AI recommendations’ impact on individual and social practices of Generation Z on social media: a comparative analysis between Estonia, Italy, and the Netherlands

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Semiotica Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1515/sem-2023-0089
Daria Arkhipova, Marijn Janssen
{"title":"AI recommendations’ impact on individual and social practices of Generation Z on social media: a comparative analysis between Estonia, Italy, and the Netherlands","authors":"Daria Arkhipova, Marijn Janssen","doi":"10.1515/sem-2023-0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media (SM) influence young adults’ communication practices. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used for making recommendations on SM. Yet, its effects on different generations of SM users are unknown. SM can use AI recommendations to sort texts and prioritize them, shaping users’ online and offline experiences. Current literature primarily addresses technological or human-user perspectives, overlooking cognitive perspectives. This research aims to propose methods for mapping users’ interactions with AI recommendations (AiRS) and analyzes how embodied interactions mediated by a digital agent can lead to changes in social and cultural practices. For this, this work proposes a comparative analysis of central practices evoked by AI recommendations-mediated communication on SM among users in Italy, Estonia, and the Netherlands in the age category 18–26 years old. The data used in the comparative analysis was collected via semi-structured interviews and elaborated based on cognitive psychology and semiotics. This research highlights the contextual significance of AI recommendations as a mediator in creating new communication practices. Findings confirm that young adults often choose practices that would enhance their digital representations according to AiRS’ dominant patterns and categories. AiRS impacts individual interpretations and practices and can further affect social and cultural levels.","PeriodicalId":47288,"journal":{"name":"Semiotica","volume":"303 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semiotica","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2023-0089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media (SM) influence young adults’ communication practices. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used for making recommendations on SM. Yet, its effects on different generations of SM users are unknown. SM can use AI recommendations to sort texts and prioritize them, shaping users’ online and offline experiences. Current literature primarily addresses technological or human-user perspectives, overlooking cognitive perspectives. This research aims to propose methods for mapping users’ interactions with AI recommendations (AiRS) and analyzes how embodied interactions mediated by a digital agent can lead to changes in social and cultural practices. For this, this work proposes a comparative analysis of central practices evoked by AI recommendations-mediated communication on SM among users in Italy, Estonia, and the Netherlands in the age category 18–26 years old. The data used in the comparative analysis was collected via semi-structured interviews and elaborated based on cognitive psychology and semiotics. This research highlights the contextual significance of AI recommendations as a mediator in creating new communication practices. Findings confirm that young adults often choose practices that would enhance their digital representations according to AiRS’ dominant patterns and categories. AiRS impacts individual interpretations and practices and can further affect social and cultural levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能建议对 Z 世代在社交媒体上的个人和社会实践的影响:爱沙尼亚、意大利和荷兰之间的比较分析
社交媒体(SM)影响着年轻人的交流方式。人工智能(AI)越来越多地被用于在社交媒体上进行推荐。然而,人工智能对不同年代的社交媒体用户的影响尚不清楚。SM可以利用人工智能推荐对文本进行分类和优先排序,从而影响用户的在线和离线体验。目前的文献主要从技术或人类用户的角度进行研究,忽略了认知角度。本研究旨在提出绘制用户与人工智能推荐(AiRS)互动图的方法,并分析以数字代理为媒介的体现互动如何导致社会和文化实践的变化。为此,本研究对意大利、爱沙尼亚和荷兰 18-26 岁年龄段用户在 SM 上以人工智能推荐为媒介的交流所引发的核心实践进行了比较分析。比较分析中使用的数据是通过半结构式访谈收集的,并以认知心理学和符号学为基础进行了阐述。这项研究强调了人工智能建议作为创造新交流方式的中介所具有的背景意义。研究结果证实,年轻人通常会根据 AiRS 的主导模式和类别选择能增强其数字表征的做法。AiRS 会影响个人的解释和实践,并进一步影响社会和文化层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Semiotica
Semiotica Multiple-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
37.50%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Semiotica, the Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, founded in 1969, appears in five volumes of four issues per year, in two languages (English and French), and occasionally in German. Semiotica features articles reporting results of research in all branches of semiotic studies, in-depth reviews of selected current literature in this field, and occasional guest editorials and reports. From time to time, Special Issues, devoted to topics of particular interest, are assembled by Guest Editors. The publishers of Semiotica offer an annual prize, the Mouton d"Or, to the author of the best article each year. The article is selected by an independent international jury.
期刊最新文献
An edusemiotic approach to teaching intonation in the context of English language teacher education Cultural semiotics for mathematical discourses Cultivating critical language awareness: unraveling populism in Trump’s inaugural address Computer creates a cat: sign formation, glitching, and the AImage Ethnosemantic analysis of binary oppositions in toposystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1