How Does the Breastfeeding Environment Affect Satisfaction? A Scale Development Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1177/19375867241238467
Feyza Aktaş Reyhan, Havva Yeşildere Sağlam, Fatma Deniz Sayiner
{"title":"How Does the Breastfeeding Environment Affect Satisfaction? A Scale Development Study.","authors":"Feyza Aktaş Reyhan, Havva Yeşildere Sağlam, Fatma Deniz Sayiner","doi":"10.1177/19375867241238467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women need a safe and comfortable environment to breastfeed their babies. The quality of breastfeeding environments in social areas is important for women's breastfeeding satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop a measurement tool for the evaluation of breastfeeding environments and to examine the impact of the quality of breastfeeding environments in social areas on breastfeeding satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The first phase of the study was conducted in methodological design and the second phase in cross-sectional design. The draft scale was applied to 365 women who had breastfeeding experiences in social environments during the postpartum 6 months-3 years period. In the first stage, scale development analyses were applied. In the second stage, the developed scale was applied to 255 women. Frequency, percentage, Cronbach's α coefficient, and correlation analysis were used in the analysis of the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Ideal Breastfeeding Environment Assessment Scale, consisting of 23 items and four subdimensions, was obtained in the study. As a result of the application of the scale in the second stage, the mean score of the breastfeeding environments evaluated by the women was 23.43 ± 8.36. A statistically significant moderate-weak correlation was found between the ideality of breastfeeding environments and the satisfaction levels of women (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was determined that the developed scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to evaluate breastfeeding environments. As the quality of breastfeeding environments increases, women's breastfeeding satisfaction increases.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867241238467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women need a safe and comfortable environment to breastfeed their babies. The quality of breastfeeding environments in social areas is important for women's breastfeeding satisfaction.

Aim: The aim of this study was to develop a measurement tool for the evaluation of breastfeeding environments and to examine the impact of the quality of breastfeeding environments in social areas on breastfeeding satisfaction.

Method: The first phase of the study was conducted in methodological design and the second phase in cross-sectional design. The draft scale was applied to 365 women who had breastfeeding experiences in social environments during the postpartum 6 months-3 years period. In the first stage, scale development analyses were applied. In the second stage, the developed scale was applied to 255 women. Frequency, percentage, Cronbach's α coefficient, and correlation analysis were used in the analysis of the data.

Results: The Ideal Breastfeeding Environment Assessment Scale, consisting of 23 items and four subdimensions, was obtained in the study. As a result of the application of the scale in the second stage, the mean score of the breastfeeding environments evaluated by the women was 23.43 ± 8.36. A statistically significant moderate-weak correlation was found between the ideality of breastfeeding environments and the satisfaction levels of women (p < .001).

Conclusion: It was determined that the developed scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to evaluate breastfeeding environments. As the quality of breastfeeding environments increases, women's breastfeeding satisfaction increases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母乳喂养环境如何影响满意度?量表开发研究。
背景介绍妇女需要一个安全舒适的环境来给婴儿喂奶。目的:本研究的目的是开发一种用于评估母乳喂养环境的测量工具,并研究社会区域母乳喂养环境的质量对母乳喂养满意度的影响:研究的第一阶段采用方法学设计,第二阶段采用横断面设计。量表草案适用于产后 6 个月至 3 年期间在社会环境中有过母乳喂养经历的 365 名妇女。在第一阶段,进行了量表开发分析。在第二阶段,对 255 名妇女进行了量表开发分析。数据分析采用了频率、百分比、克朗巴赫 α 系数和相关分析等方法:研究得出了理想母乳喂养环境评估量表,该量表由 23 个项目和 4 个子维度组成。在第二阶段使用该量表后,妇女对母乳喂养环境评价的平均得分为(23.43 ± 8.36)分。母乳喂养环境的理想度与妇女的满意度之间存在统计学意义上的中弱相关(p < .001):结论:所开发的量表是一种有效、可靠的测量工具,可用于评估母乳喂养环境。随着母乳喂养环境质量的提高,妇女对母乳喂养的满意度也会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
22.70%
发文量
82
期刊最新文献
Design of a Cancer Infusion Center: Results from a Pre- and Post-Occupancy Evaluation. Perspectives of Families and Healthcare Staff on the Design of Inpatient Hospital Rooms in Saudi Arabia. Blue Space: Extracting the Sensory Characteristics of Waterscapes as a Potential Tool for Anxiety Mitigation Emergency Department Environmental Responses to COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study Harmony in Nature: Exploring the Multisensory Impact of Classical Gardens on Individuals' Well-Being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1