{"title":"Enhancing postpartum hemorrhage training by integrating case-problem based learning with simulation: a quasi experimental study.","authors":"Yike Yang, Zhichao Guo, Xiaoyue Guo, Yangyu Zhao","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2024.2443617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide, and effective training in PPH rescue techniques is crucial. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combining case-based learning (CBL) and problem-based learning (PBL) with simulation teaching methods in improving midwifery trainees' technical proficiency in managing PPH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quasi-experimental study involved 76 trainees who received PPH training at Peking University Third Hospital from March to July 2023. They were divided into two groups: the control group (<i>n</i> = 50) followed traditional simulation training methods, and the research group (<i>n</i> = 26) used a combination of CBL-PBL and scenario simulation. After the training, all participants completed a theoretical examination and questionnaire to assess their satisfaction with the program and self-assessment of clinical management skills in PPH. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-tests and chi-square tests to compare the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combination of CBL-PBL and scenario simulation was highly satisfactory compared to traditional simulation training, significantly enhancing self-assessed skills in clinical thinking (100% vs. 61.8%, <i>p</i> = .03), operant skills related to PPH (100% vs. 57.4%, <i>p</i> < .01), relevant knowledge pertaining to PPH (100% vs. 58.7%, <i>p</i> < .01), and management abilities (97.1% vs. 39%, <i>p</i> < .01) among midwifery trainees in the research group, who also scored significantly higher on post-training assessments of PPH knowledge than control groups(91.7 ± 6.0 vs 76.0 ± 7.1, <i>p</i> < .01). A majority of trainees expressed a preference for regular simulation exercises (98.7%) and detailed discussions on PPH cases (93.4%) in future training sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining CBL-PBL with simulation practice is a more effective teaching method for PPH management training in maternity staffs with a certain level of clinical experience, compared to traditional methods. Future studies should explore the implementation of regular PPH rescue skill training in real clinical settings to support these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"45 1","pages":"2443617"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2024.2443617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide, and effective training in PPH rescue techniques is crucial. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combining case-based learning (CBL) and problem-based learning (PBL) with simulation teaching methods in improving midwifery trainees' technical proficiency in managing PPH.
Methods: This quasi-experimental study involved 76 trainees who received PPH training at Peking University Third Hospital from March to July 2023. They were divided into two groups: the control group (n = 50) followed traditional simulation training methods, and the research group (n = 26) used a combination of CBL-PBL and scenario simulation. After the training, all participants completed a theoretical examination and questionnaire to assess their satisfaction with the program and self-assessment of clinical management skills in PPH. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-tests and chi-square tests to compare the groups.
Results: The combination of CBL-PBL and scenario simulation was highly satisfactory compared to traditional simulation training, significantly enhancing self-assessed skills in clinical thinking (100% vs. 61.8%, p = .03), operant skills related to PPH (100% vs. 57.4%, p < .01), relevant knowledge pertaining to PPH (100% vs. 58.7%, p < .01), and management abilities (97.1% vs. 39%, p < .01) among midwifery trainees in the research group, who also scored significantly higher on post-training assessments of PPH knowledge than control groups(91.7 ± 6.0 vs 76.0 ± 7.1, p < .01). A majority of trainees expressed a preference for regular simulation exercises (98.7%) and detailed discussions on PPH cases (93.4%) in future training sessions.
Conclusion: Combining CBL-PBL with simulation practice is a more effective teaching method for PPH management training in maternity staffs with a certain level of clinical experience, compared to traditional methods. Future studies should explore the implementation of regular PPH rescue skill training in real clinical settings to support these findings.
背景:产后出血(PPH)是全球孕产妇死亡的主要原因,有效的PPH抢救技术培训至关重要。本研究旨在评估案例学习(CBL)与问题学习(PBL)相结合的模拟教学方法对提高助产学学员管理PPH的技术熟练程度的效果。方法:对2023年3月至7月在北京大学第三医院接受PPH培训的76名学员进行准实验研究。将其分为两组,对照组(n = 50)采用传统模拟训练方法,研究组(n = 26)采用CBL-PBL与情景模拟相结合的训练方法。培训结束后,所有参与者完成了理论考试和问卷调查,以评估他们对课程的满意度和PPH临床管理技能的自我评估。采用非配对t检验和卡方检验进行统计学分析。结果:与传统模拟培训相比,CBL-PBL与情景模拟相结合的培训效果较好,临床思维自我评估技能(100% vs. 61.8%, p = .03)、PPH相关操作技能(100% vs. 57.4%, p p p p p p结论:CBL-PBL与模拟实习相结合的教学方法对具有一定临床经验的产科人员进行PPH管理培训较传统方法更有效。未来的研究应探索在实际临床环境中实施常规PPH急救技能培训,以支持这些发现。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.