Seed bank and aboveground vegetation of Atlantic Forest re-growing on mining tailings in Mariana: Highlighting diversity patterns of functional groups

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Ecological Research Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1111/1440-1703.12453
Sebastião Venâncio Martins, Aline Pilocelli, Gabriel Correa Kruschewsky, Andreia Aparecida Dias, Fabio Haruki Nabeta, Pedro Manuel Villa
{"title":"Seed bank and aboveground vegetation of Atlantic Forest re-growing on mining tailings in Mariana: Highlighting diversity patterns of functional groups","authors":"Sebastião Venâncio Martins,&nbsp;Aline Pilocelli,&nbsp;Gabriel Correa Kruschewsky,&nbsp;Andreia Aparecida Dias,&nbsp;Fabio Haruki Nabeta,&nbsp;Pedro Manuel Villa","doi":"10.1111/1440-1703.12453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Natural regeneration after mining activities depends largely on the soil seed bank (SSB) and aboveground vegetation (AGV) richness and composition. We evaluated the species diversity pattern of the SSB and AGV on soil and technosol across second-growth Atlantic Forests (SGFs) after mining tailings deposition in Mariana, southeastern Brazil. Two second-growth Atlantic seasonal semideciduous forests of different stand ages were selected: a 3-year-old stand of SGF re-growing on tailings (SGF tailings) and a 30-year-old stand of native reference forest not affected by tailings (SGF nontailings). Overall, the results showed significant differences in forest attributes (species richness and composition) in the SSB and AGV between the two forest patches evaluated (SGF tailings and SGF nontailings). Moreover, both nonzoochoric and zoochoric dispersed species of AGV showed significant differences between second-growth forests, with higher variability of community-weighted mean in SGF tailings. The result shows smaller differences in species richness between forest types for both SBB (ranging 85 and 90 species) and AGV (~55 species). Despite the time difference between the secondary forest and the absence of zoochoric species in the tailings seed bank, the AGV that are re-growing on mining tailings presented a high proportion of zoochoric species. This pattern of species richness and community composition variability observed in the technosol seed bank, and AGV that are re-growing after the deposition of mining tailings are important recovery indicators for plant communities affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":11434,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Research","volume":"39 3","pages":"289-302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1703.12453","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural regeneration after mining activities depends largely on the soil seed bank (SSB) and aboveground vegetation (AGV) richness and composition. We evaluated the species diversity pattern of the SSB and AGV on soil and technosol across second-growth Atlantic Forests (SGFs) after mining tailings deposition in Mariana, southeastern Brazil. Two second-growth Atlantic seasonal semideciduous forests of different stand ages were selected: a 3-year-old stand of SGF re-growing on tailings (SGF tailings) and a 30-year-old stand of native reference forest not affected by tailings (SGF nontailings). Overall, the results showed significant differences in forest attributes (species richness and composition) in the SSB and AGV between the two forest patches evaluated (SGF tailings and SGF nontailings). Moreover, both nonzoochoric and zoochoric dispersed species of AGV showed significant differences between second-growth forests, with higher variability of community-weighted mean in SGF tailings. The result shows smaller differences in species richness between forest types for both SBB (ranging 85 and 90 species) and AGV (~55 species). Despite the time difference between the secondary forest and the absence of zoochoric species in the tailings seed bank, the AGV that are re-growing on mining tailings presented a high proportion of zoochoric species. This pattern of species richness and community composition variability observed in the technosol seed bank, and AGV that are re-growing after the deposition of mining tailings are important recovery indicators for plant communities affected.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在马里亚纳采矿尾矿上重新生长的大西洋森林的种子库和地上植被:突出功能群的多样性模式
采矿活动后的自然再生在很大程度上取决于土壤种子库(SSB)和地上植被(AGV)的丰富程度和组成。我们评估了巴西东南部马里亚纳采矿尾矿沉积后大西洋次生林(SGFs)土壤和技术溶胶上的 SSB 和 AGV 的物种多样性模式。研究人员选择了两片不同树龄的大西洋季节性半落叶次生林:一片在尾矿上重新生长的 3 年树龄的次生林(SGF 尾矿)和一片未受尾矿影响的 30 年树龄的原生参考林(SGF 非尾矿)。总体而言,研究结果表明,所评估的两个森林斑块(尾矿 SGF 和非尾矿 SGF)在 SSB 和 AGV 的森林属性(物种丰富度和组成)方面存在显著差异。此外,AGV 中的非动物散布物种和动物散布物种在次生林之间存在显著差异,在 SGF 尾矿中群落加权平均值的变异性更高。结果显示,SBB(85 至 90 种)和 AGV(约 55 种)的物种丰富度在不同森林类型之间的差异较小。尽管与次生林之间存在时间差,而且尾矿种子库中也没有动物园物种,但在采矿尾矿上重新生长的 AGV 却呈现出较高比例的动物园物种。在技术溶胶种子库中观察到的这种物种丰富度和群落组成变异模式,以及在采矿尾矿沉积后重新生长的 AGV 是受影响植物群落的重要恢复指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Research
Ecological Research 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Research has been published in English by the Ecological Society of Japan since 1986. Ecological Research publishes original papers on all aspects of ecology, in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Spatiotemporal interactions between jaguars (Panthera onca) and their potential prey in Amazonian islands Seed dispersal of Zoysia japonica by sika deer: An example of the “foliage is the fruit” hypothesis From anthropogenic toward natural acidification: Effects of future deposition and climate on recovery in a humic catchment in Norway Phenotyping of the nickel metal crop Bornmuellera emarginata for establishing breeding selection criteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1