“Completely Free”: How a Subsumption of Labour and Nature Framework Explains the Surprising Expressions of “Freedom” by Immigrant Worm pickers in Ontario

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Antipode Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1111/anti.13037
Joshua Steckley
{"title":"“Completely Free”: How a Subsumption of Labour and Nature Framework Explains the Surprising Expressions of “Freedom” by Immigrant Worm pickers in Ontario","authors":"Joshua Steckley","doi":"10.1111/anti.13037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Canadian nightcrawler (<i>Lumbricus terrestris</i>) worms, the most popular live bait for recreational freshwater anglers, are hand-picked from Ontario dairy farmers’ fields by an immigrant labour force working in the middle of the night with limited equipment. Though no picker enjoys the arduous activity of picking worms, they do express feelings of “freedom” and “autonomy” in the job. Such expressions are surprising coming from mostly non-English-speaking immigrants, labouring with bent backs under dreary conditions producing profit for their employers in an unregulated industry. To understand these counterintuitive conceptions of freedom, I connect debates around “un/free labour” and “constrained agency” with the Marxist concepts of formal and real subsumption of labour and nature to reveal how the ecological conditions of commodity production shape capitalist control over labour. I argue worm-picker agency should be understood by seeing how the subsumption of labour is related to the subsumption of nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"56 5","pages":"1927-1948"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anti.13037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.13037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canadian nightcrawler (Lumbricus terrestris) worms, the most popular live bait for recreational freshwater anglers, are hand-picked from Ontario dairy farmers’ fields by an immigrant labour force working in the middle of the night with limited equipment. Though no picker enjoys the arduous activity of picking worms, they do express feelings of “freedom” and “autonomy” in the job. Such expressions are surprising coming from mostly non-English-speaking immigrants, labouring with bent backs under dreary conditions producing profit for their employers in an unregulated industry. To understand these counterintuitive conceptions of freedom, I connect debates around “un/free labour” and “constrained agency” with the Marxist concepts of formal and real subsumption of labour and nature to reveal how the ecological conditions of commodity production shape capitalist control over labour. I argue worm-picker agency should be understood by seeing how the subsumption of labour is related to the subsumption of nature.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"完全自由":劳动和自然的次消费框架如何解释安大略省拾虫移民对 "自由 "的惊人表达
加拿大夜叉(Lumbricus terrestris)蚯蚓是最受休闲淡水垂钓者欢迎的活饵料,由移民劳动力在设备有限的情况下在半夜从安大略奶农的田里手工采摘。虽然没有一个采摘者喜欢采摘蚯蚓这种艰苦的活动,但他们确实在工作中表达了 "自由 "和 "自主 "的感受。他们大多是不讲英语的移民,在恶劣的条件下弯腰劳动,在不受监管的行业中为雇主创造利润,他们的这种表达令人惊讶。为了理解这些反直觉的自由概念,我将围绕 "非自由劳动 "和 "受约束的代理权 "的争论与马克思主义关于劳动和自然的形式归属和实际归属的概念联系起来,以揭示商品生产的生态条件是如何形成资本主义对劳动的控制的。我认为,要理解拾虫者的代理权,就应该看到劳动的归属与自然的归属之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antipode
Antipode GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Referees, July 2023–June 2024 Offshore Citizenship: “Diversified Citizenship Portfolios” and the Regulatory Arbitrage of Global Wealth Elites Resisting Post-Political Adaptation to Climate Change: How a Small Community Stood Up to Big Development Sports Cages as Social Infrastructure: Sociality, Context, and Contest in Hackney's Cages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1