Judges and Social Networks

Carlos Manuel Rosales, Oscar Ruiz Vargas
{"title":"Judges and Social Networks","authors":"Carlos Manuel Rosales, Oscar Ruiz Vargas","doi":"10.6000/2817-2302.2024.03.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is essential that the judicial function be public, discreet, and professional. Its legitimacy as a public authority is acquired through the recognition of judgments, in which there is an identification between decisions and society. But what type of communication must be made by the judiciary, and especially by judges, to provide information about their activities, and ensure that their interaction strengthens the republic, generating proximity between the sovereign and the public power.","PeriodicalId":509601,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2024.03.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is essential that the judicial function be public, discreet, and professional. Its legitimacy as a public authority is acquired through the recognition of judgments, in which there is an identification between decisions and society. But what type of communication must be made by the judiciary, and especially by judges, to provide information about their activities, and ensure that their interaction strengthens the republic, generating proximity between the sovereign and the public power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法官和社交网络
司法职能必须具有公共性、谨慎性和专业性。司法机关作为公共权力机构的合法性是通过对判决的认可而获得的,在判决和社会之间存在着一种认同。但是,司法机构,尤其是法官必须进行何种类型的交流,以提供有关其活动的信息,并确保其互动能够加强共和国,在主权和公共权力之间产生亲近感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Algorithmic Decision Making: Can Artificial Intelligence and the Metaverse Provide Technological Solutions to Modernise the United Kingdom’s Legal Services and Criminal Justice? The Doctrine of Excessive Formalism in the Legal Theory and Practice of the European Court of Human Rights Local Self-Governance and State Power in the Russian Federation: In the Search for a Way Out of the Institutional Trap Judges and Social Networks The Implementation of Sustainable Development to Achieve Climate Justice: Indonesian Perspective as an Archipelagic State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1