George W. Uetz, Rachel Gilbert, Rebecca Wilson, Jacqueline Mann, Joseph Macedonia, David L. Clark
{"title":"Background contrast affects detection and recognition of courting wolf spiders by intended and unintended receivers","authors":"George W. Uetz, Rachel Gilbert, Rebecca Wilson, Jacqueline Mann, Joseph Macedonia, David L. Clark","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03453-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We used video playback of courting male <i>Schizocosa ocreata</i> wolf spiders to examine responses of intended receivers (conspecific females) and eavesdroppers (competitor males, predatory spiders, toads) to manipulations of spider color (natural color, monochromatic gray, monochromatic RBG average) displayed against complex leaf litter backgrounds (color, grayscale). Models of chromatic and achromatic contrast between spider stimuli and backgrounds were used to predict receiver responses. The results support the hypothesis that interactions between spider and background coloration affect detection and recognition, although responses varied with receiver type. Detection responses of intended receivers (female <i>S. ocreata</i>) did not fit predictions of the chromatic contrast model in some cases, but showed a fair fit to the achromatic model. Detection responses of social eavesdroppers (male <i>S. ocreata</i>) fit the chromatic and achromatic contrast models slightly better than did female responses (poor fit and very good fit, respectively). Eavesdropping wolf spider predators (<i>Rabidosa</i>) exhibited detection responses that significantly matched predictions of the chromatic (very good fit) and achromatic (excellent fit) models. Whereas jumping spiders (<i>Phidippus</i>) showed a good fit to the chromatic and achromatic contrast models, toad predators had a good fit only to the chromatic model. Recognition responses revealed a different pattern of fit to the chromatic and achromatic models across receiver types, although <i>Rabidosa</i> again indicated a significant fit to both models. Taken together, the results of this study identify both chromatic and achromatic features of spider appearance as likely explanations for differences in behavioral responses of intended and unintended receivers. This outcome suggests the possibility that both sexual and natural selection likely target different features of male appearance during courtship.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03453-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We used video playback of courting male Schizocosa ocreata wolf spiders to examine responses of intended receivers (conspecific females) and eavesdroppers (competitor males, predatory spiders, toads) to manipulations of spider color (natural color, monochromatic gray, monochromatic RBG average) displayed against complex leaf litter backgrounds (color, grayscale). Models of chromatic and achromatic contrast between spider stimuli and backgrounds were used to predict receiver responses. The results support the hypothesis that interactions between spider and background coloration affect detection and recognition, although responses varied with receiver type. Detection responses of intended receivers (female S. ocreata) did not fit predictions of the chromatic contrast model in some cases, but showed a fair fit to the achromatic model. Detection responses of social eavesdroppers (male S. ocreata) fit the chromatic and achromatic contrast models slightly better than did female responses (poor fit and very good fit, respectively). Eavesdropping wolf spider predators (Rabidosa) exhibited detection responses that significantly matched predictions of the chromatic (very good fit) and achromatic (excellent fit) models. Whereas jumping spiders (Phidippus) showed a good fit to the chromatic and achromatic contrast models, toad predators had a good fit only to the chromatic model. Recognition responses revealed a different pattern of fit to the chromatic and achromatic models across receiver types, although Rabidosa again indicated a significant fit to both models. Taken together, the results of this study identify both chromatic and achromatic features of spider appearance as likely explanations for differences in behavioral responses of intended and unintended receivers. This outcome suggests the possibility that both sexual and natural selection likely target different features of male appearance during courtship.
我们利用狼蛛求偶雄蛛的视频回放,研究了目标接收者(同种雌蛛)和窃听者(竞争雄蛛、捕食蛛、蟾蜍)对复杂叶丛背景(彩色、灰度)下蜘蛛颜色(自然色、单色灰色、单色 RBG 平均值)的反应。蜘蛛刺激物和背景之间的色度和消色差模型被用来预测接收者的反应。结果支持蜘蛛与背景颜色之间的相互作用会影响检测和识别的假设,尽管反应随接收者类型的不同而不同。意向接收者(雌性 S. ocreata)的检测反应在某些情况下不符合色度对比模型的预测,但与消色差模型相当吻合。社会窃听者(雄性狼蛛)的探测反应与色度和消色差对比度模型的拟合程度略好于雌性狼蛛(分别为拟合程度较差和拟合程度很好)。偷听的狼蛛捕食者(Rabidosa)的探测反应与色度模型(拟合非常好)和消色差模型(拟合非常好)的预测非常吻合。跳蛛(Phidippus)与色度和消色差对比度模型的拟合度良好,而蟾蜍捕食者仅与色度模型拟合度良好。不同类型的接收者对色度和消色差模型的识别反应显示出不同的拟合模式,尽管拉比多萨(Rabidosa)再次显示出对两种模型的显著拟合。综上所述,本研究的结果表明,蜘蛛外观的色度和消色差特征都有可能解释有意接收者和无意接收者行为反应的差异。这一结果表明,在求偶过程中,性选择和自然选择可能会针对雄性外观的不同特征。
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes reviews, original contributions and commentaries dealing with quantitative empirical and theoretical studies in the analysis of animal behavior at the level of the individual, group, population, community, and species.