Sense-aware connective-based indices of cohesion and their relationship to cohesion ratings of English language learners’ written production

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Studies in Second Language Acquisition Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1017/s0272263124000202
Xiaofei Lu, Renfen Hu
{"title":"Sense-aware connective-based indices of cohesion and their relationship to cohesion ratings of English language learners’ written production","authors":"Xiaofei Lu, Renfen Hu","doi":"10.1017/s0272263124000202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of connectives has been considered important for assessing the cohesion of written texts (Crossley et al., 2019). However, existing connective-based indices have not systematically addressed two issues of ambiguity, namely, that between discourse and non-discourse use of polysemous word forms and that in terms of the specific discourse relations marked by polysemous discourse connectives (Pitler & Nenkova, 2009). This study proposes 34 sense-aware connective-based indices of cohesion that account for these issues and assesses their predictive power for cohesion ratings in comparison to 25 existing indices. Results from the analysis of 3,911 argumentative essays from the English Language Learner Insight, Proficiency and Skills Evaluation Corpus show that 23 sense-aware indices but only three existing indices correlated significantly and meaningfully with cohesion ratings. The sense-aware indices also exhibited greater predictive power for cohesion ratings than existing indices. The implications of our findings for future cohesion research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263124000202","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of connectives has been considered important for assessing the cohesion of written texts (Crossley et al., 2019). However, existing connective-based indices have not systematically addressed two issues of ambiguity, namely, that between discourse and non-discourse use of polysemous word forms and that in terms of the specific discourse relations marked by polysemous discourse connectives (Pitler & Nenkova, 2009). This study proposes 34 sense-aware connective-based indices of cohesion that account for these issues and assesses their predictive power for cohesion ratings in comparison to 25 existing indices. Results from the analysis of 3,911 argumentative essays from the English Language Learner Insight, Proficiency and Skills Evaluation Corpus show that 23 sense-aware indices but only three existing indices correlated significantly and meaningfully with cohesion ratings. The sense-aware indices also exhibited greater predictive power for cohesion ratings than existing indices. The implications of our findings for future cohesion research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于感知连接词的内聚力指数及其与英语学习者书面表达内聚力评分的关系
连接词的使用被认为对评估书面文本的内聚力非常重要(Crossley 等人,2019 年)。然而,现有的基于连接词的指数并未系统地解决两个模糊问题,即多义词词形的话语和非话语使用之间的模糊问题,以及多义词话语连接词所标记的特定话语关系方面的模糊问题(Pitler & Nenkova, 2009)。本研究针对这些问题提出了 34 个基于意义感知连接词的内聚力指数,并与现有的 25 个指数相比,评估了它们对内聚力评分的预测能力。对英语语言学习者洞察力、能力和技能评估语料库中的 3,911 篇议论文进行分析的结果表明,23 个感性认识指数与内聚力评分有显著的相关性,而现有指数中只有 3 个与内聚力评分有意义的相关性。与现有指数相比,语感感知指数对内聚力评分的预测能力也更强。本文讨论了我们的发现对未来内聚力研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Studies in Second Language Acquisition is a refereed journal of international scope devoted to the scientific discussion of acquisition or use of non-native and heritage languages. Each volume (five issues) contains research articles of either a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods nature in addition to essays on current theoretical matters. Other rubrics include shorter articles such as Replication Studies, Critical Commentaries, and Research Reports.
期刊最新文献
Bilingualism and flexibility in task switching: A close replication study Acceptance and engagement patterns of mobile-assisted language learning among non-conventional adult L2 learners: A survival analysis Coherence and Comprehensibility in Second Language Speakers’ Academic Speaking Performance The Interplay of Mindsets, Aptitude, Grit, and Language Achievement: What Role Does Gender Play? Statistical Insignificance is not wholesale transfer in L3 Acquisition: an approximate replication of Rothman (2011)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1