What can nurses learn from patient's needs and wishes when developing an evidence-based quality improvement learning culture? A qualitative study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1111/scs.13252
Jeltje Giesen, Ilse Timmerman, Annick Bakker-Jacobs, Marjolein Berings, Getty Huisman-de Waal, Anneke Van Vught, Hester Vermeulen
{"title":"What can nurses learn from patient's needs and wishes when developing an evidence-based quality improvement learning culture? A qualitative study.","authors":"Jeltje Giesen, Ilse Timmerman, Annick Bakker-Jacobs, Marjolein Berings, Getty Huisman-de Waal, Anneke Van Vught, Hester Vermeulen","doi":"10.1111/scs.13252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient participation is fundamental in nursing care and has yielded benefits for patient outcomes. However, despite their compassionate care approach, nurses do not always incorporate patients' needs and wish into evidence-based practice, quality improvement or learning activities. Therefore, a shift to continuous quality improvement based on evidence-based practice is necessary to enhance the quality of care. The patient's opinion is an essential part of this process. To establish a more sustainable learning culture for evidence-based quality improvement, it is crucial that nurses learn alongside their patients. However, to promote this, nurses require a deeper understanding of patients' care preferences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore patients' needs and wishes towards being involved in care processes that nurses can use in developing an evidence-based quality improvement learning culture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted in two hospital departments and one community care team. In total, 18 patients were purposefully selected for individual semi-structured interviews with an average of 15 min. A framework analysis based on the fundamental of care framework was utilised to analyse the data deductively. In addition, inductive codes were added to patients' experiences beyond the framework. For reporting this study, the SRQR guideline was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants needed a compassionate nurse who established and sustained a trusting relationship. They wanted nurses to be present and actively involved during the care delivery. Shared decision-making improved when nurses offered fair, clear and tailored information. Mistrust or a disrupted nurse-patient relationship was found to be time-consuming and challenging to restore.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results confirmed the importance of a durable nurse-patient relationship and showed the consequences of nurses' communication on shared decision-making. Insights into patients' care preferences are essential to stimulate the development of an evidence-based quality improvement learning culture within nursing teams and for successful implementation processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"680-691"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient participation is fundamental in nursing care and has yielded benefits for patient outcomes. However, despite their compassionate care approach, nurses do not always incorporate patients' needs and wish into evidence-based practice, quality improvement or learning activities. Therefore, a shift to continuous quality improvement based on evidence-based practice is necessary to enhance the quality of care. The patient's opinion is an essential part of this process. To establish a more sustainable learning culture for evidence-based quality improvement, it is crucial that nurses learn alongside their patients. However, to promote this, nurses require a deeper understanding of patients' care preferences.

Objective: To explore patients' needs and wishes towards being involved in care processes that nurses can use in developing an evidence-based quality improvement learning culture.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in two hospital departments and one community care team. In total, 18 patients were purposefully selected for individual semi-structured interviews with an average of 15 min. A framework analysis based on the fundamental of care framework was utilised to analyse the data deductively. In addition, inductive codes were added to patients' experiences beyond the framework. For reporting this study, the SRQR guideline was used.

Results: Participants needed a compassionate nurse who established and sustained a trusting relationship. They wanted nurses to be present and actively involved during the care delivery. Shared decision-making improved when nurses offered fair, clear and tailored information. Mistrust or a disrupted nurse-patient relationship was found to be time-consuming and challenging to restore.

Conclusions: Results confirmed the importance of a durable nurse-patient relationship and showed the consequences of nurses' communication on shared decision-making. Insights into patients' care preferences are essential to stimulate the development of an evidence-based quality improvement learning culture within nursing teams and for successful implementation processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在发展以证据为基础的质量改进学习文化时,护士能从病人的需求和愿望中学到什么?一项定性研究。
背景:患者参与是护理工作的基础,对患者的治疗效果大有裨益。然而,尽管护士采取了富有同情心的护理方法,但她们并不总是将病人的需求和愿望纳入循证实践、质量改进或学习活动中。因此,为了提高护理质量,有必要转向以循证实践为基础的持续质量改进。在这一过程中,病人的意见是不可或缺的一部分。为了建立一种更可持续的循证质量改进学习文化,护士与病人一起学习至关重要。然而,要促进这一点,护士需要更深入地了解患者的护理偏好:探索患者对参与护理过程的需求和愿望,以便护士在发展循证质量改进学习文化时加以利用:在两个医院科室和一个社区护理团队中开展了一项定性研究。共有 18 名患者被有目的地选中进行半结构式访谈,平均访谈时间为 15 分钟。研究采用基于护理基本框架的框架分析法对数据进行演绎分析。此外,还对框架之外的患者经历添加了归纳代码。本研究报告采用了 SRQR 指南:参与者需要一名富有同情心的护士,能够建立并维持相互信任的关系。他们希望护士在护理过程中在场并积极参与。当护士提供公平、清晰和有针对性的信息时,共同决策会得到改善。研究发现,不信任或中断的护患关系需要耗费大量时间才能恢复:结论:研究结果证实了持久的护患关系的重要性,并显示了护士沟通对共同决策的影响。洞察患者的护理偏好对于促进护理团队内部循证质量改进学习文化的发展和成功实施过程至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Exploring young adults' experiences with food allergy during their teenage years: A practice research study. Factors influencing job satisfaction and professional competencies in clinical practice among internationally educated nurses during the migration journey: A mixed-methods systematic review. Navigating parenthood in the face of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A qualitative exploration of partner experiences. Meaning-oriented thematic analysis grounded in reflective lifeworld research-A holistic approach for caring science research. Catalysts for change: A qualitative study of middle managers' perception of nursing professional competence in primary healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1