Detection of Enterococcus cecorum to identify persistently contaminated locations using faecal and environmental samples in broiler houses of clinically healthy flocks.

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Avian Pathology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1080/03079457.2024.2334682
Jesper Tessin, Arne Jung, Amanda Silberborth, Karl Rohn, Jochen Schulz, Christian Visscher, Nicole Kemper
{"title":"Detection of <i>Enterococcus cecorum</i> to identify persistently contaminated locations using faecal and environmental samples in broiler houses of clinically healthy flocks.","authors":"Jesper Tessin, Arne Jung, Amanda Silberborth, Karl Rohn, Jochen Schulz, Christian Visscher, Nicole Kemper","doi":"10.1080/03079457.2024.2334682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Worldwide outbreaks make infections with pathogenic strains of <i>Enterococcus cecorum</i> (EC) one of the most important diseases in the broiler industry. Although research has increased knowledge about the pathogen, the transmission is not fully understood. Samples from different locations were collected from two broiler farms in Germany over a total of six production cycles. Samples were collected at days 1, 5, 10, 15, 21, 27, 34, 41 post-hatch and after cleaning and disinfection (C&D). A total of 1017 samples were collected from 25 different locations on the farms. Samples were analysed in the laboratory for EC by quantitative real-time PCR. Overall, 7.5% of the samples were positive. The probabilities for positive and negative samples did not differ between the farms. The number of findings differed significantly between the cycles. Compared to other samples, the chances of detecting EC in faecal samples were significantly higher. Most positive samples were found in the last week of the production periods, indicating an accumulation of EC in the barn environment. After C&D, positive PCR results were obtained in four out of 14 locations. A re-introduction from contaminated environment seemed possible. However, one pooled faecal sample was positive 1 day post-hatch. The locations that showed positive results after C&D and the positive faecal sample 1 day post-hatch indicated the persistence of EC in broiler houses of clinically healthy flocks that could lead to potential horizontal transmission routes. The present study detected potential EC sources and may help to improve hygienic measures to avoid transmissions.<b>RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS</b>Methodology is suitable to detect EC during production and after C&D.Locations were detected that may serve as a reservoir for EC.Cycles with fewer positive samples were observed.Cleaning and disinfection had a major impact on the detection of EC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8788,"journal":{"name":"Avian Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2024.2334682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Worldwide outbreaks make infections with pathogenic strains of Enterococcus cecorum (EC) one of the most important diseases in the broiler industry. Although research has increased knowledge about the pathogen, the transmission is not fully understood. Samples from different locations were collected from two broiler farms in Germany over a total of six production cycles. Samples were collected at days 1, 5, 10, 15, 21, 27, 34, 41 post-hatch and after cleaning and disinfection (C&D). A total of 1017 samples were collected from 25 different locations on the farms. Samples were analysed in the laboratory for EC by quantitative real-time PCR. Overall, 7.5% of the samples were positive. The probabilities for positive and negative samples did not differ between the farms. The number of findings differed significantly between the cycles. Compared to other samples, the chances of detecting EC in faecal samples were significantly higher. Most positive samples were found in the last week of the production periods, indicating an accumulation of EC in the barn environment. After C&D, positive PCR results were obtained in four out of 14 locations. A re-introduction from contaminated environment seemed possible. However, one pooled faecal sample was positive 1 day post-hatch. The locations that showed positive results after C&D and the positive faecal sample 1 day post-hatch indicated the persistence of EC in broiler houses of clinically healthy flocks that could lead to potential horizontal transmission routes. The present study detected potential EC sources and may help to improve hygienic measures to avoid transmissions.RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTSMethodology is suitable to detect EC during production and after C&D.Locations were detected that may serve as a reservoir for EC.Cycles with fewer positive samples were observed.Cleaning and disinfection had a major impact on the detection of EC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用临床健康鸡群肉鸡舍中的粪便和环境样本检测盲肠球菌,以确定持续受污染的地点。
全球范围内爆发的致病性盲肠球菌(EC)感染已成为肉鸡行业最重要的疾病之一。尽管研究工作增加了对该病原体的了解,但对其传播途径还不完全清楚。我们从德国两个肉鸡养殖场的不同地点收集了共六个生产周期的样本。在孵化后第 1、5、10、15、21、27、34 和 41 天以及清洁和消毒 (C&D) 后采集样本。从养殖场的 25 个不同地点共采集了 1017 个样本。实验室通过实时定量 PCR 对样本进行了氨基甲酸乙酯分析。总体而言,7.5%的样本呈阳性。阳性和阴性样本的概率在不同农场之间没有差异。不同周期的检测结果数量差异很大。与其他样本相比,粪便样本检出氨基甲酸乙酯的几率明显较高。大多数阳性样本在生产期的最后一周发现,这表明氨基甲酸乙酯在牛舍环境中积累。经拆解后,14 个样本中有 4 个样本的 PCR 检测结果呈阳性。看来有可能是从受污染的环境中再次吸入的。不过,有一个粪便样本在孵化后一天呈阳性。拆解后结果呈阳性的地点和孵化后一天呈阳性的粪便样本表明,临床健康鸡群的肉鸡舍中仍存在氨基甲酸乙酯,可能导致潜在的水平传播途径。研究重点:该方法适用于检测生产过程中和拆解后的禽流感,检测到的地点可能是禽流感的贮存地,观察到阳性样本较少的循环,清洁和消毒对检测到禽流感有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Avian Pathology
Avian Pathology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Avian Pathology is the official journal of the World Veterinary Poultry Association and, since its first publication in 1972, has been a leading international journal for poultry disease scientists. It publishes material relevant to the entire field of infectious and non-infectious diseases of poultry and other birds. Accepted manuscripts will contribute novel data of interest to an international readership and will add significantly to knowledge and understanding of diseases, old or new. Subject areas include pathology, diagnosis, detection and characterisation of pathogens, infections of possible zoonotic importance, epidemiology, innate and immune responses, vaccines, gene sequences, genetics in relation to disease and physiological and biochemical changes in response to disease. First and subsequent reports of well-recognized diseases within a country are not acceptable unless they also include substantial new information about the disease or pathogen. Manuscripts on wild or pet birds should describe disease or pathogens in a significant number of birds, recognizing/suggesting serious potential impact on that species or that the disease or pathogen is of demonstrable relevance to poultry. Manuscripts on food-borne microorganisms acquired during or after processing, and those that catalogue the occurrence or properties of microorganisms, are unlikely to be considered for publication in the absence of data linking them to avian disease.
期刊最新文献
Interference between Escherichia coli genotypes from the E. coli peritonitis syndrome given simultaneously to productive SPF White Leghorn hens by intratracheal inoculation. The financial cost of coccidiosis in Algerian chicken production: a major challenge for the poultry sector. Identification of B-cell epitopes located on the surface in the PB2 protein of the H9N2 subtype avian influenza virus. Genomic characterization of infectious bursal disease virus in Argentina provides evidence of the recent transcontinental spread of Chinese genotype A2dB1b. Emergence of the novel infectious bursal disease virus variant in vaccinated poultry flocks in Egypt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1