Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-29DOI: 10.1177/15385744241279139
Joshua R Chen, Vishal N Shah, Christopher Pritting, Michael Nooromid, Babak Abai, Konstadinos Plestis
Loeys Dietz Syndrome (LDS) is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder resulting from a mutation in the transforming growth factor beta receptor (TGFBR) family of genes. It is commonly associated with the development of aortic aneurysms and dissections. We report the successful open surgical management of thoracoabdominal aneurysms in a father and daughter with Loeys-Dietz Syndrome after failed endovascular repair. The daughter required stent graft explantation, while the stent graft remained in the father. These cases highlight the importance of early genetic testing of both patients and first-degree family members in those with a strong history of aortic disease, even when there is a lack of typical connective tissue disorder associated physical exam findings and open surgical index operations.
{"title":"Like Father like Daughter: Surgical Redo Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repairs in a Family With Loeys-Dietz Syndrome.","authors":"Joshua R Chen, Vishal N Shah, Christopher Pritting, Michael Nooromid, Babak Abai, Konstadinos Plestis","doi":"10.1177/15385744241279139","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241279139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loeys Dietz Syndrome (LDS) is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder resulting from a mutation in the transforming growth factor beta receptor (TGFBR) family of genes. It is commonly associated with the development of aortic aneurysms and dissections. We report the successful open surgical management of thoracoabdominal aneurysms in a father and daughter with Loeys-Dietz Syndrome after failed endovascular repair. The daughter required stent graft explantation, while the stent graft remained in the father. These cases highlight the importance of early genetic testing of both patients and first-degree family members in those with a strong history of aortic disease, even when there is a lack of typical connective tissue disorder associated physical exam findings and open surgical index operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142116652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-03DOI: 10.1177/15385744241279653
Pablo M Boada-Sandoval, Héctor Bizueto-Rosas, Luis E Martínez-Bravo
Cardiac myxomas are the most common primary benign tumors of the heart. The occlusion of peripheral arteries and complete obstruction of the abdominal aorta by a tumor embolus presents with distinct clinical manifestations. Herein, we present the case of a 38-year-old male with acute paresthesia, muscle weakness, erythematous, and violaceous changes in skin color localized to the dorsum of the left forefoot initially treated as cutaneous vasculitis. Further studies revealed the total occlusion of the terminal abdominal aorta by a saddle embolus from a cardiac myxoma. A multidisciplinary team consisting of cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons were involved in treating the patient, which resulted in full resolution of the case. This paper details the progression of acute bilateral limb ischemia to chronic limb threatening ischemia resulting from the total occlusion of the terminal abdominal aorta by a saddle embolus.
{"title":"Progressive Acute Lower Extremity Ischemia Resulting From Cardiac Myxoma Embolization: A Case Report.","authors":"Pablo M Boada-Sandoval, Héctor Bizueto-Rosas, Luis E Martínez-Bravo","doi":"10.1177/15385744241279653","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241279653","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac myxomas are the most common primary benign tumors of the heart. The occlusion of peripheral arteries and complete obstruction of the abdominal aorta by a tumor embolus presents with distinct clinical manifestations. Herein, we present the case of a 38-year-old male with acute paresthesia, muscle weakness, erythematous, and violaceous changes in skin color localized to the dorsum of the left forefoot initially treated as cutaneous vasculitis. Further studies revealed the total occlusion of the terminal abdominal aorta by a saddle embolus from a cardiac myxoma. A multidisciplinary team consisting of cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons were involved in treating the patient, which resulted in full resolution of the case. This paper details the progression of acute bilateral limb ischemia to chronic limb threatening ischemia resulting from the total occlusion of the terminal abdominal aorta by a saddle embolus.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1177/15385744241278839
Renxi Li, Qianyun Luo, Derrick Green, Stephen Huddleston
Background: Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) is associated with high in-hospital mortality and the need for immediate surgical intervention. Larger hospital size may be associated with better patient care and surgical outcomes. This study aimed to examine the effect of hospital size on TAAD outcomes.
Method: Patients who underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from Q4 2015-2020. NIS stratifies hospital size into small, medium, and large based on the number of hospital beds, geographical location, and the teaching status of the hospitals. Patients admitted to small/medium and large hospitals were stratified into two cohorts. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to compare in-hospital outcomes, adjusted for demographics, comorbidity, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics including procedural volume.
Results: There were 1106 and 3752 TAAD admitted to small/medium and large hospitals, respectively. Among patients admitted to small/medium hospitals, there was higher mortality (17.27% vs 14.37%, aOR = 1.32, P < 0.01), but shorter length of stay (P < 0.01) and lower cost (P = 0.03) compared to larger hospitals. There was no difference in morbidities.
Conclusions: Marked higher mortality is associated with admission to smaller hospitals among patients with TAAD, which may in turn decrease the average hospital stay and cost. Given that a significant percentage of patients are already being transferred out of the initial hospital and small/medium hospital is associated with higher mortality, centralization of care in centers of excellence may decrease the high mortality associated with TAAD.
{"title":"Smaller Hospital Size is Associated With Higher Mortality in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Renxi Li, Qianyun Luo, Derrick Green, Stephen Huddleston","doi":"10.1177/15385744241278839","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241278839","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) is associated with high in-hospital mortality and the need for immediate surgical intervention. Larger hospital size may be associated with better patient care and surgical outcomes. This study aimed to examine the effect of hospital size on TAAD outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients who underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from Q4 2015-2020. NIS stratifies hospital size into small, medium, and large based on the number of hospital beds, geographical location, and the teaching status of the hospitals. Patients admitted to small/medium and large hospitals were stratified into two cohorts. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to compare in-hospital outcomes, adjusted for demographics, comorbidity, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics including procedural volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1106 and 3752 TAAD admitted to small/medium and large hospitals, respectively. Among patients admitted to small/medium hospitals, there was higher mortality (17.27% vs 14.37%, aOR = 1.32, <i>P</i> < 0.01), but shorter length of stay (<i>P</i> < 0.01) and lower cost (<i>P</i> = 0.03) compared to larger hospitals. There was no difference in morbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Marked higher mortality is associated with admission to smaller hospitals among patients with TAAD, which may in turn decrease the average hospital stay and cost. Given that a significant percentage of patients are already being transferred out of the initial hospital and small/medium hospital is associated with higher mortality, centralization of care in centers of excellence may decrease the high mortality associated with TAAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142057761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-28DOI: 10.1177/15385744241276702
Sonny Gennaro Annunziata, Jasmin Epple, Thomas Schmitz-Rixen, Dittmar Böckler, Reinhart T Grundmann
Objective: Analysis of gender-specific differences in short- and long-term outcome after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAR) regarding the distal anastomosis.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data from 4853 patients of a German health insurance company undergoing OAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) between 2010 and 2016 were analysed. The patients were followed through 2018.
Results: A total of 4050 (83.5%) men and 803 (16.6%) women underwent OAR. Women were older than men (72.9 ± 8.7 vs 69.8 ± 8.5 years; P < .001). A tube graft was used in 2644 (54.5%) patients, an aorto-biiliac bifurcated graft in 1657 (34.1%) and an aorto-bifemoral bifurcated graft in 552 (11.4%). Perioperative mortality was not significantly different between men (5.7%) and women (6.5%) in the total patient population (P = .411). This was true for aorto-aortic tube grafting (P = .361), aorto-biiliac reconstructions (P = 1.000) and aorto-bifemoral reconstructions (P = .345). Kaplan-Meier estimated long-term survival of men after 9 years was better than that of women (55.0% vs 43.8%; P = .006). However, separated by the site of the distal anastomosis, this was only true for aorto-aortic reconstructions (survival men vs women 56.0% vs 42.1%; P = .005), not for aorto-biiliac and aorto-bifemoral reconstructions. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, age over 80 years, heart failure, aorto-bifemoral reconstruction, chronic kidney disease stage 3-5, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral artery disease, arterial hypertension, but not gender (P = .531), had a negative impact on long-term survival.
Conclusion: If possible, an aorto-aortic tube graft should be preferred to aorto-biiliac and aorto-bifemoral reconstructions in OAR. Patients selected for aorto-bifemoral artery reconstruction exhibit higher perioperative morbidity and mortality as well as worse long-term survival compared to patients selected for an intra-abdominal reconstruction. In the multivariate regression analysis, gender was not an independent risk factor for either short- or long-term outcomes.
{"title":"Gender-Specific Long-Term Results After Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Depending on the Site of Distal Anastomosis.","authors":"Sonny Gennaro Annunziata, Jasmin Epple, Thomas Schmitz-Rixen, Dittmar Böckler, Reinhart T Grundmann","doi":"10.1177/15385744241276702","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241276702","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analysis of gender-specific differences in short- and long-term outcome after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAR) regarding the distal anastomosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, data from 4853 patients of a German health insurance company undergoing OAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) between 2010 and 2016 were analysed. The patients were followed through 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4050 (83.5%) men and 803 (16.6%) women underwent OAR. Women were older than men (72.9 ± 8.7 vs 69.8 ± 8.5 years; <i>P</i> < .001). A tube graft was used in 2644 (54.5%) patients, an aorto-biiliac bifurcated graft in 1657 (34.1%) and an aorto-bifemoral bifurcated graft in 552 (11.4%). Perioperative mortality was not significantly different between men (5.7%) and women (6.5%) in the total patient population (<i>P</i> = .411). This was true for aorto-aortic tube grafting (<i>P</i> = .361), aorto-biiliac reconstructions (<i>P</i> = 1.000) and aorto-bifemoral reconstructions (<i>P</i> = .345). Kaplan-Meier estimated long-term survival of men after 9 years was better than that of women (55.0% vs 43.8%; <i>P</i> = .006). However, separated by the site of the distal anastomosis, this was only true for aorto-aortic reconstructions (survival men vs women 56.0% vs 42.1%; <i>P</i> = .005), not for aorto-biiliac and aorto-bifemoral reconstructions. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, age over 80 years, heart failure, aorto-bifemoral reconstruction, chronic kidney disease stage 3-5, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral artery disease, arterial hypertension, but not gender (<i>P</i> = .531), had a negative impact on long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>If possible, an aorto-aortic tube graft should be preferred to aorto-biiliac and aorto-bifemoral reconstructions in OAR. Patients selected for aorto-bifemoral artery reconstruction exhibit higher perioperative morbidity and mortality as well as worse long-term survival compared to patients selected for an intra-abdominal reconstruction. In the multivariate regression analysis, gender was not an independent risk factor for either short- or long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528981/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142086456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1177/15385744241276689
Georges Jreij, Eleanor Dunlap, Suzanna Fitzpatrick, Khanjan Nagarsheth
Popliteal entrapment syndrome (PES) describes a cluster of symptoms related to the compression of the neurovascular bundle in the popliteal fossa, most commonly involving the popliteal artery. In approximately 10-15% of the cases of popliteal entrapment syndrome, the popliteal vein is compressed. Symptoms of popliteal vein entrapment can mimic venous insufficiency or deep venous thrombosis, causing the diagnosis to be missed or delayed. Diagnosis of popliteal vein entrapment can be done with duplex imaging with flexion and extension maneuvers; however, venography is the gold standard for diagnosis. While popliteal vein entrapment is commonly associated with younger individuals, it may also be an underdiagnosed condition in older patients. We describe two cases of successful diagnosis and treatment of late-onset presentation of popliteal vein entrapment.
{"title":"Popliteal Vein Entrapment as a Rare Form of Popliteal Entrapment Syndrome.","authors":"Georges Jreij, Eleanor Dunlap, Suzanna Fitzpatrick, Khanjan Nagarsheth","doi":"10.1177/15385744241276689","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241276689","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Popliteal entrapment syndrome (PES) describes a cluster of symptoms related to the compression of the neurovascular bundle in the popliteal fossa, most commonly involving the popliteal artery. In approximately 10-15% of the cases of popliteal entrapment syndrome, the popliteal vein is compressed. Symptoms of popliteal vein entrapment can mimic venous insufficiency or deep venous thrombosis, causing the diagnosis to be missed or delayed. Diagnosis of popliteal vein entrapment can be done with duplex imaging with flexion and extension maneuvers; however, venography is the gold standard for diagnosis. While popliteal vein entrapment is commonly associated with younger individuals, it may also be an underdiagnosed condition in older patients. We describe two cases of successful diagnosis and treatment of late-onset presentation of popliteal vein entrapment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142044282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1177/15385744241278042
Zhang Jie, Zeyi Zhao
Background: This case report describes a novel endovascular technique for treating superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion, a condition leading to chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). Traditional treatment methods for CMI, primarily due to SMA stenosis, are often complex and risky, particularly for patients unsuitable for conventional surgery. Objective: This study details the application of retrograde recanalization followed by the deployment of a VIABAHN covered stent in a patient with complete SMA ostium occlusion. Methods: The procedure's success in re-establishing mesenteric blood flow demonstrates its potential as a less invasive, safer alternative to traditional surgical approaches. This technique's innovation lies in its retrograde approach, allowing for effective treatment in cases where antegrade access is unfeasible. Results: The patient showed significant symptom improvement without procedural complications, underscoring the method's efficacy and safety. Conclusion: These findings suggest that retrograde stent implantation can be a viable option for managing SMA occlusions, especially in high-risk surgical cases. The successful application of this technique in this case contributes to the evolving landscape of endovascular interventions in vascular surgery and offers a promising direction for future research and clinical practice in treating SMA-related conditions.
背景:本病例报告描述了一种治疗肠系膜上动脉(SMA)闭塞(一种导致慢性肠系膜缺血(CMI)的疾病)的新型血管内技术。肠系膜缺血主要是由 SMA 狭窄引起的,传统的治疗方法往往复杂且风险高,尤其是对于不适合常规手术的患者。研究目的本研究详细介绍了在一名 SMA 管腔完全闭塞的患者身上应用逆行再通路术,然后部署 VIABAHN 覆盖支架的情况。方法:该手术在重建肠系膜血流方面的成功证明了其作为传统手术方法的一种创伤更小、更安全的替代方法的潜力。该技术的创新之处在于其逆行方法,可在无法进行逆行手术的情况下进行有效治疗。结果患者症状明显改善,且无手术并发症,突出了该方法的有效性和安全性。结论这些研究结果表明,逆行支架植入术是治疗 SMA 闭塞的一种可行方法,尤其适用于高风险手术病例。该病例中这一技术的成功应用促进了血管外科血管内介入技术的发展,并为治疗 SMA 相关疾病的未来研究和临床实践提供了一个前景广阔的方向。
{"title":"Challenging Conventional Treatment: Retrograde Implantation of a Covered Stent in Superior Mensenteric Artery Occlusion Case.","authors":"Zhang Jie, Zeyi Zhao","doi":"10.1177/15385744241278042","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241278042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This case report describes a novel endovascular technique for treating superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion, a condition leading to chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). Traditional treatment methods for CMI, primarily due to SMA stenosis, are often complex and risky, particularly for patients unsuitable for conventional surgery. <b>Objective:</b> This study details the application of retrograde recanalization followed by the deployment of a VIABAHN covered stent in a patient with complete SMA ostium occlusion. <b>Methods:</b> The procedure's success in re-establishing mesenteric blood flow demonstrates its potential as a less invasive, safer alternative to traditional surgical approaches. This technique's innovation lies in its retrograde approach, allowing for effective treatment in cases where antegrade access is unfeasible. <b>Results:</b> The patient showed significant symptom improvement without procedural complications, underscoring the method's efficacy and safety. <b>Conclusion</b>: These findings suggest that retrograde stent implantation can be a viable option for managing SMA occlusions, especially in high-risk surgical cases. The successful application of this technique in this case contributes to the evolving landscape of endovascular interventions in vascular surgery and offers a promising direction for future research and clinical practice in treating SMA-related conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514322/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142047696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A 53 year old woman needed surgical management of an anastomotic pseudoaneurysm after renal transplant. Contrast enhanced computed tomography demonstrated a pseudoaneurysm arising off of the right external iliac artery. Considering the risk of potentially sacrificing her renal transplant, we elected to perform endovascular repair with parallel stent grafting. The operation was successful and postoperative course uneventful illustrating that this approach may be beneficial in similar circumstances.
{"title":"Case Report: Treatment of Transplanted Renal Artery Anastomotic Pseudoaneurysm With Parallel Stent Grafting.","authors":"Anil Shah, Rishabh Matta, Isabel Billiar, Satish Muluk","doi":"10.1177/15385744241280542","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241280542","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 53 year old woman needed surgical management of an anastomotic pseudoaneurysm after renal transplant. Contrast enhanced computed tomography demonstrated a pseudoaneurysm arising off of the right external iliac artery. Considering the risk of potentially sacrificing her renal transplant, we elected to perform endovascular repair with parallel stent grafting. The operation was successful and postoperative course uneventful illustrating that this approach may be beneficial in similar circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142116650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-29DOI: 10.1177/15385744241278048
Khuzaima Khan, Eiman Amir, Omobolaji Akano, Joseph Borucki, Ahmad Al Thaher, Philip Stather, Tariq Ali
Background: Endovascular therapy has become increasingly preferred in the diagnosis and treatment of various conditions. The choice of arterial access usually depends on the type of procedure being performed with most via the common femoral artery and increasingly via the radial artery. Percutaneous access via the brachial artery has however been approached with caution due to the perceived increased risk for development of complications. Percutaneous brachial artery access (pBAA) has insufficient evidence when compared to femoral and radial access, with no large-scale studies available. The objective of this study is to review the literature and report the clinical and radiological complications associated with pBAA.
Methods: EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL and Medline were searched for existing data on the complications associated with pBAA. Systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out on the data of 31 studies.
Results: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that the probability of post procedural haematoma was 4.76%, haemorrhage 1.43%, perforation 1.11% pseudoaneurysm 1.06%, spasm 0.9%, thrombus 0.55%, neuropathy 0.53%, occlusion 0.51%, ischaemia 0.37% and infection 0.24 %. Non-target vessel puncture, stenosis and stroke had a 0% incidence among the assessed population.
Conclusion: This study provides evidence to support clinical decision making when it comes to the utility of pBAA in endovascular diagnosis or therapy. The results demonstrate that pBAA is relatively safe with a low incidence of serious complications and thereby provide the clinician with the option of an alternate access point when planning treatment.
{"title":"Challenging the Controversy Surrounding Percutaneous Brachial Artery Access Related Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Khuzaima Khan, Eiman Amir, Omobolaji Akano, Joseph Borucki, Ahmad Al Thaher, Philip Stather, Tariq Ali","doi":"10.1177/15385744241278048","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241278048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular therapy has become increasingly preferred in the diagnosis and treatment of various conditions. The choice of arterial access usually depends on the type of procedure being performed with most via the common femoral artery and increasingly via the radial artery. Percutaneous access via the brachial artery has however been approached with caution due to the perceived increased risk for development of complications. Percutaneous brachial artery access (pBAA) has insufficient evidence when compared to femoral and radial access, with no large-scale studies available. The objective of this study is to review the literature and report the clinical and radiological complications associated with pBAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL and Medline were searched for existing data on the complications associated with pBAA. Systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out on the data of 31 studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that the probability of post procedural haematoma was 4.76%, haemorrhage 1.43%, perforation 1.11% pseudoaneurysm 1.06%, spasm 0.9%, thrombus 0.55%, neuropathy 0.53%, occlusion 0.51%, ischaemia 0.37% and infection 0.24 %. Non-target vessel puncture, stenosis and stroke had a 0% incidence among the assessed population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence to support clinical decision making when it comes to the utility of pBAA in endovascular diagnosis or therapy. The results demonstrate that pBAA is relatively safe with a low incidence of serious complications and thereby provide the clinician with the option of an alternate access point when planning treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142116651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-28DOI: 10.1177/15385744241276650
Alhussein M Khedr, Mohammed S Foula, Mohammed Alsagheer Alhewy, Abdelaziz Ahmed Abdelhafez, Ibrahim Hanbal Hanbal, Ehab Abd Elmoneim Ghazala, Ahmed Atef Khamis, Hassan Gado, Wael Abdo Abdo Abd-Elgawad, Abdullah El Sayed, Awad Ibrahim, Yasser Elghoneimy, Abdelhalim A Abdelmohsen
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) through the femoral artery and vein can lead to significant vascular complications. We retrospectively studied the acute vascular complications of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID patients during the period from January 2020 to July 2023.
Results: Seventy-eight patients underwent VA-ECMO for various indications from January 2020 to July 2023. The studied patients had a mean age of 59.6 ± 6.9 years for non-COVID patients (38 patients), and 62.2 ± 7.6 years for COVID patients (40 patients), with a P = 0.268. In non-COVID patients, The baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The primary indications for ECMO were cardiac diseases, followed by respiratory failure (78.9% vs 10.5%). Conversely, in COVID patients, respiratory failure due to COVID-19 infection was the main indication (45% vs 40%). The overall incidence of general complications, including cerebrovascular stroke, acute kidney injury, intracardiac thrombi, and wound infection, was comparable in both groups (31.6% vs 45%). The overall incidence of vascular complications in both groups was 33.3%. Ipsilateral acute lower limb ischemia occurred in 5.3% vs 10% of non-COVID and COVID patients, respectively. Thrombosis of the distal perfusion catheter (DPC) occurred in 10.5% vs 15%, respectively.
Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increasing number of patients required VA-ECMO due to associated respiratory failure. Patients undergoing VA-ECMO are at high risk of developing various vascular complications. COVID-19 significantly increases the risk of acute limb ischemia and distal perfusion catheter thrombosis in both upper and lower limbs. However, other VA-ECMO-related vascular complications are comparable between COVID-19 and non-COVID patients.
{"title":"Acute Vascular Complications of VA-ECMO in COVID-19 Patients. Does COVID-19 Affect the Outcome?","authors":"Alhussein M Khedr, Mohammed S Foula, Mohammed Alsagheer Alhewy, Abdelaziz Ahmed Abdelhafez, Ibrahim Hanbal Hanbal, Ehab Abd Elmoneim Ghazala, Ahmed Atef Khamis, Hassan Gado, Wael Abdo Abdo Abd-Elgawad, Abdullah El Sayed, Awad Ibrahim, Yasser Elghoneimy, Abdelhalim A Abdelmohsen","doi":"10.1177/15385744241276650","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241276650","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) through the femoral artery and vein can lead to significant vascular complications. We retrospectively studied the acute vascular complications of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID patients during the period from January 2020 to July 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-eight patients underwent VA-ECMO for various indications from January 2020 to July 2023. The studied patients had a mean age of 59.6 ± 6.9 years for non-COVID patients (38 patients), and 62.2 ± 7.6 years for COVID patients (40 patients), with a <i>P</i> = 0.268. In non-COVID patients, The baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The primary indications for ECMO were cardiac diseases, followed by respiratory failure (78.9% vs 10.5%). Conversely, in COVID patients, respiratory failure due to COVID-19 infection was the main indication (45% vs 40%). The overall incidence of general complications, including cerebrovascular stroke, acute kidney injury, intracardiac thrombi, and wound infection, was comparable in both groups (31.6% vs 45%). The overall incidence of vascular complications in both groups was 33.3%. Ipsilateral acute lower limb ischemia occurred in 5.3% vs 10% of non-COVID and COVID patients, respectively. Thrombosis of the distal perfusion catheter (DPC) occurred in 10.5% vs 15%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increasing number of patients required VA-ECMO due to associated respiratory failure. Patients undergoing VA-ECMO are at high risk of developing various vascular complications. COVID-19 significantly increases the risk of acute limb ischemia and distal perfusion catheter thrombosis in both upper and lower limbs. However, other VA-ECMO-related vascular complications are comparable between COVID-19 and non-COVID patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-03DOI: 10.1177/15385744241276690
Maram Darwish, Mario D'Oria, Alexander Croo, Ryan Gouveia Melo, Lewis Meecham
Introduction: Developed by the Global Vascular Guidelines committee, the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) is an angiographic scoring system used for quantifying infrainguinal disease extent and predicting treatment success with endovascular techniques (EVT). Currently, no other risk prediction model is available for patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing EVT. GLASS' validation and adoption outside academic institutions for research are limited. Thus, this longitudinal multicenter prospective study aims to examine GLASS' validity and reliability in predicting major acute limb events and overall survival (OS) in patients with CLTI undergoing EVT.
Methods and analysis: This prospective, international, multicenter, observational study will include patients with CLTI undergoing EVT (PROMOTE-GLASS) (ClinicalTrials.gov; ID: NCT06186544) identified through routine clinical referrals and emergency visits to vascular units in participating centers. Only patients who are referred for EVT will be recruited. The primary outcomes are immediate technical success, immediate technical failure, and 1-year limb base patency. The secondary outcomes are major adverse limb events, major lower limb amputation, and OS in patients presenting with CLTI who undergo EVT up to 1 year after the procedure. Clinical and imaging data will be analyzed at the end of follow-up to validate risk prediction. This protocol outlines our approach for identifying cases, GLASS score calculation, outcome measures assessment, and a statistical analysis plan.
Anticipated implications: PROMOTE-GLASS holds significant implications and can potentially revolutionize clinical decision-making by assisting clinicians in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from EVT. Ultimately, reduce the need for more invasive procedures and improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, PROMOTE-GLASS can provide useful information, including patient selection, for future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating EVT for CLTI. PROMOTE-GLASS anticipated implications on the vascular community are rooted in its potential to improve patient care, inform future research, and address limitations in existing literature regarding CLTI treatment outcomes.
{"title":"Prospective Multi-Center Longitudinal Study to Validate Accuracy of the Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) Score in Predicting Major Acute Limb Events in Patients With Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Intervention: The PROMOTE-GLASS Study Protocol.","authors":"Maram Darwish, Mario D'Oria, Alexander Croo, Ryan Gouveia Melo, Lewis Meecham","doi":"10.1177/15385744241276690","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241276690","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Developed by the Global Vascular Guidelines committee, the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) is an angiographic scoring system used for quantifying infrainguinal disease extent and predicting treatment success with endovascular techniques (EVT). Currently, no other risk prediction model is available for patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing EVT. GLASS' validation and adoption outside academic institutions for research are limited. Thus, this longitudinal multicenter prospective study aims to examine GLASS' validity and reliability in predicting major acute limb events and overall survival (OS) in patients with CLTI undergoing EVT.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This prospective, international, multicenter, observational study will include patients with CLTI undergoing EVT (PROMOTE-GLASS) (ClinicalTrials.gov; ID: NCT06186544) identified through routine clinical referrals and emergency visits to vascular units in participating centers. Only patients who are referred for EVT will be recruited. The primary outcomes are immediate technical success, immediate technical failure, and 1-year limb base patency. The secondary outcomes are major adverse limb events, major lower limb amputation, and OS in patients presenting with CLTI who undergo EVT up to 1 year after the procedure. Clinical and imaging data will be analyzed at the end of follow-up to validate risk prediction. This protocol outlines our approach for identifying cases, GLASS score calculation, outcome measures assessment, and a statistical analysis plan.</p><p><strong>Anticipated implications: </strong>PROMOTE-GLASS holds significant implications and can potentially revolutionize clinical decision-making by assisting clinicians in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from EVT. Ultimately, reduce the need for more invasive procedures and improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, PROMOTE-GLASS can provide useful information, including patient selection, for future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating EVT for CLTI. PROMOTE-GLASS anticipated implications on the vascular community are rooted in its potential to improve patient care, inform future research, and address limitations in existing literature regarding CLTI treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}