Culture of photosynthetic microalgae consortium in artificial produced water supplemented with liquid digestate in closed column photobioreactors and open-pond raceway

IF 5.8 2区 生物学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Biomass & Bioenergy Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107165
Aurélien Parsy , Elena Ficara , Valeria Mezzanotte , Marco Mantovani , Rémy Guyoneaud , Florian Monlau , Cecilia Sambusiti
{"title":"Culture of photosynthetic microalgae consortium in artificial produced water supplemented with liquid digestate in closed column photobioreactors and open-pond raceway","authors":"Aurélien Parsy ,&nbsp;Elena Ficara ,&nbsp;Valeria Mezzanotte ,&nbsp;Marco Mantovani ,&nbsp;Rémy Guyoneaud ,&nbsp;Florian Monlau ,&nbsp;Cecilia Sambusiti","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Large amounts of produced water are extracted by the Oil and Gas energy sector since the industrial revolution. This available water, often salty, can be used to dilute liquid digestate from the anaerobic digestion process, a promising source of nutrients for microalgae cultivation. The study investigates the growth of halotolerant microalgae and their associated bacteria in column photobioreactors (PBRs) and open raceway pond (RWP), to treat industrial wastewaters while producing biomass for energy valorisation. Microalgae were cultured in mixtures of saline artificial produced water (7–44 %v/v), liquid digestate (5 %v/v using PBRs, 29–63 %v/v using RWP) and seawater. <em>Nannochloropsis oceanica</em> and <em>Tetraselmis suecica</em> strains were firstly cultivated in 70 L PBRs in indoor conditions for 3 months and later in 1.1 m<sup>3</sup> RWP operated in outdoor conditions for 5 months in spring-summer period. In PBRs, average productivity was 9.0 ± 4.2 gVSS·m<sup>−2</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> (102–153 mgVSS·L<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>), with daily removal efficiencies for chemical oxygen demand, nitrogen and phosphorous up to 61.8, 31.6 and 97.2 %, respectively. In RWP, strong changes in the microalgae populations were observed. Productivity was 6.7 ± 5.2 gVSS·m<sup>−2</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> (30 ± 23 mgVSS·L<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>), with daily removal efficiencies for chemical oxygen demand, nitrogen and phosphorous up to 48.4, 44.4 and 88.1 %, respectively. In parallel with the production of microalgae, a nitrifying microbial population grew in the RWP despite the high salinity (70 g L<sup>−1</sup>). Over these periods of several months, microalgae production was maintained using a culture medium containing high salt concentration, metals and harmful aromatic compounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953424001181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large amounts of produced water are extracted by the Oil and Gas energy sector since the industrial revolution. This available water, often salty, can be used to dilute liquid digestate from the anaerobic digestion process, a promising source of nutrients for microalgae cultivation. The study investigates the growth of halotolerant microalgae and their associated bacteria in column photobioreactors (PBRs) and open raceway pond (RWP), to treat industrial wastewaters while producing biomass for energy valorisation. Microalgae were cultured in mixtures of saline artificial produced water (7–44 %v/v), liquid digestate (5 %v/v using PBRs, 29–63 %v/v using RWP) and seawater. Nannochloropsis oceanica and Tetraselmis suecica strains were firstly cultivated in 70 L PBRs in indoor conditions for 3 months and later in 1.1 m3 RWP operated in outdoor conditions for 5 months in spring-summer period. In PBRs, average productivity was 9.0 ± 4.2 gVSS·m−2·d−1 (102–153 mgVSS·L−1·d−1), with daily removal efficiencies for chemical oxygen demand, nitrogen and phosphorous up to 61.8, 31.6 and 97.2 %, respectively. In RWP, strong changes in the microalgae populations were observed. Productivity was 6.7 ± 5.2 gVSS·m−2·d−1 (30 ± 23 mgVSS·L−1·d−1), with daily removal efficiencies for chemical oxygen demand, nitrogen and phosphorous up to 48.4, 44.4 and 88.1 %, respectively. In parallel with the production of microalgae, a nitrifying microbial population grew in the RWP despite the high salinity (70 g L−1). Over these periods of several months, microalgae production was maintained using a culture medium containing high salt concentration, metals and harmful aromatic compounds.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在封闭式柱状光生物反应器和开放式池塘赛道中,用人工生产的水和液态沼渣培养光合微藻群
自工业革命以来,石油和天然气能源行业提取了大量的采出水。这些可利用的水通常含盐,可用于稀释厌氧消化过程中产生的液态沼渣,这是微藻类培养很有前景的营养来源。本研究调查了耐盐微藻及其相关细菌在柱式光生物反应器(PBR)和开放式赛道池塘(RWP)中的生长情况,以处理工业废水,同时生产生物质,实现能源价值化。微藻类在含盐人工生产用水(7-44 %v/v)、液态沼渣(使用 PBRs 时为 5 %v/v,使用 RWP 时为 29-63 %v/v)和海水的混合物中进行培养。在春夏季节,首先在室内 70 升 PBR 中培养海洋藻类(Nannochloropsis oceanica)和四鳃藻(Tetraselmis suecica)3 个月,然后在室外 1.1 立方米 RWP 中培养 5 个月。在 PBR 中,平均生产率为 9.0 ± 4.2 gVSS-m-2-d-1 (102-153 mgVSS-L-1-d-1),化学需氧量、氮和磷的日去除率分别达到 61.8%、31.6% 和 97.2%。在 RWP 中,观察到微藻种群发生了很大变化。产量为 6.7 ± 5.2 gVSS-m-2-d-1(30 ± 23 mgVSS-L-1-d-1),化学需氧量、氮和磷的日去除率分别达到 48.4%、44.4% 和 88.1%。在产生微藻的同时,尽管盐度很高(70 g L-1),RWP 中的硝化微生物种群也在增长。在这几个月的时间里,微藻类的生产一直使用含有高浓度盐、金属和有害芳香族化合物的培养基。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomass & Bioenergy
Biomass & Bioenergy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials. The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy. Key areas covered by the journal: • Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation. • Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal. • Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes • Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation • Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
期刊最新文献
Data-driven based financial analysis of concentrated solar power integrating biomass and thermal energy storage: A profitability perspective Insight into lignin oxidative depolymerization in ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents Lignocellulosic biomass to glycols: Simultaneous conversion of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin using an organic solvent Response of aromatic Rosa grass to different proportions of fly ash and vermicompost Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass waste for production of high-quality biochar: Corn stover and hemp stem case studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1