EXPRESS: Hiding behind Complexity: Supply Chain, Oversight, Race, and the Opioid Crisis

IF 4.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Production and Operations Management Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1177/10591478241242126
Iman Attari, Jonathan E. Helm, Jorge Mejia
{"title":"EXPRESS: Hiding behind Complexity: Supply Chain, Oversight, Race, and the Opioid Crisis","authors":"Iman Attari, Jonathan E. Helm, Jorge Mejia","doi":"10.1177/10591478241242126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The opioid crisis has ravaged the United States, taking 69,000 lives in 2020, with prescription opioids accounting for 98% of opioid abuse. Although this epidemic is often considered a White public health crisis nationally, overdose deaths among people of color doubled from 2017–2019. As research has shown that the crisis was fueled by excessive supply from the pharmaceutical industry, several individual firms have received significant public criticism. However, we find evidence that the scope of the blame transcends individual actors to indict the very structure of complex supply chains, which may have exacerbated the crisis by dispensing significantly more opioids. In specific, we posit that supply chain complexity allowed mass quantities of opioids to escape detection by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Further, we find new evidence showing the greater impact of complexity on opioid dispensing in non-White communities, which underscores their exclusion from the public discourse and governmental response surrounding the crisis and suggests possible racial bias in the DEA’s regulatory policies. Our analysis was made possible by the 2019 release of the DEA’s ARCOS database, which logged every shipment in the US opioid supply chain from 2006–2014. Using a fixed effects model, we find that a one-unit increase across three dimensions of supply chain complexity is associated with a 16% increase in opioid dispensing. This effect is intensified in non-White communities, where a 10% increase in the non-White population is associated with a 3.39% (1.33%) increase in opioid dispensing by pharmacies that have supply chains with high (average) complexity. To verify that high-complexity pharmacies’ excess dispensing supplied non-medical/recreational demand, we exploit the reformulation of OxyContin (designed to prevent recreational use) as an exogenous shock to the market. In a novel approach, we leverage the fact that different pharmacies received their first shipment of reformulated OxyContin at different times and use a difference-in-differences model to estimate the heterogeneous effect of the shock on dispensing. As the reformulated OxyContin stifled demand, high-complexity pharmacies experienced a 15.31% greater reduction in dispensing compared to lower-complexity pharmacies, suggesting that their excess dispensing was indeed satisfying non-medical/recreational demand.","PeriodicalId":20623,"journal":{"name":"Production and Operations Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production and Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241242126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The opioid crisis has ravaged the United States, taking 69,000 lives in 2020, with prescription opioids accounting for 98% of opioid abuse. Although this epidemic is often considered a White public health crisis nationally, overdose deaths among people of color doubled from 2017–2019. As research has shown that the crisis was fueled by excessive supply from the pharmaceutical industry, several individual firms have received significant public criticism. However, we find evidence that the scope of the blame transcends individual actors to indict the very structure of complex supply chains, which may have exacerbated the crisis by dispensing significantly more opioids. In specific, we posit that supply chain complexity allowed mass quantities of opioids to escape detection by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Further, we find new evidence showing the greater impact of complexity on opioid dispensing in non-White communities, which underscores their exclusion from the public discourse and governmental response surrounding the crisis and suggests possible racial bias in the DEA’s regulatory policies. Our analysis was made possible by the 2019 release of the DEA’s ARCOS database, which logged every shipment in the US opioid supply chain from 2006–2014. Using a fixed effects model, we find that a one-unit increase across three dimensions of supply chain complexity is associated with a 16% increase in opioid dispensing. This effect is intensified in non-White communities, where a 10% increase in the non-White population is associated with a 3.39% (1.33%) increase in opioid dispensing by pharmacies that have supply chains with high (average) complexity. To verify that high-complexity pharmacies’ excess dispensing supplied non-medical/recreational demand, we exploit the reformulation of OxyContin (designed to prevent recreational use) as an exogenous shock to the market. In a novel approach, we leverage the fact that different pharmacies received their first shipment of reformulated OxyContin at different times and use a difference-in-differences model to estimate the heterogeneous effect of the shock on dispensing. As the reformulated OxyContin stifled demand, high-complexity pharmacies experienced a 15.31% greater reduction in dispensing compared to lower-complexity pharmacies, suggesting that their excess dispensing was indeed satisfying non-medical/recreational demand.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快讯:隐藏在复杂性背后:供应链、监督、种族和阿片类药物危机
阿片类药物危机肆虐美国,2020 年将夺走 69000 人的生命,其中处方阿片类药物占阿片类药物滥用的 98%。尽管这一流行病通常被认为是全国范围内的白人公共卫生危机,但从 2017-2019 年,有色人种过量用药致死的人数翻了一番。研究表明,制药业的过度供应助长了这一危机,因此有几家公司受到了公众的严厉批评。然而,我们发现有证据表明,指责的范围超越了单个行为者,而是对复杂供应链的结构本身提出了起诉,因为供应链可能通过配发更多阿片类药物而加剧了危机。具体而言,我们认为供应链的复杂性使得大量阿片类药物逃脱了缉毒署(DEA)的检测。此外,我们还发现了新的证据,显示复杂性对非白人社区阿片类药物配制的影响更大,这凸显了非白人社区被排斥在围绕危机的公共讨论和政府应对措施之外,并表明缉毒署的监管政策可能存在种族偏见。我们的分析得益于缉毒署 2019 年发布的 ARCOS 数据库,该数据库记录了 2006-2014 年间美国阿片类药物供应链中的每一批货物。利用固定效应模型,我们发现供应链复杂性的三个维度每增加一个单位,阿片类药物的配药量就会增加 16%。这种效应在非白人社区更为明显,非白人人口每增加 10%,供应链复杂度高(平均)的药店发放的阿片类药物就会增加 3.39%(1.33%)。为了验证高复杂度药店的超量配药是否供应了非医疗/娱乐需求,我们利用奥施康定的重新配方(旨在防止娱乐性使用)作为市场的外生冲击。我们采用一种新颖的方法,利用不同药店在不同时间收到第一批重新配制的奥施康定这一事实,使用差分模型来估计冲击对配药的异质性影响。由于重新配制的奥施康定抑制了需求,与复杂性较低的药店相比,复杂性较高的药店的配药量减少了 15.31%,这表明它们的超额配药量确实满足了非医疗/娱乐需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Production and Operations Management
Production and Operations Management 管理科学-工程:制造
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.00%
发文量
278
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Production and Operations Management is to serve as the flagship research journal in operations management in manufacturing and services. The journal publishes scientific research into the problems, interest, and concerns of managers who manage product and process design, operations, and supply chains. It covers all topics in product and process design, operations, and supply chain management and welcomes papers using any research paradigm.
期刊最新文献
Selection of Small and Diverse Suppliers and Contractual Performance: Do Set-Asides Pay Off? Aligning With Metrics: Differential Impact of IT and Organizational Metrics on Cognitive Coordination in Top Management Teams Will Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Commitment Improve Manufacturing Firms’ Market Performance? A Signaling Theory Perspective on DEI Announcements Ups and Downs in Experience Design Career Incentives of Political Leaders and Corporate Operational Efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1