Laparoscopic Sac Disconnection and Peritoneal Closure of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1089/lap.2023.0425
Fouad Youssef, Anwar Abdul-Hadi Martinez, Gilgamesh Eamer, Ahmed Nasr, Marcos Bettolli
{"title":"Laparoscopic Sac Disconnection and Peritoneal Closure of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia.","authors":"Fouad Youssef, Anwar Abdul-Hadi Martinez, Gilgamesh Eamer, Ahmed Nasr, Marcos Bettolli","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Laparoscopic sac disconnection and peritoneal closure represents an alternative to open pediatric hernia repair. We performed a retrospective review of our data to evaluate this alternative method. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> With REB approval, a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic indirect inguinal hernia repair between June 2013 and July 2016 was conducted. Primary outcome was the recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes included length of surgery, postoperative hydrocele, and perioperative complications. Data were extracted from EPIC Hyperspace onto a standardized data extraction form. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 243 patients were included, of which 82% were males. Age ranged from 1 month to 17 years of age. A total of 322 defects were repaired. Eighty (32%) had contralateral patent processus vaginalis. Twelve (4%) patients presented with incarceration and three (1.2%) had a direct inguinal hernia defect. Recurrence rate was 0.6% (<i>n</i> = 2). There were no intraoperative complications. Operative time was an average of 40 and 54 minutes for unilateral and bilateral repairs, respectively. No testicular ascents, testicular atrophy, vas deferens injury, postoperative hydroceles, and wound infections were reported. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Laparoscopic sac disconnection and peritoneal closure of pediatric inguinal hernia is a safe, feasible method with one of the lowest reported recurrence rate among the other laparoscopic methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"747-751"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic sac disconnection and peritoneal closure represents an alternative to open pediatric hernia repair. We performed a retrospective review of our data to evaluate this alternative method. Materials and Methods: With REB approval, a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic indirect inguinal hernia repair between June 2013 and July 2016 was conducted. Primary outcome was the recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes included length of surgery, postoperative hydrocele, and perioperative complications. Data were extracted from EPIC Hyperspace onto a standardized data extraction form. Results: A total of 243 patients were included, of which 82% were males. Age ranged from 1 month to 17 years of age. A total of 322 defects were repaired. Eighty (32%) had contralateral patent processus vaginalis. Twelve (4%) patients presented with incarceration and three (1.2%) had a direct inguinal hernia defect. Recurrence rate was 0.6% (n = 2). There were no intraoperative complications. Operative time was an average of 40 and 54 minutes for unilateral and bilateral repairs, respectively. No testicular ascents, testicular atrophy, vas deferens injury, postoperative hydroceles, and wound infections were reported. Conclusion: Laparoscopic sac disconnection and peritoneal closure of pediatric inguinal hernia is a safe, feasible method with one of the lowest reported recurrence rate among the other laparoscopic methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿腹股沟疝气的腹腔镜囊腔断开和腹膜闭合术。
背景:腹腔镜疝囊断开和腹膜闭合术是开腹小儿疝气修补术的一种替代方法。我们对数据进行了回顾性审查,以评估这种替代方法。材料与方法:经 REB 批准,我们对 2013 年 6 月至 2016 年 7 月间接受腹腔镜间接腹股沟疝修补术的所有患者进行了回顾性病历审查。主要结果是复发率。次要结果包括手术时间、术后鞘膜积液和围手术期并发症。数据从 EPIC Hyperspace 中提取,并填入标准化数据提取表中。结果:共纳入 243 名患者,其中 82% 为男性。年龄从1个月到17岁不等。共修复了 322 处缺损。80例(32%)患者对侧阴道前突通畅。12名患者(4%)出现嵌顿,3名患者(1.2%)出现直接腹股沟疝缺损。复发率为0.6%(n = 2)。术中无并发症。单侧和双侧修复手术的平均手术时间分别为40分钟和54分钟。无睾丸上升、睾丸萎缩、输精管损伤、术后水肿和伤口感染的报告。结论腹腔镜小儿腹股沟疝气囊断开和腹膜闭合术是一种安全可行的方法,在其他腹腔镜方法中复发率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
Application of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic Liver Resection with Pringle Maneuver: A Comparative Study with the Pringle Maneuver. Short-Term Efficacy of LCBDE+LC Versus ERCP/EST+LC in the Treatment of Cholelithiasis Combined with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Evaluation of Surgical Results and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Approaches in Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Analysis. Is Endoscopic Resection Essential for Patients with Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor? Is It Necessary to Endoscopically Evaluate the Anastomosis in Robotic or Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures for Colorectal Cancer?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1