Positive Outliers: A Mixed Methods Study of Resiliency to Childhood Obesity in High-Risk Neighborhoods

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Academic Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2024.03.011
{"title":"Positive Outliers: A Mixed Methods Study of Resiliency to Childhood Obesity in High-Risk Neighborhoods","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Despite the high prevalence of obesity and the clustering of risk by neighborhood, few studies have examined characteristics which promote healthy child weight in neighborhoods with high obesity risk. We aimed to identify protective factors for children living in neighborhoods with high obesity risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>We identified neighborhoods with high obesity risk using geolocated electronic health record data with measured </span>body mass index (BMI) from well-child visits (2012–2017). We then recruited caregivers with children aged 5 to 13 years who lived in census tracts with mean child BMI percentile ≥72 (February 2020–August 2021). We used sequential mixed methods (quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews) to compare individual, interpersonal, and perceived neighborhood factors among families with children at a healthy weight (positive outliers [PO]) versus families with ≥1 child with overweight or obesity (controls). Regression models and comparative qualitative analysis were used to identify protective characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy-three caregivers participated in the quantitative phase (41% PO; 34% preferred Spanish) and twenty in the qualitative phase (50% PO; 50% preferred Spanish). The frequency of healthy caregiver behaviors was associated with being a PO (Family Health Behavior Scale Parent Score adjusted β 3.67; 95% CI 0.52–6.81 and qualitative data). Protective factors also included caregivers’ ability to minimize the negative health influences of family members and adhere to family routines.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There were few differences between PO and control families. Support for caregiver healthy habits and adherence to healthy family routines emerged as opportunities for childhood obesity prevention in neighborhoods with high obesity risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":"24 8","pages":"Pages 1256-1265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285924001104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Despite the high prevalence of obesity and the clustering of risk by neighborhood, few studies have examined characteristics which promote healthy child weight in neighborhoods with high obesity risk. We aimed to identify protective factors for children living in neighborhoods with high obesity risk.

Methods

We identified neighborhoods with high obesity risk using geolocated electronic health record data with measured body mass index (BMI) from well-child visits (2012–2017). We then recruited caregivers with children aged 5 to 13 years who lived in census tracts with mean child BMI percentile ≥72 (February 2020–August 2021). We used sequential mixed methods (quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews) to compare individual, interpersonal, and perceived neighborhood factors among families with children at a healthy weight (positive outliers [PO]) versus families with ≥1 child with overweight or obesity (controls). Regression models and comparative qualitative analysis were used to identify protective characteristics.

Results

Seventy-three caregivers participated in the quantitative phase (41% PO; 34% preferred Spanish) and twenty in the qualitative phase (50% PO; 50% preferred Spanish). The frequency of healthy caregiver behaviors was associated with being a PO (Family Health Behavior Scale Parent Score adjusted β 3.67; 95% CI 0.52–6.81 and qualitative data). Protective factors also included caregivers’ ability to minimize the negative health influences of family members and adhere to family routines.

Conclusions

There were few differences between PO and control families. Support for caregiver healthy habits and adherence to healthy family routines emerged as opportunities for childhood obesity prevention in neighborhoods with high obesity risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极的异常值:高风险社区儿童肥胖复原力的混合方法研究。
目的:尽管肥胖症的发病率很高,而且肥胖症的风险因社区而异,但很少有研究探讨在肥胖症高风险社区中促进儿童健康体重的特征。我们的目的是找出生活在肥胖高风险社区的儿童的保护因素:我们利用地理定位的电子健康记录数据和儿童健康检查(2012-2017 年)中测量的体重指数 (BMI),确定了肥胖高风险社区。然后,我们招募了有 5-13 岁儿童的看护人,他们居住在儿童平均 BMI 百分位数大于 72 的人口普查区(2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 8 月)。我们采用连续的混合方法(定量调查、定性访谈),比较有健康体重儿童的家庭(正离群值,PO)与有≥1 名超重或肥胖儿童的家庭(对照组)的个人、人际和感知的邻里因素。采用回归模型和比较定性分析来确定保护性特征:73名照顾者参与了定量阶段(41%为PO;34%喜欢西班牙语),20名照顾者参与了定性阶段(50%为PO;50%喜欢西班牙语)。照顾者的健康行为频率与成为 PO 相关(家庭健康行为量表家长评分调整 β 3.67;95% CI 0.52-6.81 和定性数据)。保护性因素还包括照顾者尽量减少家庭成员对健康的负面影响和遵守家庭常规的能力:PO 家庭与对照家庭之间几乎没有差异。新发现:在儿童肥胖高风险社区,有健康体重儿童的家庭和有超重/肥胖儿童的家庭在行为和社会方面都很相似。在儿童所处的环境中,父母对健康行为的示范和支持可促进儿童体重健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
期刊最新文献
A Narrative Review of Key Studies in Medical Education in 2023: Applying the Current Literature to Educational Practice and Scholarship. My Father's Daughter and Doctor. Quality Initiative to Increase Early Initiation and Series Completion of HPV Vaccine and its Impact on Health Disparities. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Insufficient Sleep. An Untold Story: The Feelings of Pediatric Residents Early in the Covid-19 Pandemic and What They Can Teach Us Today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1