Does economic performance matter for forest conversion in Congo Basin tropical forests?FMOLS-DOLS approaches

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS Forest Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103199
Jonathan Bakadila Ngoma, Ling Yang
{"title":"Does economic performance matter for forest conversion in Congo Basin tropical forests?FMOLS-DOLS approaches","authors":"Jonathan Bakadila Ngoma,&nbsp;Ling Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deforestation through forest conversion is a significant threat to the environment that leads to biodiversity loss, land degradation, soil erosion, and climate change. We add to the literature by analyzing the aggregated (with the basic model estimated using GDP as a proxy for economic activity) and disaggregated (with the extended models using agriculture and mining as proxies for economic activities) effects of economic performance on deforestation in the Congo Basin, which is the world's second-largest contiguous block of tropical forest that has experienced an increase in deforestation in recent years. To solve the problems of small sample bias and series correlation, forest conversion data are explained using FMOLS-DOLS estimators with data from 1990 to 2020. The results show an inverted U-shaped pattern when mining and agriculture are considered indicators for economic activities while a U-shaped relationship when GDP is used as a proxy for economic activities. We also found that population, openness, forest rents, and institutions were significant determinants of deforestation in the Congo Basin. Hence, we suggested that deforestation rates can be reduced by enhanced educational attainment in collaboration with agricultural and mining technology improvement while strengthening governance will curtail deforestation and pave the way for sustainable exploitation of forest resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deforestation through forest conversion is a significant threat to the environment that leads to biodiversity loss, land degradation, soil erosion, and climate change. We add to the literature by analyzing the aggregated (with the basic model estimated using GDP as a proxy for economic activity) and disaggregated (with the extended models using agriculture and mining as proxies for economic activities) effects of economic performance on deforestation in the Congo Basin, which is the world's second-largest contiguous block of tropical forest that has experienced an increase in deforestation in recent years. To solve the problems of small sample bias and series correlation, forest conversion data are explained using FMOLS-DOLS estimators with data from 1990 to 2020. The results show an inverted U-shaped pattern when mining and agriculture are considered indicators for economic activities while a U-shaped relationship when GDP is used as a proxy for economic activities. We also found that population, openness, forest rents, and institutions were significant determinants of deforestation in the Congo Basin. Hence, we suggested that deforestation rates can be reduced by enhanced educational attainment in collaboration with agricultural and mining technology improvement while strengthening governance will curtail deforestation and pave the way for sustainable exploitation of forest resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刚果盆地热带森林的森林转换是否与经济绩效有关?
通过森林转换砍伐森林是对环境的重大威胁,会导致生物多样性丧失、土地退化、水土流失和气候变化。刚果盆地是世界上第二大热带森林毗连区,近年来森林砍伐量有所增加,我们通过分析刚果盆地经济表现对森林砍伐的综合影响(基本模型使用国内生产总值作为经济活动的替代物进行估算)和分类影响(扩展模型使用农业和采矿业作为经济活动的替代物),对相关文献进行了补充。为解决小样本偏差和序列相关性问题,使用 FMOLS-DOLS 估计器对 1990 年至 2020 年的森林转化数据进行了解释。结果显示,如果将采矿业和农业作为经济活动的指标,则会出现倒 U 型模式;如果将 GDP 作为经济活动的替代指标,则会出现 U 型关系。我们还发现,人口、开放程度、森林租金和制度是刚果盆地森林砍伐的重要决定因素。因此,我们建议通过提高教育水平和改进农业与采矿技术来降低森林砍伐率,而加强治理将减少森林砍伐,为森林资源的可持续开发铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Reviewing factors that influence voluntary participation in conservation programs in Latin America Preliminary evidence of softwood shortage and hardwood availability in EU regions: A spatial analysis using the European Forest Industry Database How contracted tree farmers engage in and benefit from inclusive value chains: Evidence from Vietnam Outsourcing stumpage price uncertainty with American put option for active timber management1 Multiple crises as a policy window for forest and nature a power-analysis from Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1