Where Does the Black–White Life Expectancy Gap Come From? The Deadly Consequences of Residential Segregation

IF 4.6 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Population and Development Review Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1111/padr.12625
Arun S. Hendi
{"title":"Where Does the Black–White Life Expectancy Gap Come From? The Deadly Consequences of Residential Segregation","authors":"Arun S. Hendi","doi":"10.1111/padr.12625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The disparity in life expectancy between white and black Americans exceeds five years for men and three years for women. While prior research has investigated the roles of healthcare, health behaviors, biological risk, socioeconomic status, and life course effects on black mortality, the literature on the geographic origins of the gap is more limited. This study examines how the black–white life expectancy gap varies across counties and how much of the national gap is attributable to within-county racial inequality versus differences between counties. The estimates suggest that over 90 percent of the national gap can be attributed to within-county factors. Using a quasi-experimental research design, I find that black–white residential segregation increases the gap by approximately 16 years for men and five years for women. The segregation effect loads heavily on causes of death associated with access to and quality of healthcare; safety and violence; and public health measures. Residential segregation does not appear to operate through health behaviors or individual-level factors but instead acts primarily through institutional mechanisms. Efforts to address racial disparities in mortality should focus on reducing racial residential segregation or reducing inequalities in the mechanisms through which residential segregation acts: public services, employment opportunities, and community resources.","PeriodicalId":51372,"journal":{"name":"Population and Development Review","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population and Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The disparity in life expectancy between white and black Americans exceeds five years for men and three years for women. While prior research has investigated the roles of healthcare, health behaviors, biological risk, socioeconomic status, and life course effects on black mortality, the literature on the geographic origins of the gap is more limited. This study examines how the black–white life expectancy gap varies across counties and how much of the national gap is attributable to within-county racial inequality versus differences between counties. The estimates suggest that over 90 percent of the national gap can be attributed to within-county factors. Using a quasi-experimental research design, I find that black–white residential segregation increases the gap by approximately 16 years for men and five years for women. The segregation effect loads heavily on causes of death associated with access to and quality of healthcare; safety and violence; and public health measures. Residential segregation does not appear to operate through health behaviors or individual-level factors but instead acts primarily through institutional mechanisms. Efforts to address racial disparities in mortality should focus on reducing racial residential segregation or reducing inequalities in the mechanisms through which residential segregation acts: public services, employment opportunities, and community resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑人与白人的预期寿命差距从何而来?住宅隔离的致命后果
美国白人和黑人的预期寿命差距超过了男性 5 岁,女性 3 岁。虽然之前的研究已经调查了医疗保健、健康行为、生物风险、社会经济地位和生命过程对黑人死亡率的影响,但有关差距的地理来源的文献却比较有限。本研究探讨了黑人与白人的预期寿命差距在各县之间的差异,以及全国差距中有多少是由于县内种族不平等和县与县之间的差异造成的。估计结果表明,全国差距的 90% 以上可归因于县内因素。利用准实验研究设计,我发现黑人-白人居住区的隔离使男性的差距扩大了约 16 年,女性的差距扩大了约 5 年。隔离效应主要体现在与获得医疗服务的机会和质量、安全和暴力以及公共卫生措施相关的死亡原因上。居住隔离似乎不是通过健康行为或个人层面的因素发挥作用,而是主要通过制度机制发挥作用。解决种族死亡率差异的努力应侧重于减少种族居住隔离或减少居住隔离作用机制中的不平等:公共服务、就业机会和社区资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Population and Development Review is essential reading to keep abreast of population studies, research on the interrelationships between population and socioeconomic change, and related thinking on public policy. Its interests span both developed and developing countries, theoretical advances as well as empirical analyses and case studies, a broad range of disciplinary approaches, and concern with historical as well as present-day problems.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Women's Empowerment and Contraception The Globalization of International Migration? A Conceptual and Data‐Driven Synthesis Contraceptive Change and Fertility Transition The Next 2 Billion: Can the World Support 10 Billion People? The Potential of Internal Migration to Shape Rural and Urban Populations Across Africa, Asia, and Latin America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1