New Ideas in Psychology最新文献

The triad of intelligence: A dynamic model of cognitive, emotional, and integrative balance 智力三位一体：认知、情感和综合平衡的动态模型

IF 2.9 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

New Ideas in Psychology

Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2026.101239

Abby Jo Adams

Contemporary theories of intelligence have expanded beyond unitary cognitive models to include emotional, metacognitive, and contextual dimensions. Despite this progress, the field remains fragmented, lacking a unified framework that specifies how analytic reasoning, affective information, and regulatory coordination interact to sustain adaptive functioning. The present paper introduces the Triad of Intelligence (TOI) and the Convergent–Divergent–Integrative (CDI) thinking model as a constrained, theory-development framework addressing this gap.

The TOI delineates three interdependent domains of intelligence—Cognitive Intelligence, Emotional Intelligence, and Integrative Intelligence—each contributing distinct functional roles within an adaptive regulatory system. Cognitive Intelligence supports analytic precision and constraint, Emotional Intelligence provides affective salience and contextual meaning, and Integrative Intelligence governs the coordination, timing, and sequencing of these processes. The CDI model specifies the dynamic process through which these domains are regulated over time. Intelligence is conceptualized as an oscillatory system characterized by transitions among convergent, divergent, and integrative processing modes.

Rather than defining intelligence as a static capacity or a collection of abilities, the TOI–CDI framework conceptualizes intelligence as regulated balance in motion, emerging from the efficient coordination of structure and process under changing demands. The manuscript clarifies the theoretical scope and limits of the framework, explicitly distinguishing it from personality typologies, moral hierarchies, and trait-based accounts. It further outlines empirically tractable predictions across behavioral, physiological, and neurobiological levels, emphasizing coordination and transition efficiency rather than isolated performance maxima.

By integrating structural and dynamic perspectives within a bounded theoretical architecture, the TOI–CDI framework advances a unified account of intelligence that accommodates individual variability, neurodivergence, and contextual sensitivity. This approach provides a foundation for future empirical investigation and interdisciplinary dialogue concerning the nature of adaptive intelligence.

当代智力理论已经超越了单一的认知模型，扩展到包括情感、元认知和情境维度。尽管取得了这些进展，但该领域仍然是碎片化的，缺乏一个统一的框架来规定分析推理、情感信息和调节协调如何相互作用以维持适应性功能。本文介绍了智能三合一（TOI）和收敛-发散-整合（CDI）思维模型，作为解决这一差距的受限理论发展框架。《印度时报》描述了三个相互依存的智能领域——认知智能、情绪智能和综合智能——每个领域在适应性调节系统中都有不同的功能角色。认知智力支持分析的精确性和约束性，情绪智力提供情感显著性和上下文意义，综合智力管理这些过程的协调、时机和顺序。CDI模型指定了一个动态过程，通过这个过程，这些域可以随时间进行调节。智力被定义为一个振荡系统，其特征是在收敛、发散和整合的处理模式之间转换。而不是将智能定义为静态能力或能力的集合，TOI-CDI框架将智能概念化为运动中的调节平衡，在不断变化的需求下，从结构和过程的有效协调中出现。该手稿澄清了该框架的理论范围和局限性，明确地将其与人格类型学，道德等级和基于特征的帐户区分开来。它进一步概述了跨行为、生理和神经生物学水平的经验可处理的预测，强调协调和过渡效率，而不是孤立的性能最大化。通过在有限的理论架构中整合结构和动态视角，TOI-CDI框架提出了一个统一的智能描述，该描述适应个体可变性、神经分化和上下文敏感性。这种方法为未来关于适应性智能本质的实证研究和跨学科对话提供了基础。

{"title":"The triad of intelligence: A dynamic model of cognitive, emotional, and integrative balance","authors":"Abby Jo Adams","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2026.101239","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2026.101239","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contemporary theories of intelligence have expanded beyond unitary cognitive models to include emotional, metacognitive, and contextual dimensions. Despite this progress, the field remains fragmented, lacking a unified framework that specifies how analytic reasoning, affective information, and regulatory coordination interact to sustain adaptive functioning. The present paper introduces the Triad of Intelligence (TOI) and the Convergent–Divergent–Integrative (CDI) thinking model as a constrained, theory-development framework addressing this gap.</div><div>The TOI delineates three interdependent domains of intelligence—Cognitive Intelligence, Emotional Intelligence, and Integrative Intelligence—each contributing distinct functional roles within an adaptive regulatory system. Cognitive Intelligence supports analytic precision and constraint, Emotional Intelligence provides affective salience and contextual meaning, and Integrative Intelligence governs the coordination, timing, and sequencing of these processes. The CDI model specifies the dynamic process through which these domains are regulated over time. Intelligence is conceptualized as an oscillatory system characterized by transitions among convergent, divergent, and integrative processing modes.</div><div>Rather than defining intelligence as a static capacity or a collection of abilities, the TOI–CDI framework conceptualizes intelligence as regulated balance in motion, emerging from the efficient coordination of structure and process under changing demands. The manuscript clarifies the theoretical scope and limits of the framework, explicitly distinguishing it from personality typologies, moral hierarchies, and trait-based accounts. It further outlines empirically tractable predictions across behavioral, physiological, and neurobiological levels, emphasizing coordination and transition efficiency rather than isolated performance maxima.</div><div>By integrating structural and dynamic perspectives within a bounded theoretical architecture, the TOI–CDI framework advances a unified account of intelligence that accommodates individual variability, neurodivergence, and contextual sensitivity. This approach provides a foundation for future empirical investigation and interdisciplinary dialogue concerning the nature of adaptive intelligence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 101239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146098844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How expectations affect conversational assessment and memory formation 期望如何影响会话评估和记忆形成

IF 2.9 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

New Ideas in Psychology

Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2026.101238

Andrew J. Guydish , Jean E. Fox Tree

Conversations are complex. During a conversation, individuals must assess what is said, how it is said, as well as whether expectations about the conversation were met. These components influence our interpersonal experiences and memory formation of those experiences. We discuss conversational expectations through the lens of five theoretical approaches: the interactive alignment model, the collaborative theory, communication accommodation theory, interaction adaptation theory, and expectancy violations theory. We then discuss how expectations affect assessments and memories. We propose a sociocognitive model that incorporates both cognitive and social components of conversation theories. The sociocognitive model integrates informational elements, interactional elements, and social information. The model makes predictions about what makes conversations feel like they were good conversations and what makes conversations memorable. It also helps explain misunderstandings in conversations.

对话是复杂的。在谈话中，个人必须评估对方说了什么，怎么说的，以及对方是否满足了对谈话的期望。这些成分影响着我们的人际经历和这些经历的记忆形成。本文从互动对齐理论、协作理论、沟通适应理论、互动适应理论和期望违背理论这五种理论视角对会话期望进行了探讨。然后我们讨论期望如何影响评估和记忆。我们提出了一个社会认知模型，结合了对话理论的认知和社会成分。社会认知模型集成了信息要素、交互要素和社会信息。该模型预测了是什么让对话让人感觉良好，是什么让对话令人难忘。这也有助于解释对话中的误解。

引用次数: 0

From with-ness to readiness: Writing-With and the Spiral Ethics Protocol-Fourfold (SEP-4) for generative-AI writing 从有准备到准备：用于生成人工智能写作的写作-与螺旋式道德协议-四倍（SEP-4）

IF 2.9 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

New Ideas in Psychology

Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2026.101236

Thanh Thao Le , Trut Thuy Pham

A committee toggles an artificial intelligence (AI) “flag” while, across campus, a teacher invites students to sit with a sentence that refuses to settle; both rooms are stewarding learning under generative AI, but only one keeps relation and return in view. This paper translates Writing-With, a spiral stance that is relational, recursive, reflexive, and re-forming, into a stance-faithful classroom infrastructure: the Spiral Ethics Protocol-Fourfold (SEP-4). Rather than prescribing steps, SEP-4 embeds four minimal traces in ordinary learning-management submissions so that with-ness becomes legible without becoming a compliance regime: a two-to-three-line note situating collaborators and languages, a time-stamped return to a stubborn line, a compact recognition of a shift in stance, and a brief account of how consequences will travel. Implemented across two educational sites, the protocol changed what teachers could see and therefore what they could credit. Relational notes thickened from inventories into situated scenes, returns moved from awkwardness to lines judged central yet unresolved, reflexive entries recorded movements in posture toward audience, risk, and register, and re-forming notes carried small changes from a single draft into course routines. Assessment conversations shifted from origin-guessing to reading reasons already on the page, and multilingual rationales became recognized intellectual labor rather than invisible scaffolding. The contribution is a practical route from stance to infrastructure: a way to keep Writing-With alive at program scale while meeting everyday obligations to transparency, authorship accountability, and language justice.

一个委员会拨动了一面人工智能（AI）“旗帜”，而在校园的另一边，一位老师邀请学生坐下来，说了一句拒绝和解的话；两个房间都是在生成式人工智能下的管家式学习，但只有一个房间保留了关系和回报。本文将“与写作”这一具有关系性、递归性、反思性和重构性的螺旋式立场转化为一种忠实于立场的课堂基础设施：四重螺旋伦理协议（SEP-4）。SEP-4没有规定步骤，而是在普通的学习管理提交文件中嵌入了四个最小的痕迹，以便在不成为合规制度的情况下，“与”变得清晰：两到三行说明合作者和语言的注释，时间戳返回到顽固的行，对立场转变的紧凑认识，以及对后果如何传播的简短说明。该协议在两个教育网站上实施，改变了教师可以看到的内容，从而改变了他们可以信任的内容。关系笔记从清单变成了情境，反馈从尴尬变成了被判断为中心但尚未解决的台词，反射性条目记录了对观众、风险和注册的姿势，重新形成的笔记将单个草稿的小变化带入了课程常规。评估对话从猜测起源转变为阅读页面上已有的理由，多语言的理由成为公认的智力劳动，而不是无形的脚手架。这一贡献是一条从立场到基础设施的实用之路：一种让Writing-With在项目规模上保持活力的方式，同时满足日常透明度、作者责任和语言公正的义务。

{"title":"From with-ness to readiness: Writing-With and the Spiral Ethics Protocol-Fourfold (SEP-4) for generative-AI writing","authors":"Thanh Thao Le , Trut Thuy Pham","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2026.101236","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2026.101236","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A committee toggles an artificial intelligence (AI) “flag” while, across campus, a teacher invites students to sit with a sentence that refuses to settle; both rooms are stewarding learning under generative AI, but only one keeps relation and return in view. This paper translates <em>Writing-With</em>, a spiral stance that is relational, recursive, reflexive, and re-forming, into a stance-faithful classroom infrastructure: the Spiral Ethics Protocol-Fourfold (SEP-4). Rather than prescribing steps, SEP-4 embeds four minimal traces in ordinary learning-management submissions so that with-ness becomes legible without becoming a compliance regime: a two-to-three-line note situating collaborators and languages, a time-stamped return to a stubborn line, a compact recognition of a shift in stance, and a brief account of how consequences will travel. Implemented across two educational sites, the protocol changed what teachers could see and therefore what they could credit. Relational notes thickened from inventories into situated scenes, returns moved from awkwardness to lines judged central yet unresolved, reflexive entries recorded movements in posture toward audience, risk, and register, and re-forming notes carried small changes from a single draft into course routines. Assessment conversations shifted from origin-guessing to reading reasons already on the page, and multilingual rationales became recognized intellectual labor rather than invisible scaffolding. The contribution is a practical route from stance to infrastructure: a way to keep <em>Writing-With</em> alive at program scale while meeting everyday obligations to transparency, authorship accountability, and language justice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Speaking from the in-between: Neurotypical perspectivelessness, neurodivergent authority, and the politics of knowledge 从中间的角度来说：神经典型的透视性，神经发散性的权威，以及知识的政治

IF 2.9 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

New Ideas in Psychology

Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2026.101237

Cole A. Denisen

This study examines how neurodivergent undergraduates navigate higher education by theorizing neurotypical perspectivelessness—the institutional erasure of neurotypicality as a cultural standpoint that allows its sensory, cognitive, and communicative norms to appear neutral and universally shared. Grounded in critical neurodiversity, disability studies, and the embodied theorizing of Anzaldúa, Okello, Walker, and other marginalized scholars, I conceptualize neurodiversity as a theory of flesh: an account of how power, knowledge, and resistance are lived through the bodymind. Drawing on critical narrative inquiry with ten neurodivergent students at a large Midwestern research university, I analyze how institutional structures, policies, and interpersonal interactions reproduce epistemic marginalization by naturalizing neurotypical modes of time, communication, affect, and executive functioning.

Findings demonstrate that students encountered a pervasive neutrality claim that positioned neurotypical interpretations as the only legitimate readings of behavior, knowledge, and presence. This perspectivelessness intersected with race, gender, sexuality, and class, shaping how neurodivergence was made hypervisible, invisible, or morally suspect. Yet participants also enacted neuroqueered praxes which reveal neurodivergent students as theorists and expert knowers whose embodied insights expose the limits of neurotypical common sense.

Overall, this study reframes neurodivergent struggle not as individual deficit but as the predictable outcome of perspectiveless institutional design. Meaningful inclusion requires moving beyond accommodations toward dismantling the epistemic frameworks that render neurotypicality invisible. Centering neurodivergent expertise reveals the borderlands of institutional life as generative spaces of critique, creativity, and resistance, offering pathways toward more just educational futures.

本研究考察了神经分化本科生如何通过将神经典型的无视角理论化来引导高等教育。神经典型的制度性消除作为一种文化立场，使其感觉、认知和交流规范显得中立和普遍共享。在批判性神经多样性、残疾研究以及Anzaldúa、Okello、Walker和其他边缘学者的具体化理论的基础上，我将神经多样性概念化为一种肉体理论：一种关于权力、知识和抵抗如何通过身心生存的描述。通过对中西部一所大型研究型大学的10名神经分化学生进行批判性叙事调查，我分析了制度结构、政策和人际互动如何通过自然化时间、沟通、影响和执行功能的神经典型模式来再现认知边缘化。研究结果表明，学生们遇到了一种普遍的中立性主张，将神经典型的解释定位为对行为、知识和存在的唯一合法解读。这种无透视性与种族、性别、性和阶级交织在一起，塑造了神经分化如何变得超可见、不可见或道德可疑。然而，参与者也制定了神经酷儿实践，这些实践揭示了神经发散学生作为理论家和专家的知识，他们的具体见解暴露了神经典型常识的局限性。总的来说，这项研究将神经分化斗争重新定义为个体缺陷，而不是无视角制度设计的可预测结果。有意义的包容需要超越适应，走向拆除使神经典型性不可见的认知框架。以神经发散性专业知识为中心，揭示了制度生活作为批判、创造力和抵抗的生成空间的边界，为更公正的教育未来提供了途径。

{"title":"Speaking from the in-between: Neurotypical perspectivelessness, neurodivergent authority, and the politics of knowledge","authors":"Cole A. Denisen","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2026.101237","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2026.101237","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how neurodivergent undergraduates navigate higher education by theorizing <em>neurotypical perspectivelessness</em>—the institutional erasure of neurotypicality as a cultural standpoint that allows its sensory, cognitive, and communicative norms to appear neutral and universally shared. Grounded in critical neurodiversity, disability studies, and the embodied theorizing of Anzaldúa, Okello, Walker, and other marginalized scholars, I conceptualize neurodiversity as a <em>theory of flesh</em>: an account of how power, knowledge, and resistance are lived through the bodymind. Drawing on critical narrative inquiry with ten neurodivergent students at a large Midwestern research university, I analyze how institutional structures, policies, and interpersonal interactions reproduce epistemic marginalization by naturalizing neurotypical modes of time, communication, affect, and executive functioning.</div><div>Findings demonstrate that students encountered a pervasive neutrality claim that positioned neurotypical interpretations as the only legitimate readings of behavior, knowledge, and presence. This perspectivelessness intersected with race, gender, sexuality, and class, shaping how neurodivergence was made hypervisible, invisible, or morally suspect. Yet participants also enacted neuroqueered praxes which reveal neurodivergent students as theorists and expert knowers whose embodied insights expose the limits of neurotypical common sense.</div><div>Overall, this study reframes neurodivergent struggle not as individual deficit but as the predictable outcome of perspectiveless institutional design. Meaningful inclusion requires moving beyond accommodations toward dismantling the epistemic frameworks that render neurotypicality invisible. Centering neurodivergent expertise reveals the borderlands of institutional life as generative spaces of critique, creativity, and resistance, offering pathways toward more just educational futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Is emesis a part of antenatal depression? A proposal of emesis-depression complex during pregnancy 呕吐是产前抑郁的一部分吗？妊娠期呕吐抑郁复合体的建议

IF 2.9 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

New Ideas in Psychology

Pub Date : 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101235

Toshinori Kitamura , Ayako Hada , Yuriko Usui , Mizuki Takegata , Mariko Minatani , Mikiyo Wakamatsu , Satoru Takeda

Both depression and emesis (nausea and vomiting) are commonly seen during pregnancy. The two often coexist but their symptomatic structure and causal relationships remain unclear. Using two independent follow-up data (Study 1 with women of 10–13 weeks of gestation [N = initially 382 and follow-up 129] and Study 2 with women of 12–15 weeks of gestation [N = initially 696 and follow-up 245]) sets of pregnant women, we measured depressed mood, loss of interest and three emesis symptoms (nausea, vomiting, and retching). The samples were re-examined with an interval. The 5 symptoms were substantially correlated with each other at each time point and factor analyses identified two factors reflecting depression and emesis. However, depression and emesis were associated with clinical correlates in a very similar manner. Two-step cluster analysis yielded only two clusters: one with and another without depression and emesis simultaneously. Taxometrics indicated dimensionality rather than taxonicity. Findings suggest that emesis and depression during pregnancy are two discrete aspects of a single clinical phenomenon that we propose to name emesis-depression complex.

抑郁和呕吐（恶心和呕吐）在怀孕期间很常见。两者经常共存，但其症状结构和因果关系尚不清楚。使用两组独立的随访数据（研究1为妊娠10-13周的妇女[N =初始382人，随访129人]，研究2为妊娠12-15周的妇女[N =初始696人，随访245人]），我们测量了抑郁情绪、兴趣丧失和三种呕吐症状（恶心、呕吐和干呕）。每隔一段时间重新检查一次样品。这5种症状在每个时间点上都有显著的相关性，因子分析确定了反映抑郁和呕吐的两个因素。然而，抑郁和呕吐与临床相关性以非常相似的方式相关。两步聚类分析只产生两个聚类：一个有和另一个没有抑郁和呕吐同时发生。分类学表明维度而不是分类性。研究结果表明，怀孕期间的呕吐和抑郁是一个单一临床现象的两个离散方面，我们建议将其命名为呕吐-抑郁复合体。

{"title":"Is emesis a part of antenatal depression? A proposal of emesis-depression complex during pregnancy","authors":"Toshinori Kitamura , Ayako Hada , Yuriko Usui , Mizuki Takegata , Mariko Minatani , Mikiyo Wakamatsu , Satoru Takeda","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101235","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101235","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Both depression and emesis (nausea and vomiting) are commonly seen during pregnancy. The two often coexist but their symptomatic structure and causal relationships remain unclear. Using two independent follow-up data (Study 1 with women of 10–13 weeks of gestation [<em>N</em> = initially 382 and follow-up 129] and Study 2 with women of 12–15 weeks of gestation [<em>N</em> = initially 696 and follow-up 245]) sets of pregnant women, we measured depressed mood, loss of interest and three emesis symptoms (nausea, vomiting, and retching). The samples were re-examined with an interval. The 5 symptoms were substantially correlated with each other at each time point and factor analyses identified two factors reflecting depression and emesis. However, depression and emesis were associated with clinical correlates in a very similar manner. Two-step cluster analysis yielded only two clusters: one with and another without depression and emesis simultaneously. Taxometrics indicated dimensionality rather than taxonicity. Findings suggest that emesis and depression during pregnancy are two discrete aspects of a single clinical phenomenon that we propose to name emesis-depression complex.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145790930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Up in a flash: On the narratological and epistemic aspects of flashbulb memories 瞬间：闪光灯记忆的叙事学和认识论方面

IF 2.9 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

New Ideas in Psychology

Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101233

Marshawn Brewer

This paper examines the phenomenological and epistemic dimensions of flashbulb memories, advancing beyond traditional cognitive-mechanistic accounts to explore their constitutive role in autobiographical consciousness. Through a critical analysis of the literature on flashbulb memory formation, I argue that consequentiality—understood as a compound factor incorporating both personal and social dimensions—functions as a necessary though not sufficient condition for these distinctive mnemonic phenomena. Drawing from phenomenological frameworks, particularly the notion of primal institution of sense, I develop novel conceptual tools of mnemonic reactivation and retroactive supersession to illuminate how flashbulb memories serve as hermeneutic touchstones that orient autobiographical understanding. These memories, I contend, transcend their status as mere psychological artifacts to become fundamental structures of temporal and affective self-interpretation. The paper introduces the function of affective periodization to theorize how flashbulb memories demarcate and infuse meaning into distinct life periods, while also exploring their role in periodic initiation and closure. This analysis synthesizes empirical findings with phenomenological insights to advance our understanding of how these vivid recollections shape the architecture of autobiographical consciousness and contribute to the narrative coherence of lived experience.

本文考察了闪光灯记忆的现象学和认识论维度，超越了传统的认知机制解释，探讨了闪光灯记忆在自传体意识中的构成作用。通过对闪光灯记忆形成文献的批判性分析，我认为结果性——被理解为包含个人和社会维度的复合因素——是这些独特的记忆现象的必要条件，但不是充分条件。从现象学框架，特别是感觉的原始制度的概念，我开发了新的概念工具的记忆再激活和追溯取代阐明闪光灯记忆如何作为解释学的试金石，定位自传体的理解。我认为，这些记忆超越了它们仅仅作为心理人工制品的地位，成为时间和情感自我解释的基本结构。本文介绍了情感周期化的功能，以理论化闪光灯记忆如何划分和注入不同的生命周期的意义，同时也探讨了它们在周期启动和结束中的作用。这一分析综合了实证研究结果和现象学的见解，以促进我们对这些生动的回忆如何塑造自传体意识的架构并有助于生活经验的叙事连贯性的理解。

{"title":"Up in a flash: On the narratological and epistemic aspects of flashbulb memories","authors":"Marshawn Brewer","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101233","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101233","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the phenomenological and epistemic dimensions of flashbulb memories, advancing beyond traditional cognitive-mechanistic accounts to explore their constitutive role in autobiographical consciousness. Through a critical analysis of the literature on flashbulb memory formation, I argue that consequentiality—understood as a compound factor incorporating both personal and social dimensions—functions as a necessary though not sufficient condition for these distinctive mnemonic phenomena. Drawing from phenomenological frameworks, particularly the notion of primal institution of sense, I develop novel conceptual tools of mnemonic reactivation and retroactive supersession to illuminate how flashbulb memories serve as hermeneutic touchstones that orient autobiographical understanding. These memories, I contend, transcend their status as mere psychological artifacts to become fundamental structures of temporal and affective self-interpretation. The paper introduces the function of affective periodization to theorize how flashbulb memories demarcate and infuse meaning into distinct life periods, while also exploring their role in periodic initiation and closure. This analysis synthesizes empirical findings with phenomenological insights to advance our understanding of how these vivid recollections shape the architecture of autobiographical consciousness and contribute to the narrative coherence of lived experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145738448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Co-constructing layers of meaning: Early triadic interactions at the threshold of intentionality 共同构建意义层：意向性阈值的早期三元互动

IF 2.9 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

New Ideas in Psychology

Pub Date : 2025-12-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101234

Ana Moreno-Núñez

This article advances a conceptual reorientation of early communication by placing early triadic interactions—those involving infant, adult, and the material environment—at the center of analysis. Prevailing developmental models typically frame triadicity as a late milestone, emerging only once infants display intentional signals such as pointing or joint attention. In contrast, we argue that triadic configurations are already present from the earliest months of life and should be understood as constitutive conditions for meaning-making rather than preparatory scaffolds.

Drawing on semiotic, relational, and multimodal perspectives, we outline how materiality, rhythm, and affective attunement function as core dimensions through which communication emerges. Instead of treating gestures or words as sudden cognitive leaps, these forms are better seen as visible consolidations of longer histories of embodied coordination. Triadic encounters thus reveal communication as a distributed and situated ecology, shaped not only by the infant's initiative but also by the caregiver's configurational role and the affordances of objects and environments.

The implications of this reconceptualization extend beyond developmental psychology. By reframing communication as relational and processual, we open interdisciplinary connections with philosophy of mind, cognitive science, and educational theory. We also highlight the need for methodological approaches that can capture the temporally extended and multimodal dynamics of everyday interaction. Overall, this article proposes a shift in how early communication is defined, studied, and supported: not as the achievement of individual skills, but as the generative ground of human meaning-making.

本文提出了早期沟通的概念重新定位，将早期三合一互动——包括婴儿、成人和物质环境的互动——置于分析的中心。主流的发育模型通常将三联性定义为后期的里程碑，只有在婴儿表现出指向或共同注意等有意信号时才会出现。相反，我们认为三合一结构从生命的最初几个月就已经存在，应该被理解为意义形成的构成条件，而不是准备脚手架。从符号学、关系和多模态的角度出发，我们概述了物质性、节奏和情感调谐如何作为沟通出现的核心维度发挥作用。与其将手势或语言视为突然的认知飞跃，不如将这些形式视为更长期的具体协调历史的可见巩固。因此，三位一体的接触揭示了沟通作为一个分布的和定位的生态，不仅由婴儿的主动性塑造，也由照顾者的配置角色和物体和环境的提供性塑造。这种重新概念化的含义超出了发展心理学。通过将沟通重新定义为关系和过程，我们打开了与心灵哲学、认知科学和教育理论的跨学科联系。我们还强调需要能够捕捉日常相互作用的时间扩展和多模态动态的方法学方法。总的来说，这篇文章提出了如何定义、研究和支持早期沟通的转变：不是作为个人技能的成就，而是作为人类意义创造的生成基础。

{"title":"Co-constructing layers of meaning: Early triadic interactions at the threshold of intentionality","authors":"Ana Moreno-Núñez","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101234","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101234","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article advances a conceptual reorientation of early communication by placing early triadic interactions—those involving infant, adult, and the material environment—at the center of analysis. Prevailing developmental models typically frame triadicity as a late milestone, emerging only once infants display intentional signals such as pointing or joint attention. In contrast, we argue that triadic configurations are already present from the earliest months of life and should be understood as constitutive conditions for meaning-making rather than preparatory scaffolds.</div><div>Drawing on semiotic, relational, and multimodal perspectives, we outline how materiality, rhythm, and affective attunement function as core dimensions through which communication emerges. Instead of treating gestures or words as sudden cognitive leaps, these forms are better seen as visible consolidations of longer histories of embodied coordination. Triadic encounters thus reveal communication as a distributed and situated ecology, shaped not only by the infant's initiative but also by the caregiver's configurational role and the affordances of objects and environments.</div><div>The implications of this reconceptualization extend beyond developmental psychology. By reframing communication as relational and processual, we open interdisciplinary connections with philosophy of mind, cognitive science, and educational theory. We also highlight the need for methodological approaches that can capture the temporally extended and multimodal dynamics of everyday interaction. Overall, this article proposes a shift in how early communication is defined, studied, and supported: not as the achievement of individual skills, but as the generative ground of human meaning-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145738447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Breaking the chains of independence: A Bayesian uncertainty model of normative violations in human causal probabilistic reasoning 打破独立链：人类因果概率推理中违反规范的贝叶斯不确定性模型

IF 2.9 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

New Ideas in Psychology

Pub Date : 2025-12-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101231

Sergio E. Chaigneau , Nicolás Marchant , Bob Rehder

Empirical research in causal and probabilistic reasoning has revealed systematic deviations from normative principles, often interpreted as biases. We present the Bayesian Uncertainty Model (BUM), a computational approach that explains these deviations through Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA). BUM posits that people do not reason with a single causal model but instead weigh multiple hypotheses, incorporating uncertainty into their probabilistic inferences. Our mathematical derivations demonstrate that this mixture process necessarily disrupts independence constraints, naturally generating well-known causal reasoning normative violations such as Markov violations with generative and independent causes, and weak explaining away effects. Additionally, BUM accounts for negative Markov violations and conservatism by assuming that individuals often consider an uninformative baseline model alongside the provided causal structure. This formulation provides an alternative to existing models that account for normative violations and challenges the notion that deviations from normative principles reflect irrationality or cognitive limitations. Instead, BUM suggests that human causal reasoning reflects an adaptive response to ambiguity, shaping causal probabilistic judgments in systematic and predictable ways.

因果和概率推理的实证研究揭示了对规范原则的系统性偏差，通常被解释为偏差。我们提出了贝叶斯不确定性模型（BUM），这是一种通过贝叶斯模型平均（BMA）解释这些偏差的计算方法。BUM认为，人们不会用单一的因果模型进行推理，而是权衡多个假设，将不确定性纳入他们的概率推理。我们的数学推导表明，这种混合过程必然会破坏独立性约束，自然会产生众所周知的因果推理规范违规，例如具有生成和独立原因的马尔可夫违规，以及弱解释效应。此外，通过假设个体经常考虑与提供的因果结构一起的无信息基线模型，BUM解释了负马尔可夫违规和保守性。这一表述为现有模型提供了另一种选择，这些模型解释了违反规范的情况，并挑战了偏离规范原则反映非理性或认知限制的概念。相反，BUM认为人类因果推理反映了对模糊性的适应性反应，以系统和可预测的方式形成因果概率判断。

{"title":"Breaking the chains of independence: A Bayesian uncertainty model of normative violations in human causal probabilistic reasoning","authors":"Sergio E. Chaigneau , Nicolás Marchant , Bob Rehder","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101231","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101231","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Empirical research in causal and probabilistic reasoning has revealed systematic deviations from normative principles, often interpreted as biases. We present the Bayesian Uncertainty Model (BUM), a computational approach that explains these deviations through Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA). BUM posits that people do not reason with a single causal model but instead weigh multiple hypotheses, incorporating uncertainty into their probabilistic inferences. Our mathematical derivations demonstrate that this mixture process necessarily disrupts independence constraints, naturally generating well-known causal reasoning normative violations such as Markov violations with generative and independent causes, and weak explaining away effects. Additionally, BUM accounts for negative Markov violations and conservatism by assuming that individuals often consider an uninformative baseline model alongside the provided causal structure. This formulation provides an alternative to existing models that account for normative violations and challenges the notion that deviations from normative principles reflect irrationality or cognitive limitations. Instead, BUM suggests that human causal reasoning reflects an adaptive response to ambiguity, shaping causal probabilistic judgments in systematic and predictable ways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145685599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Symbolic narratives and embodied selves: Exploring identity and affective expression in neurodivergent youth 符号叙事与具身自我：探索神经发散青年的身份与情感表达

IF 2.9 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

New Ideas in Psychology

Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101232

Miriam Belluzzo , Veronica Giaquinto , Vittoria Molisso

This study explores how neurodivergent young adults with psychiatric, developmental, and intellectual disabilities construct symbolic self-representations through a multimodal narrative-visual workshop using evocative image cards. Conducted in an inclusive and semi-structured setting with 12 participants, the workshop enabled participants to explore themes of identity, emotional growth, and relationality through metaphorical language, visual association, and affective dialogue.

Thematic analysis revealed a dense constellation of symbolic self-constructions and narrative improvisations, including ambivalent emotional states, fragmented self-images, fantastical identifications, and internalized cultural scripts. The use of symbolic proxies—animals, celestial bodies, archetypal figures—enabled participants to express embodied affect, relational positioning, and developmental transitions beyond conventional communicative modes. The self emerged not as fixed, but as relational, visually mediated, and emotionally negotiated.

Drawing on embodiment theory, narrative psychology, and disability studies, the paper conceptualizes these narratives as acts of creative authorship and affective epistemology. Rather than treating symbolic discontinuities as clinical deficits, they are reframed as expressive resources for navigating vulnerability, internal conflict, and social norms. This research affirms the narrative agency of neurodivergent individuals and emphasizes the value of symbolic, visual, and affective spaces for inclusive psychosocial practice.

本研究探讨了患有精神、发育和智力障碍的神经分化青年如何通过使用唤起性图像卡的多模态叙事-视觉工作坊来构建象征性的自我表征。研讨会在一个包容的半结构化环境中进行，共有12名参与者，通过隐喻语言、视觉联想和情感对话，使参与者能够探索身份、情感成长和关系的主题。主题分析揭示了密集的符号自我建构和叙事即兴，包括矛盾的情感状态、碎片化的自我形象、幻想的认同和内化的文化脚本。使用象征性代理——动物、天体、原型人物——使参与者能够表达具身情感、关系定位和超越传统交流模式的发展过渡。自我的出现不是固定的，而是关系的，视觉上的调解，情感上的协商。本文借鉴化身理论、叙事心理学和残疾研究，将这些叙事概念化为创造性创作行为和情感认识论。而不是将象征性的不连续性视为临床缺陷，它们被重新定义为导航脆弱性，内部冲突和社会规范的表达资源。本研究肯定了神经分化个体的叙事代理，并强调了符号、视觉和情感空间对包容性心理社会实践的价值。

{"title":"Symbolic narratives and embodied selves: Exploring identity and affective expression in neurodivergent youth","authors":"Miriam Belluzzo , Veronica Giaquinto , Vittoria Molisso","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101232","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101232","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores how neurodivergent young adults with psychiatric, developmental, and intellectual disabilities construct symbolic self-representations through a multimodal narrative-visual workshop using evocative image cards. Conducted in an inclusive and semi-structured setting with 12 participants, the workshop enabled participants to explore themes of identity, emotional growth, and relationality through metaphorical language, visual association, and affective dialogue.</div><div>Thematic analysis revealed a dense constellation of symbolic self-constructions and narrative improvisations, including ambivalent emotional states, fragmented self-images, fantastical identifications, and internalized cultural scripts. The use of symbolic proxies—animals, celestial bodies, archetypal figures—enabled participants to express embodied affect, relational positioning, and developmental transitions beyond conventional communicative modes. The self emerged not as fixed, but as relational, visually mediated, and emotionally negotiated.</div><div>Drawing on embodiment theory, narrative psychology, and disability studies, the paper conceptualizes these narratives as acts of creative authorship and affective epistemology. Rather than treating symbolic discontinuities as clinical deficits, they are reframed as expressive resources for navigating vulnerability, internal conflict, and social norms. This research affirms the narrative agency of neurodivergent individuals and emphasizes the value of symbolic, visual, and affective spaces for inclusive psychosocial practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145665381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The brain edits the past: Neural systems of memory reconstruction and self-stability 大脑编辑过去：记忆重建和自我稳定的神经系统

IF 2.9 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

New Ideas in Psychology

Pub Date : 2025-11-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101221

Max Lepsius

Autobiographical memory is increasingly understood as a constructive process governed by goal-directed neural mechanisms rather than as a passive retrieval of historically accurate content. In this article, I propose that memory serves an adaptive, identity-regulating function by maintaining the coherence of the self-model. Drawing on evidence from systems neuroscience, I argue that memory retrieval and reconsolidation are modulated by top-down control processes that prioritize internal consistency over factual accuracy.

Specifically, I examine the role of the default mode network (DMN) — particularly the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) — in the selective retrieval of experiences aligned with current self-conceptual structures. I further discuss the hippocampus–prefrontal cortex interaction as a mechanism for emphasizing congruent details while suppressing contradictory information. This filtering is often mediated by schema-based frameworks that facilitate the encoding and reassembly of memory traces according to present needs and motivational states. Evidence from reconsolidation studies demonstrates the neuroplastic instability of recalled memories, enabling their restructuring to serve current psychological needs.

I conclude that memory is less a system for veridical preservation than a neurocognitive instrument for internal stabilization. Its selective architecture supports the coherence of self through strategic reconstruction, with implications for our understanding of autobiographical memory, affective disorders, and the neural substrates of identity stability.

自传式记忆越来越被理解为一个由目标导向的神经机制控制的建设性过程，而不是对历史准确内容的被动检索。在这篇文章中，我提出记忆通过维持自我模型的一致性来提供一种适应性的身份调节功能。根据系统神经科学的证据，我认为记忆检索和再巩固是由自上而下的控制过程调节的，这种控制过程优先考虑内部一致性而不是事实准确性。具体来说，我研究了默认模式网络（DMN）——特别是内侧前额叶皮层（mPFC）和后扣带皮层（PCC）——在选择性检索与当前自我概念结构一致的经验中的作用。我进一步讨论海马体-前额叶皮层的相互作用作为强调一致的细节，同时抑制矛盾的信息的机制。这种过滤通常是由基于模式的框架来调节的，这些框架有助于根据当前需求和动机状态对记忆痕迹进行编码和重组。来自再巩固研究的证据表明，被召回的记忆具有神经可塑性的不稳定性，这使得它们的重组能够满足当前的心理需求。我的结论是，记忆与其说是一种真实的保存系统，不如说是一种内部稳定的神经认知工具。它的选择性结构通过战略性重建来支持自我的一致性，这对我们理解自传体记忆、情感障碍和身份稳定性的神经基质具有重要意义。

{"title":"The brain edits the past: Neural systems of memory reconstruction and self-stability","authors":"Max Lepsius","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101221","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101221","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Autobiographical memory is increasingly understood as a constructive process governed by goal-directed neural mechanisms rather than as a passive retrieval of historically accurate content. In this article, I propose that memory serves an adaptive, identity-regulating function by maintaining the coherence of the self-model. Drawing on evidence from systems neuroscience, I argue that memory retrieval and reconsolidation are modulated by top-down control processes that prioritize internal consistency over factual accuracy.</div><div>Specifically, I examine the role of the default mode network (DMN) — particularly the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) — in the selective retrieval of experiences aligned with current self-conceptual structures. I further discuss the hippocampus–prefrontal cortex interaction as a mechanism for emphasizing congruent details while suppressing contradictory information. This filtering is often mediated by schema-based frameworks that facilitate the encoding and reassembly of memory traces according to present needs and motivational states. Evidence from reconsolidation studies demonstrates the neuroplastic instability of recalled memories, enabling their restructuring to serve current psychological needs.</div><div>I conclude that memory is less a system for veridical preservation than a neurocognitive instrument for internal stabilization. Its selective architecture supports the coherence of self through strategic reconstruction, with implications for our understanding of autobiographical memory, affective disorders, and the neural substrates of identity stability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 101221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145623680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0