Geomagnetic Disturbances Due To Neutral-Wind-Driven Ionospheric Currents

IF 3.7 2区 地球科学 Space Weather Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI:10.1029/2023sw003750
Cheng Sheng, Yue Deng, Daniel T. Welling, Steven K. Morley
{"title":"Geomagnetic Disturbances Due To Neutral-Wind-Driven Ionospheric Currents","authors":"Cheng Sheng, Yue Deng, Daniel T. Welling, Steven K. Morley","doi":"10.1029/2023sw003750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous simulation efforts on geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs) and geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) mostly rely on global magnetohydrodynamics models, which explicitly calculate the magnetospheric currents and carry certain assumptions about the ionosphere currents. Therefore, the role of ionospheric and thermospheric processes to GMDs has not been fully evaluated. In this study, Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model simulations for an idealized storm event have been conducted. Simply, the high-latitude electrodynamic forcing (potential pattern and particle precipitation) has been specified by empirical models. GMDs due to neutral-wind driven currents have been compared to those caused by magnetospheric convection driven currents during both the main and recovery phases. At locations where the high-latitude electric potential is dominant, neutral-wind driven currents are found to contribute to about 10%–30% of the total GMDs. During the recovery phase when the ion-convection pattern retreats to high latitudes, neutral-wind driven currents become the primary sources for GMDs at middle latitudes on the dayside due to the “flywheel” effect and the large dayside conductance. Our result strongly suggests that ionospheric and thermospheric processes should not be neglected when estimating GMDs and therefore GICs.","PeriodicalId":22181,"journal":{"name":"Space Weather","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space Weather","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023sw003750","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous simulation efforts on geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs) and geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) mostly rely on global magnetohydrodynamics models, which explicitly calculate the magnetospheric currents and carry certain assumptions about the ionosphere currents. Therefore, the role of ionospheric and thermospheric processes to GMDs has not been fully evaluated. In this study, Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model simulations for an idealized storm event have been conducted. Simply, the high-latitude electrodynamic forcing (potential pattern and particle precipitation) has been specified by empirical models. GMDs due to neutral-wind driven currents have been compared to those caused by magnetospheric convection driven currents during both the main and recovery phases. At locations where the high-latitude electric potential is dominant, neutral-wind driven currents are found to contribute to about 10%–30% of the total GMDs. During the recovery phase when the ion-convection pattern retreats to high latitudes, neutral-wind driven currents become the primary sources for GMDs at middle latitudes on the dayside due to the “flywheel” effect and the large dayside conductance. Our result strongly suggests that ionospheric and thermospheric processes should not be neglected when estimating GMDs and therefore GICs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性风驱动电离层电流引起的地磁扰动
以往对地磁扰动和地磁感应电流的模拟工作大多依赖于全球磁流体力学模型,这些模型明确计算磁层电流并对电离层电流做出某些假设。因此,尚未充分评估电离层和热层过程对 GMD 的作用。在本研究中,对理想化风暴事件进行了全球电离层热层模型模拟。简单地说,高纬度电动强迫(电势模式和粒子降水)是由经验模型指定的。在主要阶段和恢复阶段,比较了中性风驱动流和磁层对流驱动流引起的 GMD。在高纬度电势占主导地位的地点,发现中性风驱动的电流约占 GMD 总量的 10%-30%。在恢复阶段,当离子对流模式退回到高纬度时,由于 "飞轮 "效应和巨大的日侧电导,中性风驱动电流成为中纬度日侧全球移动碎片的主要来源。我们的研究结果有力地表明,在估算全球移动碎片和全球气候影响指标时,不应忽视电离层和热层过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
29.70%
发文量
166
期刊最新文献
Quantification of Representation Error in the Neutral Winds and Ion Drifts Using Data Assimilation A Novel Ionospheric Inversion Model: PINN-SAMI3 (Physics Informed Neural Network Based on SAMI3) Nowcasting Solar EUV Irradiance With Photospheric Magnetic Fields and the Mg II Index Calculating the High-Latitude Ionospheric Electrodynamics Using a Machine Learning-Based Field-Aligned Current Model Effects of Forbush Decreases on the Global Electric Circuit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1