Design Thinking for Architects: A Critique of International Education Models

Nick Shavishvili, Nino Akhobadze
{"title":"Design Thinking for Architects: A Critique of International Education Models","authors":"Nick Shavishvili, Nino Akhobadze","doi":"10.36073/1512-0996-2024-1-39-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The appropriateness of teaching design thinking to architecture students in Georgia is discussed. Design thinking is a user-centered method that was developed about 60 years ago and is widely used in almost all areas of design, including architecture. Leading architectural firms embrace design thinking. This method also has many opponents, who complain about the lack of creativity, its collective work, and more. In contrast, advocates of design thinking argue that design thinking approaches do not necessarily limit creativity, and that contemporary architecture has become so complex that specialists of only one field cannot account for everything. It is interesting that the main opposition to this methodology was met in the country where it was born – the USA. As for Georgia, the survey of students conducted by the authors of the article at the International Design School of the Georgian Technical University found that the majority of them have a positive attitude and intend to use design thinking in their future activities.","PeriodicalId":23911,"journal":{"name":"Works of Georgian Technical University","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Works of Georgian Technical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36073/1512-0996-2024-1-39-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The appropriateness of teaching design thinking to architecture students in Georgia is discussed. Design thinking is a user-centered method that was developed about 60 years ago and is widely used in almost all areas of design, including architecture. Leading architectural firms embrace design thinking. This method also has many opponents, who complain about the lack of creativity, its collective work, and more. In contrast, advocates of design thinking argue that design thinking approaches do not necessarily limit creativity, and that contemporary architecture has become so complex that specialists of only one field cannot account for everything. It is interesting that the main opposition to this methodology was met in the country where it was born – the USA. As for Georgia, the survey of students conducted by the authors of the article at the International Design School of the Georgian Technical University found that the majority of them have a positive attitude and intend to use design thinking in their future activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑师的设计思维:国际教育模式批判
本文讨论了在佐治亚州向建筑专业学生教授设计思维是否合适的问题。设计思维是一种以用户为中心的方法,在大约 60 年前被提出,并广泛应用于包括建筑在内的几乎所有设计领域。领先的建筑公司都接受设计思维。这种方法也有许多反对者,他们抱怨这种方法缺乏创造性、集体工作等。与此相反,设计思维的拥护者则认为,设计思维方法并不一定会限制创造力,而且当代建筑已经变得如此复杂,仅靠某一领域的专家不可能面面俱到。有趣的是,这种方法的主要反对者是在它的诞生国--美国。至于格鲁吉亚,文章作者在格鲁吉亚技术大学国际设计学院对学生进行的调查发现,大多数学生持积极态度,并打算在未来的活动中使用设计思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
History of the Development of Mechanized Assault Bridges and Major Trends Socio-economic Aspects of Migration in Georgia Urgency of Pension Reform in Georgia The Connection of Pandemics with Architecture Research on the Need for Beneficiaries of Integration and Reintegration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1