Local terrestrial biodiversity impacts in life cycle assessment: A case study of sedum roofs in London, UK

IF 4.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Industrial Ecology Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1111/jiec.13482
Adam R. Mason, Pepe Puchol-Salort, Alfred Gathorne-Hardy, Barbara Maria Smith, Rupert J. Myers
{"title":"Local terrestrial biodiversity impacts in life cycle assessment: A case study of sedum roofs in London, UK","authors":"Adam R. Mason,&nbsp;Pepe Puchol-Salort,&nbsp;Alfred Gathorne-Hardy,&nbsp;Barbara Maria Smith,&nbsp;Rupert J. Myers","doi":"10.1111/jiec.13482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urban development is a key driver of global biodiversity loss. “Green” infrastructure is integrated to offset some impacts of development on ecosystem quality by supporting urban biodiversity, a prominent example being green roofs. The effects of green infrastructures on urban biodiversity are not well understood and poorly included in life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Here, we present a novel methodology that quantifies the local impact of green infrastructures on terrestrial biodiversity—demonstrated here for sedum roofs in London, UK—and integrates within LCA. It relates energy provision by plants to the metabolic requirements of animals to determine what species richness (number of species) and species abundance (number of individuals) are supported. We demonstrate this methodology using a case study, comparing the life cycle impact of developing 18 buildings, with either asphalt concrete or sedum roofs, on ecosystem quality. We found the sedum roofs (0.018 km<sup>2</sup>) support 53 species (673 individuals), equivalent to 1.3% of the development's life cycle impacts on ecosystem quality. Complete offsetting requires considerable reduction in transport use throughout the development's lifetime, and lower environmental impact material selection during construction (contributing 98% and 2%, respectively). The results indicate sedum roofs offer minor impact mitigation capacities in the context of urban development, and this capacity is limited for all green infrastructures by species richness in local species pools. This paper demonstrates the potential and limitations of quantifying terrestrial biodiversity offsets offered by green infrastructures alongside urbanization, and the need for realistic expectations of what role it might play in sustainable urban design.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"28 3","pages":"496-511"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.13482","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.13482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban development is a key driver of global biodiversity loss. “Green” infrastructure is integrated to offset some impacts of development on ecosystem quality by supporting urban biodiversity, a prominent example being green roofs. The effects of green infrastructures on urban biodiversity are not well understood and poorly included in life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Here, we present a novel methodology that quantifies the local impact of green infrastructures on terrestrial biodiversity—demonstrated here for sedum roofs in London, UK—and integrates within LCA. It relates energy provision by plants to the metabolic requirements of animals to determine what species richness (number of species) and species abundance (number of individuals) are supported. We demonstrate this methodology using a case study, comparing the life cycle impact of developing 18 buildings, with either asphalt concrete or sedum roofs, on ecosystem quality. We found the sedum roofs (0.018 km2) support 53 species (673 individuals), equivalent to 1.3% of the development's life cycle impacts on ecosystem quality. Complete offsetting requires considerable reduction in transport use throughout the development's lifetime, and lower environmental impact material selection during construction (contributing 98% and 2%, respectively). The results indicate sedum roofs offer minor impact mitigation capacities in the context of urban development, and this capacity is limited for all green infrastructures by species richness in local species pools. This paper demonstrates the potential and limitations of quantifying terrestrial biodiversity offsets offered by green infrastructures alongside urbanization, and the need for realistic expectations of what role it might play in sustainable urban design.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生命周期评估对当地陆地生物多样性的影响:英国伦敦沉香屋顶案例研究
城市发展是全球生物多样性丧失的主要驱动因素。"绿色 "基础设施通过支持城市生物多样性来抵消发展对生态系统质量的一些影响,绿色屋顶就是一个突出的例子。人们对绿色基础设施对城市生物多样性的影响了解不多,也很少将其纳入生命周期评估(LCA)方法中。在此,我们介绍一种新方法,该方法可量化绿色基础设施对陆地生物多样性的局部影响--以英国伦敦的沉香屋顶为例,并将其纳入生命周期评估。该方法将植物提供的能量与动物的新陈代谢需求联系起来,以确定支持的物种丰富度(物种数量)和物种丰度(个体数量)。我们通过一个案例研究展示了这一方法,比较了采用沥青混凝土或沉木屋顶的 18 栋建筑物对生态系统质量的生命周期影响。我们发现,沉木屋顶(0.018 平方公里)支持 53 个物种(673 个个体),相当于开发项目生命周期对生态系统质量影响的 1.3%。要完全抵消这些影响,需要在开发项目的整个生命周期内大量减少运输使用,并在施工过程中选择对环境影响较小的材料(分别占 98% 和 2%)。结果表明,在城市发展的背景下,沉香屋顶具有较小的影响减缓能力,而对于所有绿色基础设施来说,这种能力都受到当地物种库中物种丰富程度的限制。本文展示了量化绿色基础设施在城市化过程中提供的陆地生物多样性补偿的潜力和局限性,以及对其在可持续城市设计中可能发挥的作用进行现实预期的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information, Cover, and Table of Contents Prospective life cycle assessment of climate and biodiversity impacts of meat‐based and plant‐forward meals: A case study of Indonesian and German meal options Unpacking the path toward a sustainable circular economy through industrial ecology An integrated urban metabolism and ecosystem service assessment: The case study of Lima, Peru Additive inclusion in plastic life cycle assessments part I: Review of mechanical recycling studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1