Does employability help to cope with job insecurity? An analysis of workers' well-being with Swiss panel data

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Research in Social Stratification and Mobility Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100915
Leandro Ivan Canzio
{"title":"Does employability help to cope with job insecurity? An analysis of workers' well-being with Swiss panel data","authors":"Leandro Ivan Canzio","doi":"10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Can perceived employability mitigate the negative impacts of job insecurity on wellbeing?. We address this question using fixed-effects models on panel data from. Switzerland. To measure job insecurity, we use two subjective indicators (risk of job. loss and fear of job loss in the last year) and an objective one (having a temporary contract). We assess well-being by studying job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and mental health, and perform separate analyses for men and women. Results suggest that employability does not mitigate the impacts of job insecurity on job satisfaction. For life satisfaction, employability reduces the impacts of the risk of job loss in the last year, but only among men. Regarding mental health, employability partially offsets the impacts of the risk of job loss in the last year for both men and women. We conclude that even though employability might help, it does not shield workers from the negative impacts of job insecurity. This suggests that the flexicurity strategy falls short of mitigating the non-pecuniary impacts of job insecurity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47384,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 100915"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562424000283/pdfft?md5=c7c68e3e955b11ee52d8aef674d596f7&pid=1-s2.0-S0276562424000283-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562424000283","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Can perceived employability mitigate the negative impacts of job insecurity on wellbeing?. We address this question using fixed-effects models on panel data from. Switzerland. To measure job insecurity, we use two subjective indicators (risk of job. loss and fear of job loss in the last year) and an objective one (having a temporary contract). We assess well-being by studying job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and mental health, and perform separate analyses for men and women. Results suggest that employability does not mitigate the impacts of job insecurity on job satisfaction. For life satisfaction, employability reduces the impacts of the risk of job loss in the last year, but only among men. Regarding mental health, employability partially offsets the impacts of the risk of job loss in the last year for both men and women. We conclude that even though employability might help, it does not shield workers from the negative impacts of job insecurity. This suggests that the flexicurity strategy falls short of mitigating the non-pecuniary impacts of job insecurity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
就业能力是否有助于应对工作不稳定?利用瑞士面板数据分析工人的幸福感
可感知的就业能力能否减轻工作不稳定对幸福感的负面影响?我们使用固定效应模型对以下国家的面板数据进行了分析。瑞士。为了衡量工作不稳定程度,我们使用了两个主观指标(失业风险和对去年失业的恐惧)和一个客观指标(签订临时合同)。我们通过研究工作满意度、生活满意度和心理健康来评估幸福感,并分别对男性和女性进行分析。结果表明,就业能力并不能减轻工作不稳定对工作满意度的影响。在生活满意度方面,就业能力降低了过去一年中失业风险的影响,但仅限于男性。在心理健康方面,就业能力部分抵消了最近一年失业风险对男性和女性的影响。我们的结论是,尽管就业能力可能有所帮助,但它并不能使劳动者免受工作不稳定的负面影响。这表明,灵活保障战略未能减轻工作不稳定带来的非金钱影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility is dedicated to publishing the highest, most innovative research on issues of social inequality from a broad diversity of theoretical and methodological perspectives. The journal is also dedicated to cutting edge summaries of prior research and fruitful exchanges that will stimulate future research on issues of social inequality. The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists.
期刊最新文献
The distribution of privately held business assets in the United States The U-turn in educational inequality. Why a multidimensional approach matters for measuring social inequalities in tertiary educational attainment Intergenerational poverty persistence in Europe – Is there a ‘Great Gatsby Curve’ for poverty? Beauty pays, but not under all circumstances: Evidence on gendered hiring discrimination from a novel experimental treatment using deepfakes Earnings mobility across three generations of natives in Finland: A comparison of Finnish and Swedish speakers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1