Olga M Fajardo, Ekaterina Grebenyuk, Katherine F Chaves, Zhiguo Zhao, Tan Ding, Howard L Curlin, Lara F B Harvey
{"title":"Impact of trainees involvement on surgical outcomes of abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy.","authors":"Olga M Fajardo, Ekaterina Grebenyuk, Katherine F Chaves, Zhiguo Zhao, Tan Ding, Howard L Curlin, Lara F B Harvey","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2024.2330697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine the association of trainees involvement with surgical outcomes of abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy including operative time, rate of transfusion, and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of 1145 patients who underwent an abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy from 2008-2012 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 64% of myomectomies involved trainees. Trainees involvement was associated with a longer operative time for abdominal myomectomies (mean difference 20.17 minutes, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [11.37,28.97], <i>p</i> < 0.01) overall and when stratified by fibroid burden. For laparoscopic myomectomy, there was no difference in operative time between trainees vs no trainees involvement (mean difference 4.64 minutes, 95% CI [-18.07,27.35], <i>p</i> = 0.67). There was a higher rate of transfusion with trainees involvement for abdominal myomectomies (10% vs 2%, <i>p</i> < 0.01; Odds Ratio (OR) 5.62, 95% CI [2.53,12.51], <i>p</i> < 0.01). Trainees involvement was not found to be associated with rate of transfusion for laparoscopic myomectomy (4% vs 5%, <i>p</i> = 0.86; OR 0.82, 95% CI [0.16,4.14], <i>p</i> = 0.81). For abdominal myomectomy, there was a higher rate of overall complications (15% vs 5%, <i>p</i> < 0.01; OR 2.96, 95% CI [1.77,4.93], <i>p</i> < 0.01) and minor complications (14% vs 4%, <i>p</i> < 0.01; OR 3.71, 95% CI [2.09,6.57], <i>p</i> < 0.01) with no difference in major complications (3% vs 2%, p = 0.23). For laparoscopic myomectomy, there was no difference in overall (6% vs 10% <i>p</i> = 0.41; OR 0.59, 95% CI [0.18,2.01], <i>p</i> = 0.40), major (2% vs 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.38), or minor (5% vs 10%, <i>p</i> = 0.32; OR 0.52, 95% CI [0.15,1.79], <i>p</i> = 0.30) complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trainees involvement was associated with increased operative time, rate of transfusion, and complications for abdominal myomectomy, however, did not impact surgical outcomes for laparoscopic myomectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"44 1","pages":"2330697"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2024.2330697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To determine the association of trainees involvement with surgical outcomes of abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy including operative time, rate of transfusion, and complications.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 1145 patients who underwent an abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy from 2008-2012 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2).
Results: Overall, 64% of myomectomies involved trainees. Trainees involvement was associated with a longer operative time for abdominal myomectomies (mean difference 20.17 minutes, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [11.37,28.97], p < 0.01) overall and when stratified by fibroid burden. For laparoscopic myomectomy, there was no difference in operative time between trainees vs no trainees involvement (mean difference 4.64 minutes, 95% CI [-18.07,27.35], p = 0.67). There was a higher rate of transfusion with trainees involvement for abdominal myomectomies (10% vs 2%, p < 0.01; Odds Ratio (OR) 5.62, 95% CI [2.53,12.51], p < 0.01). Trainees involvement was not found to be associated with rate of transfusion for laparoscopic myomectomy (4% vs 5%, p = 0.86; OR 0.82, 95% CI [0.16,4.14], p = 0.81). For abdominal myomectomy, there was a higher rate of overall complications (15% vs 5%, p < 0.01; OR 2.96, 95% CI [1.77,4.93], p < 0.01) and minor complications (14% vs 4%, p < 0.01; OR 3.71, 95% CI [2.09,6.57], p < 0.01) with no difference in major complications (3% vs 2%, p = 0.23). For laparoscopic myomectomy, there was no difference in overall (6% vs 10% p = 0.41; OR 0.59, 95% CI [0.18,2.01], p = 0.40), major (2% vs 0%, p = 0.38), or minor (5% vs 10%, p = 0.32; OR 0.52, 95% CI [0.15,1.79], p = 0.30) complications.
Conclusion: Trainees involvement was associated with increased operative time, rate of transfusion, and complications for abdominal myomectomy, however, did not impact surgical outcomes for laparoscopic myomectomy.
背景:旨在确定受训人员参与腹腔镜和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术与手术结果(包括手术时间、输血率和并发症)之间的关系:目的:确定受训人员的参与与腹腔镜和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的手术结果(包括手术时间、输血率和并发症)之间的关系:方法:使用美国外科学院国家手术质量改进计划数据库(加拿大工作组分类 II-2)对 2008-2012 年间接受腹腔镜或腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的 1145 名患者进行回顾性队列研究:结果:总体而言,64%的子宫肌瘤切除术有受训人员参与。受训人员的参与与腹部肌瘤切除术的手术时间延长有关(平均差异为20.17分钟,95%置信区间(CI)[11.37,28.97],P = 0.67)。受训人员参与腹部肌瘤切除术的输血率更高(10% vs 2%,P = 0.86;OR 0.82,95% CI [0.16,4.14],P = 0.81)。就腹部肌瘤切除术而言,总体并发症(15% vs 5%,p p p p = 0.41;OR 0.59,95% CI [0.18,2.01],p = 0.40)、主要并发症(2% vs 0%,p = 0.38)或轻微并发症(5% vs 10%,p = 0.32;OR 0.52,95% CI [0.15,1.79],p = 0.30)的发生率均较高:受训人员的参与与腹部子宫肌瘤切除术的手术时间、输血率和并发症的增加有关,但对腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的手术效果没有影响。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.