214 participants and 8,135 feet met the inclusion criteria. The overall success rate was 84.8% (95% CI 78.7 to 91.0) by participants and 83.5% (95% CI 78.9 to 88.2) by feet. Relapse was reported in 11.7% (95% CI 7.8 to 15.7) of participants and 12.6% (95% CI 9.3 to 15.9) of feet. Tenotomy was performed in 65.6% of participants and 59.5% of feet. Treatment failure affected 5.1% of feet. Loss to follow-up was 17.4%, and brace non-compliance occurred in 9.2% of patients. Subgroup analysis showed the highest success rate in West Africa (90%) and the lowest in East Africa (73%). Heterogeneity was substantial (I² > 85%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Ponseti method shows high effectiveness in African settings. However, relapse and follow-up issues remain key challenges. Hence, region-specific strategies are needed to improve long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"102-114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12826831/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146031041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}