Jake N Robertson, Henry Diep, Alexander R Pinto, Christopher G Sobey, Grant R Drummond, Antony Vinh, Maria Jelinic
{"title":"Optimization of mouse kidney digestion protocols for single-cell applications.","authors":"Jake N Robertson, Henry Diep, Alexander R Pinto, Christopher G Sobey, Grant R Drummond, Antony Vinh, Maria Jelinic","doi":"10.1152/physiolgenomics.00002.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single-cell technologies such as flow cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing have allowed for comprehensive characterization of the kidney cellulome. However, there is a disparity in the various protocols for preparing kidney single-cell suspensions. We aimed to address this limitation by characterizing kidney cellular heterogeneity using three previously published single-cell preparation protocols. Single-cell suspensions were prepared from male and female C57BL/6 kidneys using the following kidney tissue dissociation protocols: a scRNAseq protocol (<i>P1</i>), a multi-tissue digestion kit from Miltenyi Biotec (<i>P2</i>), and a protocol established in our laboratory (<i>P3</i>). Following dissociation, flow cytometry was used to identify known major cell types including leukocytes (myeloid and lymphoid), vascular cells (smooth muscle and endothelial), nephron epithelial cells (intercalating, principal, proximal, and distal tubule cells), podocytes, and fibroblasts. Of the protocols tested, <i>P2</i> yielded significantly less leukocytes and type B intercalating cells compared with the other techniques. <i>P1</i> and <i>P3</i> produced similar yields for most cell types; however, endothelial and myeloid-derived cells were significantly enriched using <i>P1</i>. Significant sex differences were detected in only two cell types: granulocytes (increased in males) and smooth muscle cells (increased in females). Future single-cell studies that aim to enrich specific kidney cell types may benefit from this comparative analysis.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study is the first to evaluate published single-cell suspension preparation protocols and their ability to produce high-quality cellular yields from the mouse kidney. Three single-cell digestion protocols were compared and each produced significant differences in kidney cellular heterogeneity. These findings highlight the importance of the digestion protocol when using single-cell technologies. This study may help future single-cell science research by guiding researchers to choose protocols that enrich certain cell types of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":20129,"journal":{"name":"Physiological genomics","volume":" ","pages":"469-482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00002.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Single-cell technologies such as flow cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing have allowed for comprehensive characterization of the kidney cellulome. However, there is a disparity in the various protocols for preparing kidney single-cell suspensions. We aimed to address this limitation by characterizing kidney cellular heterogeneity using three previously published single-cell preparation protocols. Single-cell suspensions were prepared from male and female C57BL/6 kidneys using the following kidney tissue dissociation protocols: a scRNAseq protocol (P1), a multi-tissue digestion kit from Miltenyi Biotec (P2), and a protocol established in our laboratory (P3). Following dissociation, flow cytometry was used to identify known major cell types including leukocytes (myeloid and lymphoid), vascular cells (smooth muscle and endothelial), nephron epithelial cells (intercalating, principal, proximal, and distal tubule cells), podocytes, and fibroblasts. Of the protocols tested, P2 yielded significantly less leukocytes and type B intercalating cells compared with the other techniques. P1 and P3 produced similar yields for most cell types; however, endothelial and myeloid-derived cells were significantly enriched using P1. Significant sex differences were detected in only two cell types: granulocytes (increased in males) and smooth muscle cells (increased in females). Future single-cell studies that aim to enrich specific kidney cell types may benefit from this comparative analysis.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to evaluate published single-cell suspension preparation protocols and their ability to produce high-quality cellular yields from the mouse kidney. Three single-cell digestion protocols were compared and each produced significant differences in kidney cellular heterogeneity. These findings highlight the importance of the digestion protocol when using single-cell technologies. This study may help future single-cell science research by guiding researchers to choose protocols that enrich certain cell types of interest.
期刊介绍:
The Physiological Genomics publishes original papers, reviews and rapid reports in a wide area of research focused on uncovering the links between genes and physiology at all levels of biological organization. Articles on topics ranging from single genes to the whole genome and their links to the physiology of humans, any model organism, organ, tissue or cell are welcome. Areas of interest include complex polygenic traits preferably of importance to human health and gene-function relationships of disease processes. Specifically, the Journal has dedicated Sections focused on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to function, cardiovascular, renal, metabolic and neurological systems, exercise physiology, pharmacogenomics, clinical, translational and genomics for precision medicine, comparative and statistical genomics and databases. For further details on research themes covered within these Sections, please refer to the descriptions given under each Section.