Exploring associations between the Big Five personality traits and cognitive ability with COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and uptake among mothers and offspring in a UK prospective cohort study

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccine Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.018
Jennifer Condie , Kate Northstone , Daniel Major-Smith , Isaac Halstead
{"title":"Exploring associations between the Big Five personality traits and cognitive ability with COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and uptake among mothers and offspring in a UK prospective cohort study","authors":"Jennifer Condie ,&nbsp;Kate Northstone ,&nbsp;Daniel Major-Smith ,&nbsp;Isaac Halstead","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Vaccines reduce the severity of symptoms, and risk of hospitalisation and death from infectious diseases. Yet, vaccination hesitancy persists. Research identifying psychological risk factors for vaccination hesitancy is limited and reports conflicting results. This study sought to address these inconsistencies and explore the role of personality and cognitive ability in COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and uptake in a prospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data came from young adults (Generation-1; G1) and their mothers (Generation-0; G0) in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Multinomial logistic regressions, adjusting for several sociodemographic confounders, were used to explore whether personality and cognitive ability were associated with COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and uptake. 4,960 G1 and 4,853 G0 mothers were included in the study population.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Among G1, 38.4% exhibited vaccination hesitancy, yet 91.9% of the cohort received the vaccine. In adjusted models, higher levels of openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and cognitive ability were associated with an increased probability of wanting the vaccine. Similarly, higher levels of agreeableness, openness and cognitive ability were associated with an increased probability of vaccination uptake. However, the evidence of associations with vaccine uptake were generally weaker than with vaccination hesitancy. 56.7% of the offspring who did not want the vaccine either received the vaccine or intended to, whilst 43.3% still had no intention.<!--> <!-->Among G0 mothers, 25.6% were vaccination hesitant, yet 99.0% of the cohort received the vaccine. 3.1% said they did not want the vaccine; approximately 80% of these either received the vaccine or intended to. We found inconclusive evidence for an association between cognitive ability and vaccination hesitancy among G0 mothers.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>This study identified psychological factors associated with vaccination hesitancy and uptake. If these associations are causal, these findings may help design more effective vaccination hesitancy interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"42 11","pages":"Pages 2817-2826"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24003050/pdfft?md5=2727b9a039da81b126c2a6672c8b8cfa&pid=1-s2.0-S0264410X24003050-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24003050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vaccines reduce the severity of symptoms, and risk of hospitalisation and death from infectious diseases. Yet, vaccination hesitancy persists. Research identifying psychological risk factors for vaccination hesitancy is limited and reports conflicting results. This study sought to address these inconsistencies and explore the role of personality and cognitive ability in COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and uptake in a prospective cohort study.

Methods

Data came from young adults (Generation-1; G1) and their mothers (Generation-0; G0) in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Multinomial logistic regressions, adjusting for several sociodemographic confounders, were used to explore whether personality and cognitive ability were associated with COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and uptake. 4,960 G1 and 4,853 G0 mothers were included in the study population.

Findings

Among G1, 38.4% exhibited vaccination hesitancy, yet 91.9% of the cohort received the vaccine. In adjusted models, higher levels of openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and cognitive ability were associated with an increased probability of wanting the vaccine. Similarly, higher levels of agreeableness, openness and cognitive ability were associated with an increased probability of vaccination uptake. However, the evidence of associations with vaccine uptake were generally weaker than with vaccination hesitancy. 56.7% of the offspring who did not want the vaccine either received the vaccine or intended to, whilst 43.3% still had no intention. Among G0 mothers, 25.6% were vaccination hesitant, yet 99.0% of the cohort received the vaccine. 3.1% said they did not want the vaccine; approximately 80% of these either received the vaccine or intended to. We found inconclusive evidence for an association between cognitive ability and vaccination hesitancy among G0 mothers.

Interpretation

This study identified psychological factors associated with vaccination hesitancy and uptake. If these associations are causal, these findings may help design more effective vaccination hesitancy interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英国的一项前瞻性队列研究中,探索五大性格特征和认知能力与母亲和后代的 COVID-19 疫苗接种犹豫和接种率之间的关系。
背景:疫苗可降低传染病的症状严重程度、住院和死亡风险。然而,疫苗接种犹豫不决的现象依然存在。有关疫苗接种犹豫不决的心理风险因素的研究十分有限,报告的结果也相互矛盾。本研究试图解决这些矛盾,并在一项前瞻性队列研究中探讨人格和认知能力在 COVID-19 疫苗接种犹豫和接种中的作用:数据来自雅芳父母与子女纵向研究(ALSPAC)中的年轻成年人(第一代;G1)及其母亲(第二代-0;G0)。在对几种社会人口学混杂因素进行调整后,我们使用多项式逻辑回归来探讨性格和认知能力是否与 COVID-19 疫苗接种犹豫不决和接种率有关。研究对象包括 4,960 名 G1 和 4,853 名 G0 母亲:在 G1 群体中,38.4% 的人表现出接种犹豫,但 91.9% 的人接种了疫苗。在调整模型中,开放性、合意性、自觉性和认知能力水平越高,想要接种疫苗的可能性越大。同样,较高水平的合意性、开放性和认知能力也与接种疫苗的概率增加有关。然而,与疫苗接种犹豫不决相比,与疫苗接种相关的证据普遍较弱。在不想接种疫苗的后代中,56.7%的人接种了疫苗或打算接种疫苗,43.3%的人仍然没有接种疫苗的意向。3.1%的母亲表示不想接种疫苗;其中约 80% 的母亲接种了疫苗或打算接种疫苗。我们发现,在 G0 母亲中,认知能力与疫苗接种犹豫之间存在关联,但证据并不确凿:本研究发现了与疫苗接种犹豫和接种率相关的心理因素。如果这些关联是因果关系,那么这些发现可能有助于设计更有效的疫苗接种犹豫干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Sustained superior humoral immune responses of mRNA vaccines compared to Sputnik V viral vector COVID-19 vaccines in naïve and convalescent populations” [Vaccine 70 (2026) 128018] Association of parental vaccination readiness and descriptive norms with childhood vaccination status Child sexual abuse and adult vaccination: Opposing patterns between routine and pandemic vaccines in a Nationwide survey Protecting infants from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in Ireland: Impact of a national nirsevimab immunisation programme, 2024/2025 Vaccination under sedation in children with needle phobia or behavioural difficulties: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1