Pub Date : 2025-03-13DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0190
Tony Feng, Andrew Ablett, Chloe E H Scott, Nick D Clement
Aims: This study investigates the effectiveness and adequacy of the informed consent process for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. While informed consent is a legal and ethical responsibility, factors in the trauma setting can impair patients' understanding and retention of information. This study seeks to evaluate patients' recall of perioperative complications and explore their perceptions of the consent process.
Methods: A mixed-methods, multicentre cohort study will be conducted in the Southeast of Scotland. Adult patients with hip fractures will be recruited via consecutive sampling. An information recall questionnaire will be administered within 36 hours of admission to assess unprompted and prompted recall of complications. A subset of participants will then undergo a semi-structured qualitative interview postoperatively to explore their experiences and perceptions of the consent process. Data will be analyzed using a social constructivist grounded theory to assess their perceptions of consent. Ethical approval has been granted by the East of England Research Ethics Committee (reference 23/EE/0233).
Conclusion: Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. The study results will identify challenges in the consent process, particularly in how risks are communicated and understood. The data are expected to inform the development of information aids and enhance the ability of orthopaedic surgeons to provide comprehensive, patient-centred consent.
{"title":"Improving Consent in Trauma: Recall (ICIT: Recall) : a multicentre study protocol of consent for hip fractures.","authors":"Tony Feng, Andrew Ablett, Chloe E H Scott, Nick D Clement","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study investigates the effectiveness and adequacy of the informed consent process for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. While informed consent is a legal and ethical responsibility, factors in the trauma setting can impair patients' understanding and retention of information. This study seeks to evaluate patients' recall of perioperative complications and explore their perceptions of the consent process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods, multicentre cohort study will be conducted in the Southeast of Scotland. Adult patients with hip fractures will be recruited via consecutive sampling. An information recall questionnaire will be administered within 36 hours of admission to assess unprompted and prompted recall of complications. A subset of participants will then undergo a semi-structured qualitative interview postoperatively to explore their experiences and perceptions of the consent process. Data will be analyzed using a social constructivist grounded theory to assess their perceptions of consent. Ethical approval has been granted by the East of England Research Ethics Committee (reference 23/EE/0233).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. The study results will identify challenges in the consent process, particularly in how risks are communicated and understood. The data are expected to inform the development of information aids and enhance the ability of orthopaedic surgeons to provide comprehensive, patient-centred consent.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 3","pages":"336-341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143617128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-12DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0103.R1
Kartik Logishetty, Jeroen C F Verhaegen, Shannon Tse, Tim Maheswaran, Max Fornasiero, Hariharan Subbiah Ponniah, Jonathan B Hutt, Johan D Witt
Aims: The effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with no or minimal radiological signs of osteoarthritis (OA) is unclear. In this study, we aimed to: 1) assess the outcome of such patients; 2) identify patient comorbidities and CT or MRI findings which predicted outcome; and 3) compare their outcome to the expected outcome of THA for hip OA.
Methods: Adult patients undergoing THA for hip pain, with no or minimal radiological features of OA (Tönnis grading scale ≤ 1), were identified from a consecutive series of 1,925 THAs. Exclusion criteria were: inflammatory arthritis; osteonecrosis of the femoral head; prior trauma or infection; and patients without minimum one-year follow-up and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The primary outcome measure was the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Secondary outcome measures were EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) scale, and patient satisfaction on a validated three-point 'better', 'same', or 'worse' scale.
Results: A total of 107 patients with a median age of 41 years (IQR 18 to 73) were included, with mean follow-up of 6.0 years (SD 3.1). All patients underwent a diagnostic hip injection as a decision aid. Median postoperative OHS was 34 (IQR 28 to 42), with 36 patients (33%) achieving a patient-acceptable symptom state (OHS ≥ 42), lower than THA patients in international registries (40 to 43 points). Secondary outcomes were UCLA of 6 (4 to 8) and EQ-VAS of 73 (51 to 80); 91/102 patients (89%) felt 'better' and would 'undergo surgery again'. Patients with chronic pain syndrome or hypermobility had lower OHS than patients without comorbidities (-6 points, p < 0.006). Overall, 84 patients had a CT and 34 patients an MRI. Patients with subchondral cysts (OHS 42 (37 to 45) vs 35 (26 to 36); p = 0.014) or joint space narrowing on CT (OHS 42 (IQR 37 to 44) vs 35 (26 to 36); p = 0.022) had higher function.
Conclusion: Despite high satisfaction levels, patients undergoing THA with minimal or no radiological OA had lower postoperative function than typical THA patients. We recommend obtaining low-dose CT imaging and a diagnostic hip injection to aid decision-making.
{"title":"Does total hip arthroplasty benefit patients with minimal radiological osteoarthritis?","authors":"Kartik Logishetty, Jeroen C F Verhaegen, Shannon Tse, Tim Maheswaran, Max Fornasiero, Hariharan Subbiah Ponniah, Jonathan B Hutt, Johan D Witt","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0103.R1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0103.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with no or minimal radiological signs of osteoarthritis (OA) is unclear. In this study, we aimed to: 1) assess the outcome of such patients; 2) identify patient comorbidities and CT or MRI findings which predicted outcome; and 3) compare their outcome to the expected outcome of THA for hip OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing THA for hip pain, with no or minimal radiological features of OA (Tönnis grading scale ≤ 1), were identified from a consecutive series of 1,925 THAs. Exclusion criteria were: inflammatory arthritis; osteonecrosis of the femoral head; prior trauma or infection; and patients without minimum one-year follow-up and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The primary outcome measure was the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Secondary outcome measures were EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) scale, and patient satisfaction on a validated three-point 'better', 'same', or 'worse' scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 patients with a median age of 41 years (IQR 18 to 73) were included, with mean follow-up of 6.0 years (SD 3.1). All patients underwent a diagnostic hip injection as a decision aid. Median postoperative OHS was 34 (IQR 28 to 42), with 36 patients (33%) achieving a patient-acceptable symptom state (OHS ≥ 42), lower than THA patients in international registries (40 to 43 points). Secondary outcomes were UCLA of 6 (4 to 8) and EQ-VAS of 73 (51 to 80); 91/102 patients (89%) felt 'better' and would 'undergo surgery again'. Patients with chronic pain syndrome or hypermobility had lower OHS than patients without comorbidities (-6 points, p < 0.006). Overall, 84 patients had a CT and 34 patients an MRI. Patients with subchondral cysts (OHS 42 (37 to 45) vs 35 (26 to 36); p = 0.014) or joint space narrowing on CT (OHS 42 (IQR 37 to 44) vs 35 (26 to 36); p = 0.022) had higher function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite high satisfaction levels, patients undergoing THA with minimal or no radiological OA had lower postoperative function than typical THA patients. We recommend obtaining low-dose CT imaging and a diagnostic hip injection to aid decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 3","pages":"328-335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143606605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-11DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0123.R1
Yashvi Verma, Luckshman Bavan, Kylie Maxwell, Catharine S Bradley, Simon P Kelley
Aims: Nonoperative treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) typically involves numerous in-person clinic visits, which can place a significant burden on healthcare services and patients' families. We therefore aimed to establish and validate a pilot hybrid-virtual clinic to evaluate the clinical outcomes with the delivery of a comprehensive nonoperative treatment protocol for infant DDH to streamline care and minimize in-person visits.
Methods: This was a prospective, single-centre, quality improvement (QI) study of infants with DDH who underwent a comprehensive nonoperative treatment protocol in a unified multidisciplinary infant hip clinic from December 2022 to October 2023. Practice changes were made to our published nonoperative treatment protocol, where specific in-person follow-up visits were replaced with virtual appointments, and a dedicated institutional infant hip clinic email was created for caregiver inquiries.
Results: Of all interim follow-up visits, 53% (77/144) occurred virtually; 94% (48/51) of infants successfully completed brace treatment. No failures of treatment occurred during the virtual follow-up period. In total, 8% (4/51) of infants experienced brace-related complications, including only one during the virtual phase; 10% (5/51) of infants made unplanned visits to the hip clinic, including two infants who attended for brace check and adjustments during the virtual phase. One unplanned ultrasound examination occurred during the virtual phase upon request of a caregiver, which did not alter the course of treatment. No infants required bracing for an extended time due to virtual visits. Overall, 92% (47/51) of caregivers reported awareness of the hip clinic email and 33% (17/51) used this resource. No urgent inquiries were received during the virtual phase.
Conclusion: Our hybrid-virtual infant hip clinic has shown comparable outcomes to the historic norms of our in-person infant hip clinic. This model of care can improve the efficiency of standardized DDH treatment protocols while maintaining excellent clinical outcomes.
{"title":"The clinical outcomes of a hybrid-virtual infant hip clinic for the nonoperative treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip : a quality improvement study.","authors":"Yashvi Verma, Luckshman Bavan, Kylie Maxwell, Catharine S Bradley, Simon P Kelley","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0123.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0123.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Nonoperative treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) typically involves numerous in-person clinic visits, which can place a significant burden on healthcare services and patients' families. We therefore aimed to establish and validate a pilot hybrid-virtual clinic to evaluate the clinical outcomes with the delivery of a comprehensive nonoperative treatment protocol for infant DDH to streamline care and minimize in-person visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, single-centre, quality improvement (QI) study of infants with DDH who underwent a comprehensive nonoperative treatment protocol in a unified multidisciplinary infant hip clinic from December 2022 to October 2023. Practice changes were made to our published nonoperative treatment protocol, where specific in-person follow-up visits were replaced with virtual appointments, and a dedicated institutional infant hip clinic email was created for caregiver inquiries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all interim follow-up visits, 53% (77/144) occurred virtually; 94% (48/51) of infants successfully completed brace treatment. No failures of treatment occurred during the virtual follow-up period. In total, 8% (4/51) of infants experienced brace-related complications, including only one during the virtual phase; 10% (5/51) of infants made unplanned visits to the hip clinic, including two infants who attended for brace check and adjustments during the virtual phase. One unplanned ultrasound examination occurred during the virtual phase upon request of a caregiver, which did not alter the course of treatment. No infants required bracing for an extended time due to virtual visits. Overall, 92% (47/51) of caregivers reported awareness of the hip clinic email and 33% (17/51) used this resource. No urgent inquiries were received during the virtual phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our hybrid-virtual infant hip clinic has shown comparable outcomes to the historic norms of our in-person infant hip clinic. This model of care can improve the efficiency of standardized DDH treatment protocols while maintaining excellent clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 3","pages":"321-327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893193/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143597550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-10DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0237.R1
Lyse van Wijk, Brigitte van der Heijden, J S Souer, Steven E R Hovius, Joost W Colaris
Aims: Diagnostic wrist arthroscopy is considered the gold standard for evaluating wrist joint complaints. Although this tool is often used to diagnose and stage scapholunate ligament (SLL) lesions, reports about the possible findings and their clinical relevance are scarce. Therefore, this study describes the patient characteristics, arthroscopic findings, and treatment of patients who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy for suspected SLL injury.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent diagnostic wrist arthroscopy due to suspicion of a SLL lesion based on medical history, physical examination, and imaging. We systematically gathered arthroscopic findings and complications.
Results: This study included 324 patients, predominantly male (55%), with a median age of 44 years (IQR 29 to 54) and symptom duration of ten months (IQR 5 to 24). The indication of SLL injury was arthroscopically confirmed in 253 patients (78%). Isolated SLL injuries were found in 92 patients (28%) (Geissler I/II: 32%; III: 37%; IV: 32%). SLL lesions and SLL-associated cartilage damage were discovered in 31 patients (10%). Additional findings were found in 181 patients (56%), such as triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions (36%), lunotriquetral ligament lesions (7%), and radioscaphocapitate ligament lesions (11%). No pathology was found in 20 patients (6%). In 27 patients (8%), complications occurred due to wrist arthroscopy. The most common follow-up surgeries were 3LT (40%), salvage procedures (9%), and ulnar shortening osteotomy (6%).
Conclusion: While diagnostic wrist arthroscopy commonly confirms the suspected SLL lesions and their severity, it often reveals additional pathologies (un)related to the suspected pathology. It is essential to perform the procedure thoroughly to establish all possible pathologies. Determining the appropriate treatment for these additional findings is not always straightforward and needs further investigation.
{"title":"The role of diagnostic wrist arthroscopy in suspected scapholunate ligament injury : a cohort study of 324 patients.","authors":"Lyse van Wijk, Brigitte van der Heijden, J S Souer, Steven E R Hovius, Joost W Colaris","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0237.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0237.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Diagnostic wrist arthroscopy is considered the gold standard for evaluating wrist joint complaints. Although this tool is often used to diagnose and stage scapholunate ligament (SLL) lesions, reports about the possible findings and their clinical relevance are scarce. Therefore, this study describes the patient characteristics, arthroscopic findings, and treatment of patients who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy for suspected SLL injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent diagnostic wrist arthroscopy due to suspicion of a SLL lesion based on medical history, physical examination, and imaging. We systematically gathered arthroscopic findings and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 324 patients, predominantly male (55%), with a median age of 44 years (IQR 29 to 54) and symptom duration of ten months (IQR 5 to 24). The indication of SLL injury was arthroscopically confirmed in 253 patients (78%). Isolated SLL injuries were found in 92 patients (28%) (Geissler I/II: 32%; III: 37%; IV: 32%). SLL lesions and SLL-associated cartilage damage were discovered in 31 patients (10%). Additional findings were found in 181 patients (56%), such as triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions (36%), lunotriquetral ligament lesions (7%), and radioscaphocapitate ligament lesions (11%). No pathology was found in 20 patients (6%). In 27 patients (8%), complications occurred due to wrist arthroscopy. The most common follow-up surgeries were 3LT (40%), salvage procedures (9%), and ulnar shortening osteotomy (6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While diagnostic wrist arthroscopy commonly confirms the suspected SLL lesions and their severity, it often reveals additional pathologies (un)related to the suspected pathology. It is essential to perform the procedure thoroughly to establish all possible pathologies. Determining the appropriate treatment for these additional findings is not always straightforward and needs further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 3","pages":"312-320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890222/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143587446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-08DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0225.R1
Volker Alt, Dominik Szymski, Markus Rupp, Andreas Fontalis, Danguole Vaznaisiene, Leonard C Marais, Christof Wagner, Nike Walter, Volker Alt, Martin Clauss, Matteo Carlo Ferrari, Efthymia Giannitsioti, Mathias Glehr, André Grenho, Tomislav Madjarevic, Dirk J Moojen, Kaisa Huotari, Bedri Karaismailoglu, Rik Osinga, Jeroen Neyt, Imre Sallai, Andrea Sambri, Pablo Sanz-Ruiz, Ricardo Sousa, Anna Stefansdottir, Rihard Trebse, Danguole Vaznaisiene, Marianne Westberg, Christof Wagner
Aims: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) pose significant challenges to patients and healthcare systems worldwide. The aim of this study was to estimate the health-economic burden of reimbursement payment in Europe for PJIs following primary hip and knee arthroplasty.
Methods: The calculation was based on health-economic modelling using data on primary hip and knee arthroplasties for the year 2019 from the Statistical Office of the European Union (Eurostat) and published infection rates to estimate the total number of hip and knee PJIs in 30 European countries. Revision procedures were stratified into: 1) debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR); 2) one-stage exchange; and 3) two-stage revision procedures. The cases were then multiplied by the respective healthcare system reimbursement payments. Payment data were acquired from a survey of 13 countries (Austria, Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Switzerland, Turkey, and the UK) and extrapolated for the remaining countries.
Results: In 2019, a total of 2,048,778 primary total joint replacements were performed (total hip arthroplasty (THA) = 1,147,316 and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) = 901,462), with an estimated 20,416 cases of PJIs (11,131 hip and 9,285 knee) in Europe. This results in an estimated total reimbursement burden of €346,262,026 for European healthcare systems. The breakdown for hip PJI reimbursement was €197,230,953 (€9,751,962 for DAIR procedures, €45,135,894 for one-stage revisions, and €142,343,097 for two-stage revisions). For knee PJIs, the analysis yielded a total reimbursement of €149,031,073 (€9,335,075 for DAIR procedures, €48,058,479 for one-stage revisions, and €91,637,518 for two-stage revisions).
Conclusion: This is the first study to evaluate the health-economic burden of PJIs in Europe, revealing a substantial impact on healthcare systems with an estimated case load of 20,414 cases and overall reimbursement of €346,262,026 for primary THAs and TKAs performed in 2019.
{"title":"The health-economic burden of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections in Europe : a comprehensive analysis following primary arthroplasty.","authors":"Volker Alt, Dominik Szymski, Markus Rupp, Andreas Fontalis, Danguole Vaznaisiene, Leonard C Marais, Christof Wagner, Nike Walter, Volker Alt, Martin Clauss, Matteo Carlo Ferrari, Efthymia Giannitsioti, Mathias Glehr, André Grenho, Tomislav Madjarevic, Dirk J Moojen, Kaisa Huotari, Bedri Karaismailoglu, Rik Osinga, Jeroen Neyt, Imre Sallai, Andrea Sambri, Pablo Sanz-Ruiz, Ricardo Sousa, Anna Stefansdottir, Rihard Trebse, Danguole Vaznaisiene, Marianne Westberg, Christof Wagner","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0225.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0225.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) pose significant challenges to patients and healthcare systems worldwide. The aim of this study was to estimate the health-economic burden of reimbursement payment in Europe for PJIs following primary hip and knee arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The calculation was based on health-economic modelling using data on primary hip and knee arthroplasties for the year 2019 from the Statistical Office of the European Union (Eurostat) and published infection rates to estimate the total number of hip and knee PJIs in 30 European countries. Revision procedures were stratified into: 1) debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR); 2) one-stage exchange; and 3) two-stage revision procedures. The cases were then multiplied by the respective healthcare system reimbursement payments. Payment data were acquired from a survey of 13 countries (Austria, Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Switzerland, Turkey, and the UK) and extrapolated for the remaining countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2019, a total of 2,048,778 primary total joint replacements were performed (total hip arthroplasty (THA) = 1,147,316 and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) = 901,462), with an estimated 20,416 cases of PJIs (11,131 hip and 9,285 knee) in Europe. This results in an estimated total reimbursement burden of €346,262,026 for European healthcare systems. The breakdown for hip PJI reimbursement was €197,230,953 (€9,751,962 for DAIR procedures, €45,135,894 for one-stage revisions, and €142,343,097 for two-stage revisions). For knee PJIs, the analysis yielded a total reimbursement of €149,031,073 (€9,335,075 for DAIR procedures, €48,058,479 for one-stage revisions, and €91,637,518 for two-stage revisions).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to evaluate the health-economic burden of PJIs in Europe, revealing a substantial impact on healthcare systems with an estimated case load of 20,414 cases and overall reimbursement of €346,262,026 for primary THAs and TKAs performed in 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 3","pages":"298-311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888791/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143587429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-07DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0107.R1
Kimberly Zambito, Yevgeniya Kushchayeva, Andrew Bush, Paola Pisani, Sergiy Kushchayeva, Mary Peters, Nick Birch
Aims: Assessment of bone health is a multifaceted clinical process, incorporating biochemical and diagnostic tests that should be accurate and reproducible. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard for evaluation of bone mineral density, but has known limitations. Alternatives include quantitative CT (q-CT), MRI, and peripheral quantitative ultrasound (QUS). Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS) is a new generation of ultrasound technology used for the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) at axial sites that is as accurate as quality-assured DXA scans. It also provides an assessment of the quality of bone architecture. This will be of direct value and significance to orthopaedic surgeons when planning surgical procedures, including fracture fixation and surgery of the hip and spine, since BMD alone is a poor predictor of fracture risk.
Methods: The various other fixed-site technologies such as high-resolution peripheral q-CT (HR-pQCT) and MRI offer no further significant prognostic advantages in terms of assessing bone structure and BMD to predict fracture risk. QUS was the only widely adopted non-fixed imaging option for bone health assessment, but it is not considered adequately accurate to provide a quantitative assessment of BMD or provide a prediction of fracture risk. In contrast, REMS has a robust evidence base that demonstrates its equivalence to DXA in determining BMD at axial sites. Fracture prediction using REMS, combining the output of fragility information and BMD, has been established as more accurate than when using BMD alone.
Conclusion: The practice parameters described in this protocol provide a framework for clinicians who provide REMS services that will, to the greatest possible extent, ensure the most accurate assessment possible from this diagnostic technology.
{"title":"Proposed practice parameters for the performance of radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS) evaluations.","authors":"Kimberly Zambito, Yevgeniya Kushchayeva, Andrew Bush, Paola Pisani, Sergiy Kushchayeva, Mary Peters, Nick Birch","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0107.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0107.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Assessment of bone health is a multifaceted clinical process, incorporating biochemical and diagnostic tests that should be accurate and reproducible. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard for evaluation of bone mineral density, but has known limitations. Alternatives include quantitative CT (q-CT), MRI, and peripheral quantitative ultrasound (QUS). Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS) is a new generation of ultrasound technology used for the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) at axial sites that is as accurate as quality-assured DXA scans. It also provides an assessment of the quality of bone architecture. This will be of direct value and significance to orthopaedic surgeons when planning surgical procedures, including fracture fixation and surgery of the hip and spine, since BMD alone is a poor predictor of fracture risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The various other fixed-site technologies such as high-resolution peripheral q-CT (HR-pQCT) and MRI offer no further significant prognostic advantages in terms of assessing bone structure and BMD to predict fracture risk. QUS was the only widely adopted non-fixed imaging option for bone health assessment, but it is not considered adequately accurate to provide a quantitative assessment of BMD or provide a prediction of fracture risk. In contrast, REMS has a robust evidence base that demonstrates its equivalence to DXA in determining BMD at axial sites. Fracture prediction using REMS, combining the output of fragility information and BMD, has been established as more accurate than when using BMD alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The practice parameters described in this protocol provide a framework for clinicians who provide REMS services that will, to the greatest possible extent, ensure the most accurate assessment possible from this diagnostic technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 3","pages":"291-297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884906/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143574159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-06DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0104.R1
Veena Mazarello Paes, Andrew Ting, James Masters, Mahalia V I Paes, Elizabeth Tutton, Simon M Graham, Matthew L Costa
Aims: Performance indicators are increasingly used to evaluate the quality of healthcare provided to patients with a hip fracture. The aim of this review was to map the variety of performance indicators used around the world and how they are defined.
Methods: We present a mixed methods systematic review of literature on the use of performance indicators in hip fracture care. Evidence was searched through 12 electronic databases and other sources. A Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess methodological quality of studies meeting the inclusion criteria. A protocol for a suite of related systematic reviews was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023417515).
Results: A total 24,634 articles were reviewed, of which 171 met the criteria of the review. Included studies were heterogenous in design and came from varied healthcare systems in 34 different countries. Most studies were conducted in high-income countries in Europe (n = 118), followed by North America (n = 33), Asia (n = 21), Australia (n = 10), and South America (n = 2). The highest number of studies in one country came from the UK (n = 45). Only seven of the 171 studies (< 2,000 participants) were conducted across ten low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There was variation in the performance indicators reported from different healthcare systems, and indicators were often undefined or ambiguously defined. For example, there were multiple definitions of 'early' in terms of surgery, different or missing definitions of 'mobilization', and variety in what was included in an 'orthogeriatric assessment' in hip fracture care. However, several performance indicators appeared commonly, including time to surgery (n = 142/171; 83%), orthogeriatric review (n = 30; 17%), early mobilization after surgery (n = 58; 34%), and bone health assessment (n = 41; 24%). Qualitative studies (n = 18), mainly from high-income countries and India, provided evidence on the experiences of 192 patients and 138 healthcare professionals with regard to the use of performance indicators in clinical care and rehabilitation pathways. Themes included the importance of education and training in parallel with the introduction of performance indicators, clarity of roles with the clinical team, and the need for restructuring or integration of care pathways.
Conclusion: This review identified a large number of performance indicators related to the delivery of healthcare for patients with a hip fracture. However, their definitions and thresholds varied across studies and countries. Evidence from LMICs is sparse. Both qualitative and quantitative evidence indicates that there remains a pressing need for further research into the use and standardization of performance indicators in hip fracture care and their influence on patient outcomes and economic costs.
{"title":"Which performance indicators are used globally for evaluating healthcare in patients with a hip fracture? : a mixed methods systematic review.","authors":"Veena Mazarello Paes, Andrew Ting, James Masters, Mahalia V I Paes, Elizabeth Tutton, Simon M Graham, Matthew L Costa","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0104.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0104.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Performance indicators are increasingly used to evaluate the quality of healthcare provided to patients with a hip fracture. The aim of this review was to map the variety of performance indicators used around the world and how they are defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a mixed methods systematic review of literature on the use of performance indicators in hip fracture care. Evidence was searched through 12 electronic databases and other sources. A Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess methodological quality of studies meeting the inclusion criteria. A protocol for a suite of related systematic reviews was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023417515).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total 24,634 articles were reviewed, of which 171 met the criteria of the review. Included studies were heterogenous in design and came from varied healthcare systems in 34 different countries. Most studies were conducted in high-income countries in Europe (n = 118), followed by North America (n = 33), Asia (n = 21), Australia (n = 10), and South America (n = 2). The highest number of studies in one country came from the UK (n = 45). Only seven of the 171 studies (< 2,000 participants) were conducted across ten low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There was variation in the performance indicators reported from different healthcare systems, and indicators were often undefined or ambiguously defined. For example, there were multiple definitions of 'early' in terms of surgery, different or missing definitions of 'mobilization', and variety in what was included in an 'orthogeriatric assessment' in hip fracture care. However, several performance indicators appeared commonly, including time to surgery (n = 142/171; 83%), orthogeriatric review (n = 30; 17%), early mobilization after surgery (n = 58; 34%), and bone health assessment (n = 41; 24%). Qualitative studies (n = 18), mainly from high-income countries and India, provided evidence on the experiences of 192 patients and 138 healthcare professionals with regard to the use of performance indicators in clinical care and rehabilitation pathways. Themes included the importance of education and training in parallel with the introduction of performance indicators, clarity of roles with the clinical team, and the need for restructuring or integration of care pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review identified a large number of performance indicators related to the delivery of healthcare for patients with a hip fracture. However, their definitions and thresholds varied across studies and countries. Evidence from LMICs is sparse. Both qualitative and quantitative evidence indicates that there remains a pressing need for further research into the use and standardization of performance indicators in hip fracture care and their influence on patient outcomes and economic costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 3","pages":"275-290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882308/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143568247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-05DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0081.R1
Luke Farrow, Arslan Raja, Mingjun Zhong, Lesley Anderson
Aims: Prevalence of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms within the Trauma & Orthopaedics (T&O) literature has greatly increased over the last ten years. One increasingly explored aspect of AI is the automated interpretation of free-text data often prevalent in electronic medical records (known as natural language processing (NLP)). We set out to review the current evidence for applications of NLP methodology in T&O, including assessment of study design and reporting.
Methods: MEDLINE, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were screened for studies pertaining to NLP in T&O from database inception to 31 December 2023. An additional grey literature search was performed. NLP quality assessment followed the criteria outlined by Farrow et al in 2021 with two independent reviewers (classification as absent, incomplete, or complete). Reporting was performed according to the Synthesis-Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guidelines. The review protocol was registered on the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration no. CRD42022291714).
Results: The final review included 31 articles (published between 2012 and 2021). The most common subspeciality areas included trauma, arthroplasty, and spine; 13% (4/31) related to online reviews/social media, 42% (13/31) to clinical notes/operation notes, 42% (13/31) to radiology reports, and 3% (1/31) to systematic review. According to the reporting criteria, 16% (5/31) were considered good quality, 74% (23/31) average quality, and 6% (2/31) poor quality. The most commonly absent reporting criteria were evaluation of missing data (26/31), sample size calculation (31/31), and external validation of the study results (29/31 papers). Code and data availability were also poorly documented in most studies.
Conclusion: Application of NLP is becoming increasingly common in T&O; however, published article quality is mixed, with few high-quality studies. There are key consistent deficiencies in published work relating to NLP which ultimately influence the potential for clinical application. Open science is an important part of research transparency that should be encouraged in NLP algorithm development and reporting.
{"title":"A systematic review of natural language processing applications in Trauma & Orthopaedics.","authors":"Luke Farrow, Arslan Raja, Mingjun Zhong, Lesley Anderson","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0081.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0081.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Prevalence of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms within the Trauma & Orthopaedics (T&O) literature has greatly increased over the last ten years. One increasingly explored aspect of AI is the automated interpretation of free-text data often prevalent in electronic medical records (known as natural language processing (NLP)). We set out to review the current evidence for applications of NLP methodology in T&O, including assessment of study design and reporting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were screened for studies pertaining to NLP in T&O from database inception to 31 December 2023. An additional grey literature search was performed. NLP quality assessment followed the criteria outlined by Farrow et al in 2021 with two independent reviewers (classification as absent, incomplete, or complete). Reporting was performed according to the Synthesis-Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guidelines. The review protocol was registered on the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration no. CRD42022291714).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final review included 31 articles (published between 2012 and 2021). The most common subspeciality areas included trauma, arthroplasty, and spine; 13% (4/31) related to online reviews/social media, 42% (13/31) to clinical notes/operation notes, 42% (13/31) to radiology reports, and 3% (1/31) to systematic review. According to the reporting criteria, 16% (5/31) were considered good quality, 74% (23/31) average quality, and 6% (2/31) poor quality. The most commonly absent reporting criteria were evaluation of missing data (26/31), sample size calculation (31/31), and external validation of the study results (29/31 papers). Code and data availability were also poorly documented in most studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Application of NLP is becoming increasingly common in T&O; however, published article quality is mixed, with few high-quality studies. There are key consistent deficiencies in published work relating to NLP which ultimately influence the potential for clinical application. Open science is an important part of research transparency that should be encouraged in NLP algorithm development and reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 3","pages":"264-274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11879473/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143558057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-04DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0242
Anna H M Mennen, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Frank W Bloemers, Abby E Geerlings, Meike E Van Haeringen, Justus R De Jong, Michael H J Verhofstad, Mark G Van Vledder, Daphne Van Embden
Aims: Paediatric pelvic ring fractures are rare but severe injuries, presenting significant treatment challenges. This study aimed to analyze patient characteristics and explore trends in incidence, treatment methods, and mortality associated with these injuries.
Methods: This multicentre, retrospective cohort study analyzed paediatric patients (aged ≤ 18 years) with pelvic ring fractures treated between 2001 and 2021 at two level 1 trauma centres. Data on patient demographics, injury characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes were collected, and visual trend analysis was conducted to identify patterns.
Results: A total of 157 patients with pelvic ring fractures were included. The median age was 15 years (IQR 12 to 17), with 52% (n = 81) being female. Traffic accidents were the leading cause of injury, accounting for 68% of cases (n = 106). Concomitant injuries were observed in 83% of patients (n = 131). The one-year mortality rate was 11.5%, with 76% of deaths occurring within 48 hours of admission, primarily due to traumatic brain injury (53%). Most patients (60%) were treated nonoperatively, while 48% of surgically treated patients underwent internal fixation without prior external fixation. Visual trend analysis revealed an increase in the absolute number of paediatric pelvic ring fractures over time, though no significant shift towards surgical treatment was observed. Among surgically treated patients, there was a trend towards open reduction and internal fixation rather than external fixation as definitive treatment. Nonoperative treatment was more common in children (69%) than in adolescents (55%). For surgical cases, external fixation was preferred in children (44%), while ORIF was more common in adolescents (53%).
Conclusion: The incidence of paediatric pelvic ring fractures has increased over time, with a high mortality rate largely attributable to severe neurotrauma. There has been a shift towards surgical treatment without prior external fixation, with differences noted in the treatment approaches between children and adolescents, particularly in surgical fixation methods.
{"title":"Number, treatment, and mortality of paediatric pelvic ring fractures in two level 1 trauma centres in the Netherlands : a multicentre retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Anna H M Mennen, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Frank W Bloemers, Abby E Geerlings, Meike E Van Haeringen, Justus R De Jong, Michael H J Verhofstad, Mark G Van Vledder, Daphne Van Embden","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0242","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0242","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Paediatric pelvic ring fractures are rare but severe injuries, presenting significant treatment challenges. This study aimed to analyze patient characteristics and explore trends in incidence, treatment methods, and mortality associated with these injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, retrospective cohort study analyzed paediatric patients (aged ≤ 18 years) with pelvic ring fractures treated between 2001 and 2021 at two level 1 trauma centres. Data on patient demographics, injury characteristics, treatment approaches, and outcomes were collected, and visual trend analysis was conducted to identify patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 157 patients with pelvic ring fractures were included. The median age was 15 years (IQR 12 to 17), with 52% (n = 81) being female. Traffic accidents were the leading cause of injury, accounting for 68% of cases (n = 106). Concomitant injuries were observed in 83% of patients (n = 131). The one-year mortality rate was 11.5%, with 76% of deaths occurring within 48 hours of admission, primarily due to traumatic brain injury (53%). Most patients (60%) were treated nonoperatively, while 48% of surgically treated patients underwent internal fixation without prior external fixation. Visual trend analysis revealed an increase in the absolute number of paediatric pelvic ring fractures over time, though no significant shift towards surgical treatment was observed. Among surgically treated patients, there was a trend towards open reduction and internal fixation rather than external fixation as definitive treatment. Nonoperative treatment was more common in children (69%) than in adolescents (55%). For surgical cases, external fixation was preferred in children (44%), while ORIF was more common in adolescents (53%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of paediatric pelvic ring fractures has increased over time, with a high mortality rate largely attributable to severe neurotrauma. There has been a shift towards surgical treatment without prior external fixation, with differences noted in the treatment approaches between children and adolescents, particularly in surgical fixation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 3","pages":"254-263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875687/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143543701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-03DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0211.R1
Gemma Smith, Wai H Teng, Nicholas D Riley, Christopher Little, Edward Sellon, Neal Thurley, Joe Dias, Benjamin J F Dean
Aims: To evaluate the diagnostic characteristics and reliability of radiological methods used to assess scaphoid fracture union through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2022. Any study reporting data on the diagnostic characteristics and/or the reliability of radiological methods assessing scaphoid union was included. Data were extracted and checked for accuracy and completeness by pairs of reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Results: A total of 13 studies were included, which were three assessed radiographs alone, six CT alone, and four radiographs + CT. Diagnostic sensitivity was assessed by CT in three studies (0.78, 0.78, and 0.73) and by radiographs in two studies (0.65, 0.75). Diagnostic specificity was assessed by CT in three studies (0.96, 0.8, 0.4) and by radiographs in two studies (0.67, 0.4). Interobserver reliability was assessed for radiographs by seven studies (two fair, four moderate, and one substantial) and for CT in nine studies (one fair, one moderate, six substantial, and one almost perfect).
Conclusion: There is evidence to support both the use of CT and radiographs in assessing scaphoid fracture union. Although CT appears superior in terms of both its diagnostic characteristics and reliability, further research is necessary to better define the optimal clinical pathways for patients.
{"title":"The diagnostic characteristics and reliability of radiological methods used in the assessment of scaphoid fracture union : a systematic review.","authors":"Gemma Smith, Wai H Teng, Nicholas D Riley, Christopher Little, Edward Sellon, Neal Thurley, Joe Dias, Benjamin J F Dean","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0211.R1","DOIUrl":"10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0211.R1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic characteristics and reliability of radiological methods used to assess scaphoid fracture union through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2022. Any study reporting data on the diagnostic characteristics and/or the reliability of radiological methods assessing scaphoid union was included. Data were extracted and checked for accuracy and completeness by pairs of reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 studies were included, which were three assessed radiographs alone, six CT alone, and four radiographs + CT. Diagnostic sensitivity was assessed by CT in three studies (0.78, 0.78, and 0.73) and by radiographs in two studies (0.65, 0.75). Diagnostic specificity was assessed by CT in three studies (0.96, 0.8, 0.4) and by radiographs in two studies (0.67, 0.4). Interobserver reliability was assessed for radiographs by seven studies (two fair, four moderate, and one substantial) and for CT in nine studies (one fair, one moderate, six substantial, and one almost perfect).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is evidence to support both the use of CT and radiographs in assessing scaphoid fracture union. Although CT appears superior in terms of both its diagnostic characteristics and reliability, further research is necessary to better define the optimal clinical pathways for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 3","pages":"246-253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872279/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143538068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}