Real-world effectiveness of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a retrospective, non-interventional cohort analysis

Michael Fu, A. Pivodic
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a retrospective, non-interventional cohort analysis","authors":"Michael Fu, A. Pivodic","doi":"10.1097/cp9.0000000000000077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown in clinical trials to improve outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Yet, it is still uncertain how effective they are in real-world patients with HFrEF. This study aimed to investigate the association between MRAs and outcomes in the overall population and a propensity score-matched cohort, based on patient-level data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF).\n \n \n \n Patients diagnosed with HFrEF were included from the SwedeHF spanning from 2003 to 2020. Enrollment was based on medication dispensation within 3 months before and 6 months after the index date recorded in the register. Endpoints included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and hospital re-admissions, tracked from the index date until censoring or occurrence of an event.\n \n \n \n Of 47,103 patients identified through the SwedeHF with HFrEF, 22,368 individuals were not treated with MRA (referred to as MRA naive patients), 21,893 were treated with MRA at a dosage of 25 mg, and 1,423 were treated with MRA at 50 mg once daily. In the overall cohort, the administration of MRA at 25 mg was associated with modest reductions in the risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 0.92 [0.89–0.95], P < 0.0001) and cardiovascular death (hazard ratio: 0.93 [0.89–0.98], P < 0.01) compared to the MRA naive group. However, both dosages of MRA (25 and 50 mg) were associated with a slight increase in the risk of hospital re-admissions due to heart failure 10% compared to MRA naive patients. These findings were consistent when examining a propensity score-matched cohort. Interaction analysis showed a significantly improved survival rate for patients receiving MRA at 25 mg compared to MRA naive individuals, particularly among those with an estimated glomerular rate ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 across all patients and in those aged 70 years and above.\n \n \n \n The administration of MRA treatment at 25 mg once daily was linked to a modestly improved survival in a real-life HFrEF population, with even more pronounced benefits observed within a specific subgroup. This finding highlights the importance of personalized medicine in providing customized therapeutic advantages.\n","PeriodicalId":502215,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Plus","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cp9.0000000000000077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown in clinical trials to improve outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Yet, it is still uncertain how effective they are in real-world patients with HFrEF. This study aimed to investigate the association between MRAs and outcomes in the overall population and a propensity score-matched cohort, based on patient-level data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF). Patients diagnosed with HFrEF were included from the SwedeHF spanning from 2003 to 2020. Enrollment was based on medication dispensation within 3 months before and 6 months after the index date recorded in the register. Endpoints included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and hospital re-admissions, tracked from the index date until censoring or occurrence of an event. Of 47,103 patients identified through the SwedeHF with HFrEF, 22,368 individuals were not treated with MRA (referred to as MRA naive patients), 21,893 were treated with MRA at a dosage of 25 mg, and 1,423 were treated with MRA at 50 mg once daily. In the overall cohort, the administration of MRA at 25 mg was associated with modest reductions in the risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 0.92 [0.89–0.95], P < 0.0001) and cardiovascular death (hazard ratio: 0.93 [0.89–0.98], P < 0.01) compared to the MRA naive group. However, both dosages of MRA (25 and 50 mg) were associated with a slight increase in the risk of hospital re-admissions due to heart failure 10% compared to MRA naive patients. These findings were consistent when examining a propensity score-matched cohort. Interaction analysis showed a significantly improved survival rate for patients receiving MRA at 25 mg compared to MRA naive individuals, particularly among those with an estimated glomerular rate ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 across all patients and in those aged 70 years and above. The administration of MRA treatment at 25 mg once daily was linked to a modestly improved survival in a real-life HFrEF population, with even more pronounced benefits observed within a specific subgroup. This finding highlights the importance of personalized medicine in providing customized therapeutic advantages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
矿物皮质激素受体拮抗剂对射血分数降低型心力衰竭的实际疗效:回顾性、非干预性队列分析
临床试验表明,矿物质皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)可改善射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)的预后。然而,这些药物在现实世界中对射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者的疗效如何仍不确定。本研究旨在根据瑞典心力衰竭登记处(SwedeHF)的患者水平数据,研究MRA与总体人群和倾向评分匹配队列的预后之间的关系。 瑞典心力衰竭登记处纳入了 2003 年至 2020 年期间诊断为 HFrEF 的患者。入组依据是登记册中记录的指数日期之前 3 个月和之后 6 个月内的用药情况。终点包括全因死亡率、心血管疾病死亡和再次入院,追踪时间从指数日期开始,直到剔除或发生事件为止。 在通过 SwedeHF 确定的 47,103 名 HFrEF 患者中,22,368 人未接受 MRA 治疗(称为 MRA 天真患者),21,893 人接受了剂量为 25 毫克的 MRA 治疗,1,423 人接受了剂量为 50 毫克、每天一次的 MRA 治疗。在整个队列中,与 MRA 天真组相比,服用 25 毫克剂量的 MRA 可适度降低全因死亡风险(危险比:0.92 [0.89-0.95],P < 0.0001)和心血管死亡风险(危险比:0.93 [0.89-0.98],P < 0.01)。不过,与 MRA 未接受治疗的患者相比,两种剂量的 MRA(25 毫克和 50 毫克)都会导致因心力衰竭再次入院的风险略微增加 10%。在研究倾向得分匹配队列时,这些发现是一致的。交互分析显示,与未接受 MRA 治疗的患者相比,接受 25 毫克 MRA 治疗的患者生存率明显提高,尤其是在所有患者中肾小球率≥30 毫升/分钟/1.73 平方米的患者以及 70 岁及以上的患者中。 在现实生活中,每天一次、每次 25 毫克的 MRA 治疗可适度改善 HFrEF 患者的生存率,在特定亚组中观察到的益处更为明显。这一发现凸显了个性化医疗在提供定制化治疗优势方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The evolving landscape of transcatheter aortic valve intervention: a focus on native pure aortic regurgitation Chinese expert consensus on anti-thrombotic therapy for pan-vascular diseases (2023 edition) Real-world effectiveness of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a retrospective, non-interventional cohort analysis Pan-vascular disease: what we have done in the past and what we can do in the future? Guideline-directed medical therapy in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and heart failure: current perspectives and practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1