A rapid review of the effectiveness of interventions for addressing digital exclusion in older adults

Alesha Wale, Jordan Everitt, Toby Ayres, Chukwudi Okolie, Helen Morgan, Hannah Shaw, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Jacob Davies, Ruth Lewis, Alison Cooper, Adrian Edwards
{"title":"A rapid review of the effectiveness of interventions for addressing digital exclusion in older adults","authors":"Alesha Wale, Jordan Everitt, Toby Ayres, Chukwudi Okolie, Helen Morgan, Hannah Shaw, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Jacob Davies, Ruth Lewis, Alison Cooper, Adrian Edwards","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.21.24304670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Older adults constitute the largest proportion of non-users of the internet. With the increasing digitalisation of services, in particular those provided by Social Care Wales, it is important to understand how best to support older adults to overcome the challenges they face with accessing or engaging with the digital world (for personal use). This rapid review aimed to assess the effectiveness of interventions to address digital exclusion in older adults (aged 60 years and above). Digital exclusion can occur due to issues with motivation (if people do not see why the internet might be beneficial), accessibility (unable to physically access to the internet), ability (lack of skills to use the internet) or affordability (unable to afford access to the internet) of digital technology. Research Implications and Evidence Gaps\nThe majority of studies included in this review were of low quality. It is unclear whether study findings would be generalisable to the UK. Outcome measures were heterogeneous across studies making it difficult to compare findings directly. Only one study assessed the cost-effectiveness of a digital education intervention. No study reported on interventions to address language barriers, for example, that may be experienced by people whose first language is not English. No study focused specifically on interventions to improve access to, or affordability of the internet and digital technologies to overcome digital exclusion. Further high-quality UK-based research is needed to better understand the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions for addressing digital exclusion in older adults. Policy and Practice Implications\nThis rapid review highlighted the potential benefits of a range of complex multi-component educational interventions, particularly with regards to improving digital literacy, and suggests that older adults are accepting of these interventions. To reduce digital exclusion in older adults, evidence suggests it may be important to ensure structural barriers, such as access to the internet and affordability of devices are removed. However, the cost of provision should be considered and assessed. Educational interventions may help to reduce perceptual barriers regarding digital technologies that contribute to digital exclusion including lack of confidence, fear and anxiety, or perceived lack of abilities. It is important to consider that older adults should be equipped with the skills to make an informed choice to interact with essential services physically (offline) or digitally. With the increasing digitalisation of services, it is important that older members of the community who do not wish to use digital technologies, are not left behind or disadvantaged.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":"2015 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.21.24304670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older adults constitute the largest proportion of non-users of the internet. With the increasing digitalisation of services, in particular those provided by Social Care Wales, it is important to understand how best to support older adults to overcome the challenges they face with accessing or engaging with the digital world (for personal use). This rapid review aimed to assess the effectiveness of interventions to address digital exclusion in older adults (aged 60 years and above). Digital exclusion can occur due to issues with motivation (if people do not see why the internet might be beneficial), accessibility (unable to physically access to the internet), ability (lack of skills to use the internet) or affordability (unable to afford access to the internet) of digital technology. Research Implications and Evidence Gaps The majority of studies included in this review were of low quality. It is unclear whether study findings would be generalisable to the UK. Outcome measures were heterogeneous across studies making it difficult to compare findings directly. Only one study assessed the cost-effectiveness of a digital education intervention. No study reported on interventions to address language barriers, for example, that may be experienced by people whose first language is not English. No study focused specifically on interventions to improve access to, or affordability of the internet and digital technologies to overcome digital exclusion. Further high-quality UK-based research is needed to better understand the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions for addressing digital exclusion in older adults. Policy and Practice Implications This rapid review highlighted the potential benefits of a range of complex multi-component educational interventions, particularly with regards to improving digital literacy, and suggests that older adults are accepting of these interventions. To reduce digital exclusion in older adults, evidence suggests it may be important to ensure structural barriers, such as access to the internet and affordability of devices are removed. However, the cost of provision should be considered and assessed. Educational interventions may help to reduce perceptual barriers regarding digital technologies that contribute to digital exclusion including lack of confidence, fear and anxiety, or perceived lack of abilities. It is important to consider that older adults should be equipped with the skills to make an informed choice to interact with essential services physically (offline) or digitally. With the increasing digitalisation of services, it is important that older members of the community who do not wish to use digital technologies, are not left behind or disadvantaged.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速审查解决老年人数字排斥问题的干预措施的有效性
在未使用互联网的人群中,老年人所占比例最大。随着服务的日益数字化,尤其是威尔士社会医疗机构提供的服务,了解如何最好地支持老年人克服他们在访问或参与数字世界(个人使用)时所面临的挑战非常重要。本次快速审查旨在评估解决老年人(60 岁及以上)数字排斥问题的干预措施的有效性。出现数字排斥的原因可能是数字技术的动机问题(如果人们不明白为什么互联网可能有益)、可访问性问题(无法实际访问互联网)、能力问题(缺乏使用互联网的技能)或可负担性问题(无法负担访问互联网的费用)。研究意义和证据差距本综述中包含的大多数研究质量不高。目前尚不清楚研究结果是否适用于英国。不同研究的结果衡量标准不尽相同,因此很难对研究结果进行直接比较。只有一项研究评估了数字教育干预措施的成本效益。没有研究报告了针对语言障碍的干预措施,例如,母语不是英语的人可能会遇到的语言障碍。没有一项研究特别关注为克服数字排斥而采取的干预措施,这些干预措施旨在改善互联网和数字技术的可及性或可负担性。需要进一步开展基于英国的高质量研究,以更好地了解解决老年人数字排斥问题的干预措施的有效性和成本效益。政策与实践启示 本次快速审查强调了一系列复杂的多成分教育干预措施的潜在益处,尤其是在提高数字素养方面,并表明老年人接受这些干预措施。有证据表明,要减少老年人的数字排斥,必须确保消除结构性障碍,如互联网接入和设备的可负担性。不过,也应考虑和评估提供设备的成本。教育干预措施可能有助于减少造成数字排斥的数字技术方面的观念障碍,包括缺乏信心、恐惧和焦虑,或认为自己缺乏能力。重要的是要考虑到,老年人应掌握技能,在知情的情况下选择与基本服务进行实体(离线)或数字互动。随着服务数字化程度的不断提高,重要的是社区中不愿意使用数字技术的老年人不会被落下或处于不利地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"WE CAN ALL CONTRIBUTE IN OUR OWN WAY" : KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION TOOLS TO PROMOTE BEST PRACTICES IN UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY Geospatial Analysis of the Association between Medicaid Ex-pansion, Minimum Wage Policies, and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Prevalence in the United States The clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing continence issues resulting from birth trauma: a rapid review Supporting women, girls and people who menstruate to participate in physical activity - Rapid evidence summary Performance of the Washington Group Questions in Measuring Blindness and Deafness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1