Identification and analysis of e-Learning development components and validation of e-LDC questionnaire based on four-lens model

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH E-Learning and Digital Media Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1177/20427530241240797
Zahra Karimian, Maria Masoudi
{"title":"Identification and analysis of e-Learning development components and validation of e-LDC questionnaire based on four-lens model","authors":"Zahra Karimian, Maria Masoudi","doi":"10.1177/20427530241240797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of e-learning in recent decades is one of the main policies of higher education administrators, but it requires the identification of development requirements and infrastructure. The aim of this study was to achieve two objectives: identifying the components of e-learning development (e-LDC) and validation of the eLDC tools. The study was conducted in 2020 on 156 faculty members of the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The research utilized random sampling through email and e-questionnaires. The research tool employed was a valid questionnaire based on a four-dimensional model . The research tool was a valid questionnaire based on the four-dimensional model (Bolman and Deal, 2003) with 32 items in four components: human resource (9), structural (8), political (6) and symbolic (9). The validity of the instrument was confirmed by CVI = 0.914, CVR = 0.83 and Cronbach’s-alpha of 0.969. 18 (11.5%) were instructors, 80 (51.3%) were assistant professors, 39 (25%) were associate professors, and 19 (12.2%) were professors. In the factor analysis test, KMO = 0.944 and the significance of Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity with ( p < 0.0001) confirmed the adequacy of the sample and the appropriateness of the test. According to the Scree Polt diagram and the variance explained, the four factors are cultural, structural, political, and manpower, respectively, influencing the development of e-learning. The explained common value of all items was more than 0.5 and the fit of the questionnaire at the special point was 67.12%. The development of e-learning in the universities requires a comprehensive view on the provision of infrastructure and e-learning requirements. But cultural development and modification of faculty members’ beliefs in e-learning is the most important factor and can be effective in the development of other factors.","PeriodicalId":29943,"journal":{"name":"E-Learning and Digital Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Learning and Digital Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241240797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of e-learning in recent decades is one of the main policies of higher education administrators, but it requires the identification of development requirements and infrastructure. The aim of this study was to achieve two objectives: identifying the components of e-learning development (e-LDC) and validation of the eLDC tools. The study was conducted in 2020 on 156 faculty members of the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The research utilized random sampling through email and e-questionnaires. The research tool employed was a valid questionnaire based on a four-dimensional model . The research tool was a valid questionnaire based on the four-dimensional model (Bolman and Deal, 2003) with 32 items in four components: human resource (9), structural (8), political (6) and symbolic (9). The validity of the instrument was confirmed by CVI = 0.914, CVR = 0.83 and Cronbach’s-alpha of 0.969. 18 (11.5%) were instructors, 80 (51.3%) were assistant professors, 39 (25%) were associate professors, and 19 (12.2%) were professors. In the factor analysis test, KMO = 0.944 and the significance of Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity with ( p < 0.0001) confirmed the adequacy of the sample and the appropriateness of the test. According to the Scree Polt diagram and the variance explained, the four factors are cultural, structural, political, and manpower, respectively, influencing the development of e-learning. The explained common value of all items was more than 0.5 and the fit of the questionnaire at the special point was 67.12%. The development of e-learning in the universities requires a comprehensive view on the provision of infrastructure and e-learning requirements. But cultural development and modification of faculty members’ beliefs in e-learning is the most important factor and can be effective in the development of other factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于四透镜模型的电子学习开发要素的识别和分析以及电子学习开发问卷的验证
近几十年来,发展电子学习是高等教育管理者的主要政策之一,但这需要确定发展要求和基础设施。本研究旨在实现两个目标:确定电子学习发展(e-LDC)的组成部分和验证 eLDC 工具。研究于 2020 年进行,对象是设拉子医科大学的 156 名教师。研究通过电子邮件和电子问卷进行随机抽样。采用的研究工具是基于四维模型的有效问卷。研究工具是一份基于四维模型的有效问卷(Bolman 和 Deal,2003 年),共有 32 个项目,分为四个部分:人力资源(9 个)、结构(8 个)、政治(6 个)和象征(9 个)。CVI = 0.914,CVR = 0.83,Cronbach's-alpha 为 0.969,证实了该工具的有效性。18 人(11.5%)为讲师,80 人(51.3%)为助教,39 人(25%)为副教授,19 人(12.2%)为教授。在因子分析检验中,KMO = 0.944,巴特利特分散性检验(P < 0.0001)的显著性证实了样本的充分性和检验的适当性。根据 Scree Polt 图和方差解释,影响电子学习发展的四个因素分别是文化因素、结构因素、政治因素和人力因素。所有项目的解释共同值均大于 0.5,问卷在特殊点的拟合度为 67.12%。要在大学中发展电子学习,就必须全面考虑提供基础设施和电子学习的要求。但文化建设和教职员工电子学习信念的改变是最重要的因素,可以有效地促进其他因素的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
E-Learning and Digital Media
E-Learning and Digital Media EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing E-learning in higher education: Lessons learned from the pandemic How much ICT literacy is required? The epistemic perceptual framework of Iranian university faculty members during the COVID-19 pandemic AI in the language classroom: Insights from pre-service English teachers The challenges of implementing digital learning platforms in the ministry of information and digitalization in Malawi Enhancing student experience in remote computer programming course practice: A case of the Java language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1