Optimizing PEEK implant surfaces for improved stability and biocompatibility through sandblasting and the platinum coating approach

IF 2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.3389/fmech.2024.1360743
Afrah Faadhila, Mohamad Taufiqurrakhman, Puspita A. Katili, Siti Fauziyah Rahman, Delly Chipta Lestari, Y. Whulanza
{"title":"Optimizing PEEK implant surfaces for improved stability and biocompatibility through sandblasting and the platinum coating approach","authors":"Afrah Faadhila, Mohamad Taufiqurrakhman, Puspita A. Katili, Siti Fauziyah Rahman, Delly Chipta Lestari, Y. Whulanza","doi":"10.3389/fmech.2024.1360743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polyether–ether–ketone (PEEK) is a commonly employed biomaterial for spinal, cranial, and dental implant applications due to its mechanical properties, bio-stability, and radiolucency, especially when compared to metal alloys. However, its biologically inert behavior poses a substantial challenge in osseointegration between host bone and PEEK implants, resulting in implant loosening. Previous studies identified PEEK surface modification methods that prove beneficial in enhancing implant stability and supporting cell growth, but simultaneously, those modifications have the potential to promote bacterial attachment. In this study, sandblasting and sputter coating are performed to address the aforementioned issues as preclinical work. The aim is to investigate the effects of surface roughness through alumina sandblasting and a platinum (Pt) sputtered coating on the surface friction, cell viability, and bacterial adhesion rates of PEEK material. This study reveals that a higher average surface roughness of the PEEK sample (the highest was 1.2 μm obtained after sandblasting) increases the coefficient of friction, which was 0.25 compared to the untreated PEEK of 0.14, indicating better stability performance but also increased bacterial adhesion. A novelty of this study is that the method of Pt coating after alumina sandblasting is seen to significantly reduce the bacterial adhesion by 67% when compared to the sandblasted PEEK sample after 24 h immersion, implying better biocompatibility without changing the cell viability performance.","PeriodicalId":53220,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2024.1360743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polyether–ether–ketone (PEEK) is a commonly employed biomaterial for spinal, cranial, and dental implant applications due to its mechanical properties, bio-stability, and radiolucency, especially when compared to metal alloys. However, its biologically inert behavior poses a substantial challenge in osseointegration between host bone and PEEK implants, resulting in implant loosening. Previous studies identified PEEK surface modification methods that prove beneficial in enhancing implant stability and supporting cell growth, but simultaneously, those modifications have the potential to promote bacterial attachment. In this study, sandblasting and sputter coating are performed to address the aforementioned issues as preclinical work. The aim is to investigate the effects of surface roughness through alumina sandblasting and a platinum (Pt) sputtered coating on the surface friction, cell viability, and bacterial adhesion rates of PEEK material. This study reveals that a higher average surface roughness of the PEEK sample (the highest was 1.2 μm obtained after sandblasting) increases the coefficient of friction, which was 0.25 compared to the untreated PEEK of 0.14, indicating better stability performance but also increased bacterial adhesion. A novelty of this study is that the method of Pt coating after alumina sandblasting is seen to significantly reduce the bacterial adhesion by 67% when compared to the sandblasted PEEK sample after 24 h immersion, implying better biocompatibility without changing the cell viability performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过喷砂和铂涂层方法优化 PEEK 植入体表面,提高稳定性和生物相容性
聚醚醚酮(PEEK)因其机械性能、生物稳定性和放射性,尤其是与金属合金相比,是脊柱、颅骨和牙科植入物应用中常用的生物材料。然而,其生物惰性行为给宿主骨与 PEEK 植入体之间的骨结合带来了巨大挑战,导致植入体松动。以前的研究发现,PEEK 表面改性方法有利于提高种植体的稳定性和支持细胞生长,但同时,这些改性方法也有可能促进细菌附着。在本研究中,喷砂和溅射涂层作为临床前工作来解决上述问题。目的是研究氧化铝喷砂和铂(Pt)溅射涂层的表面粗糙度对 PEEK 材料的表面摩擦力、细胞存活率和细菌附着率的影响。研究发现,PEEK 样品的平均表面粗糙度越高(喷砂后的最高粗糙度为 1.2 μm),摩擦系数就越大,为 0.25,而未经处理的 PEEK 的摩擦系数为 0.14,这表明其稳定性能更好,同时也增加了细菌的粘附性。本研究的一个新发现是,与经过喷砂处理的 PEEK 样品相比,在氧化铝喷砂后进行铂涂层的方法可在浸泡 24 小时后将细菌附着力显著降低 67%,这意味着在不改变细胞存活性能的情况下具有更好的生物相容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Finite element analysis and automation of a medium scale grinder applied to the manufacture of cassava starch Editorial: Lightweight mechanical and aerospace structures and materials Analysis of the thickness of layered armor to provide protection against 7.62 mm ball projectiles using experimental and numerical methods Parameter fuzzy rectification for sliding mode control of five-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor speed control system Surrogate-based worst-case analysis of a knee joint model using Genetic Algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1