An observational study of teachers' and students' behaviors in synchronous online classrooms

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1108/jarhe-07-2023-0277
Carlos González, Daniel Ponce
{"title":"An observational study of teachers' and students' behaviors in synchronous online classrooms","authors":"Carlos González, Daniel Ponce","doi":"10.1108/jarhe-07-2023-0277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims first to describe the most prevalent teachers’ and students’ behaviors in synchronous online classes in emergency remote teaching; second, to discern behavior profiles and third, to investigate what features explain the observed behaviors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>An adapted COPUS observation protocol was employed to observe 292 online classes from 146 higher education teachers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The most prevalent behaviors were: Presenting for teachers and Receiving for students, followed by Teachers Guiding and Students Talking to Class. Furthermore, cluster analysis showed two groups: Traditional and Interactive. The variables that better explained belonging to the Interactive lecture group were disciplinary area – social sciences and humanities –and teaching in technical institutions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>In a context where higher education institutions intend to project the lessons learned into post-pandemic learning experiences, this study provides observational evidence to realize the full potential expected from online and blended teaching and learning.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Despite the prevalence of synchronous online lectures during COVID-19, there is a paucity of observational studies on the actual behaviors that occurred in this context. Most research has been based on surveys and interviews. This study addresses this gap.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45508,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-07-2023-0277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims first to describe the most prevalent teachers’ and students’ behaviors in synchronous online classes in emergency remote teaching; second, to discern behavior profiles and third, to investigate what features explain the observed behaviors.

Design/methodology/approach

An adapted COPUS observation protocol was employed to observe 292 online classes from 146 higher education teachers.

Findings

The most prevalent behaviors were: Presenting for teachers and Receiving for students, followed by Teachers Guiding and Students Talking to Class. Furthermore, cluster analysis showed two groups: Traditional and Interactive. The variables that better explained belonging to the Interactive lecture group were disciplinary area – social sciences and humanities –and teaching in technical institutions.

Practical implications

In a context where higher education institutions intend to project the lessons learned into post-pandemic learning experiences, this study provides observational evidence to realize the full potential expected from online and blended teaching and learning.

Originality/value

Despite the prevalence of synchronous online lectures during COVID-19, there is a paucity of observational studies on the actual behaviors that occurred in this context. Most research has been based on surveys and interviews. This study addresses this gap.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同步在线课堂中师生行为的观察研究
目的本文首先旨在描述紧急远程教学中同步在线课堂上最普遍的教师和学生行为;其次,辨别行为特征;第三,研究哪些特征可以解释观察到的行为:最普遍的行为是:教师展示和学生接收,其次是教师引导和学生与课堂交谈。此外,聚类分析还显示出两个组别:传统组和互动组。本研究为充分发挥在线和混合式教学的潜力提供了观察证据。原创性/价值尽管在 COVID-19 期间同步在线授课非常普遍,但有关在这种情况下发生的实际行为的观察研究却很少。大多数研究都是基于调查和访谈。本研究填补了这一空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Higher education around the world has become a major topic of discussion, debate, and controversy, as a range of political, economic, social, and technological pressures result in a myriad of changes at all levels. But the quality and quantity of critical dialogue and research and their relationship with practice remains limited. This internationally peer-reviewed journal addresses this shortfall by focusing on the scholarship and practice of teaching and learning and higher education and covers: - Higher education teaching, learning, curriculum, assessment, policy, management, leadership, and related areas - Digitization, internationalization, and democratization of higher education, and related areas such as lifelong and lifewide learning - Innovation, change, and reflections on current practices
期刊最新文献
Improving students’ academic integrity through academic integrity training (AIT) program in higher education Adapting accounting education to evolving business paradigm-an Indian perspective Second language writing anxiety and ChatGPT adoption as an automated writing evaluation tool Remote learning and exploring the factors affecting students' adoption of behavioral intentions toward conference applications Locus of control, academic procrastination and academic performance amongst university students: moderating role of parental involvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1