My Discussions of Quantum Foundations with John Stewart Bell

IF 0.9 4区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Foundations of Science Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s10699-024-09946-z
Marian Kupczynski
{"title":"My Discussions of Quantum Foundations with John Stewart Bell","authors":"Marian Kupczynski","doi":"10.1007/s10699-024-09946-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 1976, I met John Bell several times in CERN and we talked about a possible violation of optical theorem, purity tests, EPR paradox, Bell’s inequalities and their violation. In this review, I resume our discussions, and explain how they were related to my earlier research. I also reproduce handwritten notes, which I gave to Bell during our first meeting and a handwritten letter he sent to me in 1982. We have never met again, but I have continued to discuss BI-CHSH inequalities and their violation in several papers. The research stimulated by Bell’s papers and experiments performed to check his inequalities led to several important applications of quantum entanglement in quantum information and quantum technologies. Unfortunately, it led also to extraordinary metaphysical claims and speculations which in our opinion John Bell would not endorse today. BI-CHSH inequalities are violated in physics and in cognitive science, but it neither proved the completeness of quantum mechanics nor its nonlocality. Quantum computing advantage is not due to some magical instantaneous influences between distant physical systems. Therefore one has to be <i>cautious in drawing-far-reaching philosophical conclusions from Bell’s inequalities</i>. The true resource for quantum computing is contextuality and not nonlocality.</p>","PeriodicalId":55146,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-024-09946-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1976, I met John Bell several times in CERN and we talked about a possible violation of optical theorem, purity tests, EPR paradox, Bell’s inequalities and their violation. In this review, I resume our discussions, and explain how they were related to my earlier research. I also reproduce handwritten notes, which I gave to Bell during our first meeting and a handwritten letter he sent to me in 1982. We have never met again, but I have continued to discuss BI-CHSH inequalities and their violation in several papers. The research stimulated by Bell’s papers and experiments performed to check his inequalities led to several important applications of quantum entanglement in quantum information and quantum technologies. Unfortunately, it led also to extraordinary metaphysical claims and speculations which in our opinion John Bell would not endorse today. BI-CHSH inequalities are violated in physics and in cognitive science, but it neither proved the completeness of quantum mechanics nor its nonlocality. Quantum computing advantage is not due to some magical instantaneous influences between distant physical systems. Therefore one has to be cautious in drawing-far-reaching philosophical conclusions from Bell’s inequalities. The true resource for quantum computing is contextuality and not nonlocality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我与约翰-斯图尔特-贝尔关于量子基础的讨论
1976 年,我在欧洲核子研究中心多次遇到约翰-贝尔,我们讨论了光学定理的可能违反、纯度测试、EPR 悖论、贝尔不等式及其违反。在这篇评论中,我恢复了我们的讨论,并解释了这些讨论与我早期研究的关系。我还转载了我们第一次见面时我给贝尔的手写笔记,以及他在 1982 年寄给我的一封手写信件。我们再也没有见过面,但我在多篇论文中继续讨论了 BI-CHSH 不等式及其违反情况。贝尔的论文和为验证其不等式而进行的实验激发了人们的研究热情,并促成了量子纠缠在量子信息和量子技术领域的多项重要应用。不幸的是,它也导致了非同寻常的形而上学主张和猜测,我们认为约翰-贝尔今天不会赞同这些主张和猜测。BI-CHSH 不等式在物理学和认知科学中都被违反了,但它既没有证明量子力学的完备性,也没有证明量子力学的非局域性。量子计算的优势并不是因为遥远的物理系统之间存在某种神奇的瞬时影响。因此,从贝尔不等式中得出意义深远的哲学结论必须谨慎。量子计算的真正资源是情境性,而不是非位置性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foundations of Science
Foundations of Science HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Foundations of Science focuses on methodological and philosophical topics of foundational significance concerning the structure and the growth of science. It serves as a forum for exchange of views and ideas among working scientists and theorists of science and it seeks to promote interdisciplinary cooperation. Since the various scientific disciplines have become so specialized and inaccessible to workers in different areas of science, one of the goals of the journal is to present the foundational issues of science in a way that is free from unnecessary technicalities yet faithful to the scientific content. The aim of the journal is not simply to identify and highlight foundational issues and problems, but to suggest constructive solutions to the problems. The editors of the journal admit that various sciences have approaches and methods that are peculiar to those individual sciences. However, they hold the view that important truths can be discovered about and by the sciences and that truths transcend cultural and political contexts. Although properly conducted historical and sociological inquiries can explain some aspects of the scientific enterprise, the editors believe that the central foundational questions of contemporary science can be posed and answered without recourse to sociological or historical methods.
期刊最新文献
On the Received View Versus the Alternative View Controversy About Quantum (Non)individuality The Return of Realism in the Logos Approach to Quantum Mechanics (Reply to Arroyo and Arenhart) Wigner and Friends, A Map is not the Territory! Contextuality in Multi-agent Paradoxes Curiosity, Awe and Wonder: The Emotions that Open Our Mind On the Neo-Empiricist Thesis and Historicity of Science: Enriques and Neurath
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1