Hannibal's hard ‘homecoming’ after 203 BCE

Q4 Arts and Humanities Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1556/068.2023.00117
Patrick Hunt
{"title":"Hannibal's hard ‘homecoming’ after 203 BCE","authors":"Patrick Hunt","doi":"10.1556/068.2023.00117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Hannibal's War” was what Carthage called the Second Punic War from 218–202 BCE because it was clear from the outset Carthaginian leadership was not fully participatory or even much engaged with him and his long Italian campaign. The signs of estrangement were seen at least as early as Hannibal's siege of Saguntum in 219 BCE when Carthage's Gerousia or Council of Elders took no responsibility with the envoy from Rome complaining about his “brutal” taking of Saguntum. But perhaps it is more important to examine exactly where – and when – Hannibal's real home might have been, since he could hardly call Carthage his true home, as this brief paper proposes. Discussion follows what Hannibal learned in Iberia and how important Iberia as his adopted homeland and its abundant silver meant to him instead – not Carthage – and how Iberia under his father Hamilcar prepared his lifelong stratagems for war, with Scipio as his eventual young rival student from Rome leading to Zama, which brought Hannibal back to Carthage under the worst circumstances and a periphery of his prior successes. Whether or not Hannibal's return to Carthage in 203–202 BCE can be called a “homecoming” is certainly moot in many ways, especially given that it was not his home for most of his life. Decades later, given his estrangement from Carthage, Scipio's famous epitaph could just as well be Hannibal's.","PeriodicalId":35670,"journal":{"name":"Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/068.2023.00117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Hannibal's War” was what Carthage called the Second Punic War from 218–202 BCE because it was clear from the outset Carthaginian leadership was not fully participatory or even much engaged with him and his long Italian campaign. The signs of estrangement were seen at least as early as Hannibal's siege of Saguntum in 219 BCE when Carthage's Gerousia or Council of Elders took no responsibility with the envoy from Rome complaining about his “brutal” taking of Saguntum. But perhaps it is more important to examine exactly where – and when – Hannibal's real home might have been, since he could hardly call Carthage his true home, as this brief paper proposes. Discussion follows what Hannibal learned in Iberia and how important Iberia as his adopted homeland and its abundant silver meant to him instead – not Carthage – and how Iberia under his father Hamilcar prepared his lifelong stratagems for war, with Scipio as his eventual young rival student from Rome leading to Zama, which brought Hannibal back to Carthage under the worst circumstances and a periphery of his prior successes. Whether or not Hannibal's return to Carthage in 203–202 BCE can be called a “homecoming” is certainly moot in many ways, especially given that it was not his home for most of his life. Decades later, given his estrangement from Carthage, Scipio's famous epitaph could just as well be Hannibal's.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公元前 203 年后汉尼拔艰难的 "返乡 "之路
"汉尼拔的战争 "是迦太基对公元前 218-202 年第二次布匿战争的称呼,因为从一开始迦太基的领导层就明显没有完全参与到汉尼拔和他在意大利的长期征战中,甚至没有太多的参与。至少早在公元前 219 年汉尼拔围攻萨贡图姆时,迦太基的格罗西亚(Gerousia)或长老会就已经出现了疏远的迹象,当时迦太基的格罗西亚(Gerousia)或长老会对来自罗马的使节抱怨汉尼拔 "野蛮 "攻占萨贡图姆不闻不问。但是,也许更重要的是研究汉尼拔真正的家究竟在哪里,以及何时,因为他很难称迦太基为真正的家,正如本文所提出的那样。本文将讨论汉尼拔在伊比利亚学到了什么,伊比利亚作为他的故乡以及丰富的白银对他来说有多么重要--而不是迦太基--以及他父亲哈米尔卡领导下的伊比利亚如何为战争准备了他毕生的计谋,西庇阿作为他最终的年轻对手,从罗马带着他的学生前往扎马,这让汉尼拔在最糟糕的情况下回到迦太基,成为他之前成功的外围。汉尼拔在公元前 203-202 年回到迦太基是否可以被称为 "回家",在很多方面肯定是没有意义的,尤其是考虑到迦太基在他生命的大部分时间里都不是他的家。几十年后,鉴于他与迦太基的疏远,西庇阿著名的墓志铭也可以成为汉尼拔的墓志铭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Acta Antiqua publishes original research papers, review articles and book reviews in the field of ancient studies. It covers the field of history, literature, philology and material culture of the Ancient East, the Classical Antiquity and, to a lesser part, of Byzantium and medieval Latin studies. Publishes book reviews and advertisements.
期刊最新文献
On the interaction between vowel confusions ( for /i/ and for /u/) and lexical stress in Latin inscriptions from Rome (ca. 119 BCE – ca. 600 CE) Demonstratives in the charters of St. Gall Vowel mergers in the Latin of the Danubian provinces of the Roman Empire as evidenced in inscriptions Lost in syllabification. Special cases of geminatio consonantium and syllabarum diuisio through the fringes of the Latin-Greek writing koine Inscriptions in stone, literacy in question: The confusion between and in inscriptions from Roman Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1