Assessment of Extraction Methods Effects on the Biological Activities (Antioxidant and Antiamylase) and Chemistry (Total Phenolics and Flavonoids) of Guazuma ulmifolia Leaves

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.35516/jjps.v17i1.1171
Nuri, Puspitasari Endah, Triatmoko Bawon, Dianasari Dewi, Muslichah Siti, Nugraha Arisatia
{"title":"Assessment of Extraction Methods Effects on the Biological Activities (Antioxidant and Antiamylase) and Chemistry (Total Phenolics and Flavonoids) of Guazuma ulmifolia Leaves","authors":"Nuri, Puspitasari Endah, Triatmoko Bawon, Dianasari Dewi, Muslichah Siti, Nugraha Arisatia","doi":"10.35516/jjps.v17i1.1171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The antioxidant activity was tested using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging method. Antiamylase activity was evaluated through a colorimetric assay that employs 3,5-dinitro salicylic acid (DNSA) as a substrate. Total phenolics and flavonoids content were quantified by the colorimetric method. The highest yield from the extraction of G. ulmifolia leaves was obtained from the water extract (9.64%). The infusion showed the most robust antioxidant and antiamylase activities (IC50 = 6.853 ± 0.504 µg/mL and 261.03 ± 6.83 µg/mL, respectively). The highest total phenolics and flavonoids content were found in the ethanolic extract, with 69.848 ± 1.871 mg GAE/g extract and 118.854 ± 1.001 mg QE/g extract respectively. Total phenolics and flavonoids content significantly influenced the antioxidant activity, but not the antiamylase activity. In conclusion, infusions were the best extraction method for obtaining high antiamylase activity, even though they did not yield the highest total phenolics and flavonoids content. Further research is needed to identify the compound in G. ulmifolia leaf infusions that contribute to antioxidant and antiamylase activities.","PeriodicalId":14719,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"40 s3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjps.v17i1.1171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The antioxidant activity was tested using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging method. Antiamylase activity was evaluated through a colorimetric assay that employs 3,5-dinitro salicylic acid (DNSA) as a substrate. Total phenolics and flavonoids content were quantified by the colorimetric method. The highest yield from the extraction of G. ulmifolia leaves was obtained from the water extract (9.64%). The infusion showed the most robust antioxidant and antiamylase activities (IC50 = 6.853 ± 0.504 µg/mL and 261.03 ± 6.83 µg/mL, respectively). The highest total phenolics and flavonoids content were found in the ethanolic extract, with 69.848 ± 1.871 mg GAE/g extract and 118.854 ± 1.001 mg QE/g extract respectively. Total phenolics and flavonoids content significantly influenced the antioxidant activity, but not the antiamylase activity. In conclusion, infusions were the best extraction method for obtaining high antiamylase activity, even though they did not yield the highest total phenolics and flavonoids content. Further research is needed to identify the compound in G. ulmifolia leaf infusions that contribute to antioxidant and antiamylase activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估萃取方法对瓜蒌叶生物活性(抗氧化和抗淀粉酶)和化学性质(总酚类和类黄酮)的影响
抗氧化活性采用 2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼(DPPH)清除法进行测试。抗淀粉酶活性是通过使用 3,5-二硝基水杨酸(DNSA)作为底物的比色法进行评估的。总酚和类黄酮含量采用比色法进行量化。从 G. ulmifolia 叶子中提取的最高产量来自水提取物(9.64%)。输液显示出最强的抗氧化和抗淀粉酶活性(IC50 = 6.853 ± 0.504 µg/mL 和 261.03 ± 6.83 µg/mL)。乙醇提取物中的总酚和类黄酮含量最高,分别为 69.848 ± 1.871 mg GAE/g 提取物和 118.854 ± 1.001 mg QE/g 提取物。总酚和类黄酮含量对抗氧化活性有显著影响,但对抗淀粉酶活性没有影响。总之,输液是获得高抗淀粉酶活性的最佳提取方法,尽管其总酚和类黄酮含量并不是最高的。还需要进一步研究,以确定 G. ulmifolia 叶浸泡液中有助于提高抗氧化和抗淀粉酶活性的化合物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (JJPS) is a scientific, bi-annual, peer-reviewed publication that will focus on current topics of interest to the pharmaceutical community at large. Although the JJPS is intended to be of interest to pharmaceutical scientists, other healthy workers, and manufacturing processors will also find it most interesting and informative. Papers will cover basic pharmaceutical and applied research, scientific commentaries, as well as views, reviews. Topics on products will include manufacturing process, quality control, pharmaceutical engineering, pharmaceutical technology, and philosophies on all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences. The editorial advisory board would like to place an emphasis on new and innovative methods, technologies, and techniques for the pharmaceutical industry. The reader will find a broad range of important topics in this first issue.
期刊最新文献
Recent Advances in Development of Vesicular Carrier for Transdermal Drug Delivery: A Review MMP-1 and MMP-7 Expression is Influenced by Ginsenosides in Mice Exposed to Aflatoxin B1: in vivo Study Optimizing Drug Delivery Vehicle with Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) - Based Excipient Selection A Review on Recent Advances of Natural Products as Larvicides in Vector Control Management Evaluation of the Impact of Orange Juice on Apixaban Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1