Socially constructed beliefs and the uptake of the Child Dental Benefits Schedule

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Australian dental journal Pub Date : 2024-03-24 DOI:10.1111/adj.13015
G Moloney, K Amos, S Edser, C Barone
{"title":"Socially constructed beliefs and the uptake of the Child Dental Benefits Schedule","authors":"G Moloney,&nbsp;K Amos,&nbsp;S Edser,&nbsp;C Barone","doi":"10.1111/adj.13015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The Child Dental Benefits Schedule (CDBS) provides automatic access to subsidized dental care for eligible Australian children, but uptake is low. As cost is not a factor, socially constructed perceptions, which may be subscribed to without personal experience, were explored as potential barriers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two studies with parents (child &lt;18 years) were conducted. In Study one (N=317) participants completed a free-response task eliciting socially constructed perceptions about the dentist. These were factor-analysed in Study two (N=231), and the salience of these perceptions in relation to uptake was measured for the 113 eligible to access the CDBS participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In Study one, similar positive, negative, procedural and time words were elicited across conditions. Study two revealed Negative, Positive and Hassle perception factors associated with the dentist and that 61% of eligible participants had accessed the CDBS. Generalized Structural Equation Modelling with eligible participants revealed Positive and Negative perceptions were negatively correlated, Negative perceptions were positively correlated with Hassle, and, as Hassle increased, the probability of parents accessing the CDBS significantly decreased.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Confusion around eligibility to access CDBS is still an issue. Low CDBS uptake may be associated with perceived hassle associated with the dentist, which may reflect parental negative perceptions. © 2024 Australian Dental Association.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8593,"journal":{"name":"Australian dental journal","volume":"69 3","pages":"197-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adj.13015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.13015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Child Dental Benefits Schedule (CDBS) provides automatic access to subsidized dental care for eligible Australian children, but uptake is low. As cost is not a factor, socially constructed perceptions, which may be subscribed to without personal experience, were explored as potential barriers.

Methods

Two studies with parents (child <18 years) were conducted. In Study one (N=317) participants completed a free-response task eliciting socially constructed perceptions about the dentist. These were factor-analysed in Study two (N=231), and the salience of these perceptions in relation to uptake was measured for the 113 eligible to access the CDBS participants.

Results

In Study one, similar positive, negative, procedural and time words were elicited across conditions. Study two revealed Negative, Positive and Hassle perception factors associated with the dentist and that 61% of eligible participants had accessed the CDBS. Generalized Structural Equation Modelling with eligible participants revealed Positive and Negative perceptions were negatively correlated, Negative perceptions were positively correlated with Hassle, and, as Hassle increased, the probability of parents accessing the CDBS significantly decreased.

Conclusions

Confusion around eligibility to access CDBS is still an issue. Low CDBS uptake may be associated with perceived hassle associated with the dentist, which may reflect parental negative perceptions. © 2024 Australian Dental Association.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会建构的信念与儿童牙科福利表的使用情况。
背景:儿童牙科福利表(CDBS)为符合条件的澳大利亚儿童提供自动获得牙科保健补贴的机会,但使用率很低。由于费用不是一个因素,因此研究人员探讨了社会建构的观念,这些观念可能是在没有亲身经历的情况下认同的,也可能是潜在的障碍:方法:对家长(儿童)进行了两项研究:在第一项研究中,不同条件下的积极、消极、程序和时间词相似。研究二显示了与牙医相关的消极、积极和麻烦感知因素,61%的合格参与者使用过 CDBS。对符合条件的参与者进行的广义结构方程建模显示,积极感知与消极感知呈负相关,消极感知与烦恼呈正相关,随着烦恼的增加,家长使用 CDBS 的概率显著下降:关于 CDBS 使用资格的混淆仍然是一个问题。CDBS 使用率低可能与认为看牙医很麻烦有关,这可能反映了家长的负面看法。© 2024 澳大利亚牙科协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian dental journal
Australian dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Dental Journal provides a forum for the exchange of information about new and significant research in dentistry, promoting the discipline of dentistry in Australia and throughout the world. It comprises peer-reviewed research articles as its core material, supplemented by reviews, theoretical articles, special features and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
ADRF Special Research Supplement December 2024. Supplement introduction. Assessment of teledentistry in improving access to dental care: a systematic review. Obstructive sleep apnoea, sleep bruxism and gastroesophageal reflux - mutually interacting conditions? A literature review. Sleep-disordered breathing - clinical spectrum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1