‘What is the self anyway?’ towards a more parsimonious conceptualisation of the self: A review

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101080
E. Hards , C.J. Rathbone , J.A. Ellis , S. Reynolds
{"title":"‘What is the self anyway?’ towards a more parsimonious conceptualisation of the self: A review","authors":"E. Hards ,&nbsp;C.J. Rathbone ,&nbsp;J.A. Ellis ,&nbsp;S. Reynolds","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ‘self’ is of interest across multiple psychological, cognitive, and social sciences. Unhelpfully, a plethora of terms are used across different theoretical and empirical areas. This leads to inconsistency, confusion and lack of clarity and impedes cross-disciplinary communication and progress. To improve clarity, increase parsimony and support theoretical and empirical advances, it is important to establish clear terms that can be applied consistently across psychology. The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive initial inventory of synthesised self-terms that can be used by, and across psychology. We review self-terms used across different areas in psychology and identify a set of terms that are most frequently and consistently used across these domains. We then present a synthesis of commonly used ‘self-terms’ that are specifically related to six psychological sub-disciplines; Cognitive, Social, Developmental, Neuroscience, Clinical and Personality psychology. A glossary of self-terms, together with frequently used synonymous self-terms are presented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ‘self’ is of interest across multiple psychological, cognitive, and social sciences. Unhelpfully, a plethora of terms are used across different theoretical and empirical areas. This leads to inconsistency, confusion and lack of clarity and impedes cross-disciplinary communication and progress. To improve clarity, increase parsimony and support theoretical and empirical advances, it is important to establish clear terms that can be applied consistently across psychology. The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive initial inventory of synthesised self-terms that can be used by, and across psychology. We review self-terms used across different areas in psychology and identify a set of terms that are most frequently and consistently used across these domains. We then present a synthesis of commonly used ‘self-terms’ that are specifically related to six psychological sub-disciplines; Cognitive, Social, Developmental, Neuroscience, Clinical and Personality psychology. A glossary of self-terms, together with frequently used synonymous self-terms are presented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我到底是什么?回顾
自我 "是多门心理学、认知科学和社会科学都关注的问题。但不同的理论和经验领域使用了大量的术语,这很不利。这导致了术语的不一致、混淆和不清晰,阻碍了跨学科交流和进步。为了提高清晰度、增强解析性并支持理论和经验的进步,建立可在心理学中一致应用的清晰术语非常重要。本文旨在提供一份全面的综合自我术语初步清单,供心理学界使用。我们回顾了心理学不同领域中使用的自我术语,并确定了一组在这些领域中使用最频繁、最一致的术语。然后,我们汇总了与认知心理学、社会心理学、发展心理学、神经科学、临床心理学和人格心理学等六个心理学分支学科相关的常用 "自我术语"。我们还提供了自我术语词汇表以及常用的同义自我术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Is emesis a part of antenatal depression? A proposal of emesis-depression complex during pregnancy Up in a flash: On the narratological and epistemic aspects of flashbulb memories Breaking the chains of independence: A Bayesian uncertainty model of normative violations in human causal probabilistic reasoning Co-constructing layers of meaning: Early triadic interactions at the threshold of intentionality Symbolic narratives and embodied selves: Exploring identity and affective expression in neurodivergent youth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1