Effectiveness of County Communication Approaches in Facilitating Public Participation in Kenya’s Devolved Governments

E. M. Wasike, Masibo Lumala, Jane Malel
{"title":"Effectiveness of County Communication Approaches in Facilitating Public Participation in Kenya’s Devolved Governments","authors":"E. M. Wasike, Masibo Lumala, Jane Malel","doi":"10.47672/ajc.1884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this research was to evaluate the efficacy of county communication frameworks in fostering public participation in Kenya’s 47 devolved governments. Effective communication is both a function and proof of good governance. Thus the significance of county communication facilitating enduring citizen participation in policy making and implementation processes cannot be overstated. The evaluation of county communication approaches was conducted in alignment with overall objectives outlined in the County Government Act of 2012. These objectives include: creating awareness on devolution and governance; promotion of peace and cohesion; advocacy for development, and promotion of the freedom of the media. \nMethodology: The present study adopted a qualitative research approach. The research targeted 8 counties clustered in county economic blocs of North Rift Economic Bloc (NOREB), Lake Region Economic Bloc LREB, Frontier Counties Development Council (FCDC) , South Eastern Kenya Economic Block (SEKEB), Mt Kenya and Aberdares Economic Bloc, Jumuiya ya Kaunti za Pwani( JKP), Narok and Kajiado Economic Block(NAKAEB) and Nairobi City County. The counties purposely selected to represent each of these economic blocs include: Trans Nzoia, Kisumu, Mandera, Makueni, Meru, Kwale, Narok and Nairobi. This study used both primary and secondary methods to collect data. In-depth interviews were used to collect primary data from 26 participants, specifically, from Council of Governors, Sub-County Administrators, County Assemblies Forum, County Directors of Communication and Community Based Organizations. They were purposively chosen for their role in communicating, facilitating, and monitoring public participation. Secondary data was collected mainly from national dataset, surveys, and reports from ministries, departments, and agencies. \nFindings: The findings show that concept of public participation is deeply rooted in the Constitution of Kenya 2010. County communication frameworks embed strategic communication approaches for policy making and implementation in devolved governments. The finds show that the level of understanding of devolution among Kenyans varies. Those in urban and city counties have a greater appreciation of decentralization while those in rural counties have limited understanding of devolution and its implication. Majority of Kenyans have difficulty distinguishing functions of devolved governments from those assigned to the national government by the CoK 2010. Additionally, county governments are required to promote peace and cohesion among the residents. The findings show that this objective receives less emphasis and is not a priority of counties, with the exception of frontier counties. However, counties promote development in their jurisdiction recognizing that they have a responsibility to stimulate investments that create jobs for unemployed and generally improve living standards of the residents. Finally, county governments have a role to play in ensuring media practice remain free from any interference even though this responsibility lie with the national government.  \nImplications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Based on the review of the literature and findings of this study, the study recommends that county governments should meaningfully engage citizens in governance by first, empowering them to understand their responsibility and secondly, allowing them to engage meaningfully in issues that affect them. To achieve this, county governments should establish mechanisms that promote civic education, public participation and access to information as provided in the County Government Act 2012.","PeriodicalId":103346,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Communication","volume":"66 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajc.1884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this research was to evaluate the efficacy of county communication frameworks in fostering public participation in Kenya’s 47 devolved governments. Effective communication is both a function and proof of good governance. Thus the significance of county communication facilitating enduring citizen participation in policy making and implementation processes cannot be overstated. The evaluation of county communication approaches was conducted in alignment with overall objectives outlined in the County Government Act of 2012. These objectives include: creating awareness on devolution and governance; promotion of peace and cohesion; advocacy for development, and promotion of the freedom of the media. Methodology: The present study adopted a qualitative research approach. The research targeted 8 counties clustered in county economic blocs of North Rift Economic Bloc (NOREB), Lake Region Economic Bloc LREB, Frontier Counties Development Council (FCDC) , South Eastern Kenya Economic Block (SEKEB), Mt Kenya and Aberdares Economic Bloc, Jumuiya ya Kaunti za Pwani( JKP), Narok and Kajiado Economic Block(NAKAEB) and Nairobi City County. The counties purposely selected to represent each of these economic blocs include: Trans Nzoia, Kisumu, Mandera, Makueni, Meru, Kwale, Narok and Nairobi. This study used both primary and secondary methods to collect data. In-depth interviews were used to collect primary data from 26 participants, specifically, from Council of Governors, Sub-County Administrators, County Assemblies Forum, County Directors of Communication and Community Based Organizations. They were purposively chosen for their role in communicating, facilitating, and monitoring public participation. Secondary data was collected mainly from national dataset, surveys, and reports from ministries, departments, and agencies. Findings: The findings show that concept of public participation is deeply rooted in the Constitution of Kenya 2010. County communication frameworks embed strategic communication approaches for policy making and implementation in devolved governments. The finds show that the level of understanding of devolution among Kenyans varies. Those in urban and city counties have a greater appreciation of decentralization while those in rural counties have limited understanding of devolution and its implication. Majority of Kenyans have difficulty distinguishing functions of devolved governments from those assigned to the national government by the CoK 2010. Additionally, county governments are required to promote peace and cohesion among the residents. The findings show that this objective receives less emphasis and is not a priority of counties, with the exception of frontier counties. However, counties promote development in their jurisdiction recognizing that they have a responsibility to stimulate investments that create jobs for unemployed and generally improve living standards of the residents. Finally, county governments have a role to play in ensuring media practice remain free from any interference even though this responsibility lie with the national government.  Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Based on the review of the literature and findings of this study, the study recommends that county governments should meaningfully engage citizens in governance by first, empowering them to understand their responsibility and secondly, allowing them to engage meaningfully in issues that affect them. To achieve this, county governments should establish mechanisms that promote civic education, public participation and access to information as provided in the County Government Act 2012.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
县级传播方法在促进肯尼亚权力下放政府的公众参与方面的有效性
目的:本研究旨在评估县级交流框架在促进肯尼亚 47 个下放政府的公众参与方面的效 果。有效的沟通既是善治的功能,也是善治的证明。因此,县级传播促进公民持久参与政策制定和实施过程的重要性怎么强调都不为过。对县级传播方法的评估是根据 2012 年《县级政府法》概述的总体目标进行的。这些目标包括:提高对权力下放和治理的认识;促进和平与凝聚力;倡导发展以及促进媒体自由。研究方法:本研究采用定性研究方法。研究对象为北裂谷经济区 (NOREB)、湖区经济区 (LREB)、边境县发展委员会 (FCDC)、肯尼亚东南部经济区 (SEKEB)、肯尼亚山和阿伯达雷斯经济区、Jumuiya ya Kaunti za Pwani(JKP)、纳罗克和卡贾多经济区 (NAKAEB) 以及内罗毕市县的 8 个县。特意选定代表这些经济区的县包括外恩佐亚、基苏木、曼德拉、马库尼、梅鲁、夸莱、纳罗克和内罗毕。本研究采用主要和次要方法收集数据。通过深入访谈收集了 26 名参与者的主要数据,特别是来自州长理事会、县以下行政长官、县议会论坛、县通信主任和社区组织的数据。之所以有目的地选择他们,是因为他们在沟通、促进和监督公众参与方面发挥着重要作用。二手数据主要从国家数据集、调查以及各部委、部门和机构的报告中收集。研究结果研究结果表明,公众参与的概念已深深扎根于 2010 年《肯尼亚宪法》。县级传播框架将战略传播方法纳入了权力下放政府的政策制定和执行工作。研究结果表明,肯尼亚人对权力下放的理解程度各不相同。城市和市县的人更了解权力下放,而农村县的人对权力下放及其影响的了解有限。大多数肯尼亚人难以区分下放政府的职能与 2010 年《肯尼亚宪法》赋予国家政府的职能。此外,县政府必须促进居民之间的和平与团结。调查结果表明,除边境县外,县政府对这一目标的重视程度较低,也未将其作为优先事项。不过,各州认识到,它们有责任刺激投资,为失业者创造就业机会,并普遍提高居民的生活水平,从而促进本辖区的发展。最后,尽管国家政府有责任确保媒体工作不受任何干扰,但县政府也有责任确保媒体工作不受任何干扰。 对理论、实践和政策的影响:根据文献综述和本研究的结果,本研究建议县政府应通过以下方式让公民有意义地参与治理:首先,让他们了解自己的责任;其次,让他们有意义地参与影响他们的问题。为实现这一目标,县政府应根据 2012 年《县政府法》的规定,建立促进公民教育、公众参与和信息获取的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Audience’s Perception of X (Formerly Twitter) Trends as a Tool for the Nigerian Public Sphere The Influence of Interpersonal Communication Participants on Child Nutrition Promotion in Kilifi County, Kenya Information Source Attributes and Terrorism Risk Preparedness among the Residents of Nairobi City County Effectiveness of County Communication Approaches in Facilitating Public Participation in Kenya’s Devolved Governments Corporate Artefacts and Customer Satisfaction in Public Secondary Schools in Nairobi County, Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1