Letter re: Misidentification of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization by Current Procedural Terminology.

Vascular and endovascular surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1177/15385744241241856
Renxi Li, Adham Qurashi, Anton Sidawy, Bao-Ngoc Nguyen
{"title":"Letter re: Misidentification of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization by Current Procedural Terminology.","authors":"Renxi Li, Adham Qurashi, Anton Sidawy, Bao-Ngoc Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/15385744241241856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this letter, we discussed the selection of patients undergoing Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) using the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. We examined a previous study using CPT code 37215 to identify TCAR cases using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. As an ACS-NSQIP participating site, we have complete access to the ACS-NSQIP database, and we performed a more in-depth examination of the method. We found significant discrepancies in the method described and conclude that it is methodologically flawed to use CPT code 37215 to differentiate TCAR cases. This study not only re-evaluates the validity of the previous study but also has the potential to prevent other researchers from employing the erroneous methodology for TCAR selection using the CPT code, which is one of the most widely used standardizations of medical communication for surgical procedures. This is particularly pertinent given the recent \"TCAR revolution\", where significant attention has been focused on TCAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241241856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this letter, we discussed the selection of patients undergoing Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) using the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. We examined a previous study using CPT code 37215 to identify TCAR cases using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. As an ACS-NSQIP participating site, we have complete access to the ACS-NSQIP database, and we performed a more in-depth examination of the method. We found significant discrepancies in the method described and conclude that it is methodologically flawed to use CPT code 37215 to differentiate TCAR cases. This study not only re-evaluates the validity of the previous study but also has the potential to prevent other researchers from employing the erroneous methodology for TCAR selection using the CPT code, which is one of the most widely used standardizations of medical communication for surgical procedures. This is particularly pertinent given the recent "TCAR revolution", where significant attention has been focused on TCAR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于:当前程序术语对经颈动脉血运重建的错误识别的信函。
在这封信中,我们讨论了使用现行手术术语(CPT)代码选择经颈动脉血运重建术(TCAR)患者的问题。我们研究了之前的一项研究,该研究使用 CPT 代码 37215,利用美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库识别 TCAR 病例。作为 ACS-NSQIP 的参与机构,我们可以完全访问 ACS-NSQIP 数据库,因此我们对该方法进行了更深入的研究。我们发现所述方法存在重大差异,并得出结论:使用 CPT 编码 37215 来区分 TCAR 病例在方法论上存在缺陷。这项研究不仅重新评估了之前研究的有效性,而且有可能防止其他研究人员使用错误的 CPT 代码方法来选择 TCAR,因为 CPT 代码是外科手术医疗沟通中使用最广泛的标准化代码之一。考虑到最近的 "TCAR 革命",这一点尤为重要,因为 TCAR 已成为人们关注的焦点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Popliteal Vein Entrapment as a Rare Form of Popliteal Entrapment Syndrome. Challenging Conventional Treatment: Retrograde Implantation of a Covered Stent in Superior Mensenteric Artery Occlusion Case. Smaller Hospital Size is Associated With Higher Mortality in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection. Acute Vascular Complications of VA-ECMO in COVID-19 Patients. Does COVID-19 Affect the Outcome? Gender-Specific Long-Term Results After Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Depending on the Site of Distal Anastomosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1