Self-assessment of the characteristics of nurses' work environment and psychometric analysis of the Slovene-language version of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI)

B. Skela-Savič, Allison Squires, Walter Sermeus, B. Lobe, Simon Dello, Mateja Bahun
{"title":"Self-assessment of the characteristics of nurses' work environment and psychometric analysis of the Slovene-language version of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI)","authors":"B. Skela-Savič, Allison Squires, Walter Sermeus, B. Lobe, Simon Dello, Mateja Bahun","doi":"10.14528/snr.2024.58.1.3212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Measures to improve nurses' work environments include ensuring adequate staffing levels, recognising the importance of nursing work, involving nurses in decision-making processes, and improving interprofessional communication. The aim of this study was to analyse the job characteristics reported by nurses and their association with the dimensions of clinical practice environments in hospitals.Methods: A cross-sectional explorative research design was employed. The Slovene-language version of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI(SI)) and data on nurses' job characteristics were used. A total of 1,010 nurses (403 general care nurses and 605 healthcare assistants) from ten Slovenian general hospitals participated in the study. Permission to conduct the research was granted by the Commission of the Republic of Slovenia for Medical Ethics.Results: The mean score of the PES-NWI(SI) was low (2.64), and the scale reliability was 0.937. The original theoretical five-factor structure was confirmed. The regression model explained the five factors in 26–47% of cases. The explanatory variables included opportunities for advancement, educational opportunities, professional status, satisfaction with current job and work environment, independence at work, and study leave.Discussion and conclusion: The study revealed managers' inadequate ability to ensure sufficient staffing, insufficient involvement of both respondents and managers in hospital affairs, and the lack of promotion opportunities. Creating an optimal work environment for nurses is an important task for managers and leaders. National healthcare policy must consider nurses as equal healthcare professionals and nursing as both a professional and scientific discipline.","PeriodicalId":32258,"journal":{"name":"Obzornik zdravstvene nege","volume":"53 40","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obzornik zdravstvene nege","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2024.58.1.3212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Measures to improve nurses' work environments include ensuring adequate staffing levels, recognising the importance of nursing work, involving nurses in decision-making processes, and improving interprofessional communication. The aim of this study was to analyse the job characteristics reported by nurses and their association with the dimensions of clinical practice environments in hospitals.Methods: A cross-sectional explorative research design was employed. The Slovene-language version of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI(SI)) and data on nurses' job characteristics were used. A total of 1,010 nurses (403 general care nurses and 605 healthcare assistants) from ten Slovenian general hospitals participated in the study. Permission to conduct the research was granted by the Commission of the Republic of Slovenia for Medical Ethics.Results: The mean score of the PES-NWI(SI) was low (2.64), and the scale reliability was 0.937. The original theoretical five-factor structure was confirmed. The regression model explained the five factors in 26–47% of cases. The explanatory variables included opportunities for advancement, educational opportunities, professional status, satisfaction with current job and work environment, independence at work, and study leave.Discussion and conclusion: The study revealed managers' inadequate ability to ensure sufficient staffing, insufficient involvement of both respondents and managers in hospital affairs, and the lack of promotion opportunities. Creating an optimal work environment for nurses is an important task for managers and leaders. National healthcare policy must consider nurses as equal healthcare professionals and nursing as both a professional and scientific discipline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士工作环境特点的自我评估和斯洛文尼亚语版护理工作指数实践环境量表(PES-NWI)的心理测量分析
导言:改善护士工作环境的措施包括确保充足的人员配备、承认护理工作的重要性、让护士参与决策过程以及改善专业间沟通。本研究旨在分析护士报告的工作特征及其与医院临床实践环境各方面的关联:方法:采用横断面探索性研究设计。采用斯洛文尼亚语版护理工作指数实践环境量表(PES-NWI(SI))和护士工作特征数据。共有来自斯洛文尼亚十家综合医院的 1,010 名护士(403 名普通护理护士和 605 名医护助理)参与了研究。斯洛文尼亚共和国医学伦理委员会批准了这项研究:PES-NWI(SI)的平均得分较低(2.64),量表信度为 0.937。最初的五因素理论结构得到了证实。回归模型对这五个因素的解释率为 26-47%。解释变量包括晋升机会、教育机会、职业地位、对当前工作和工作环境的满意度、工作独立性和学习假期:研究表明,管理人员没有足够的能力确保充足的人员编制,受访者和管理人员对医院事务的参与不足,以及缺乏晋升机会。为护士创造最佳工作环境是管理者和领导者的一项重要任务。国家医疗保健政策必须将护士视为平等的医疗保健专业人员,将护理学视为一门专业和科学学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Čustveno soočanje s posledicami življenjsko ogrožajočih zdravstvenih stanj Challenges to make patient engagement result in more sustainable pharmaceutical care Spolna zdravstvena pismenost slovenskih srednješolcev Vpliv porodnega položaja pri iztisu ploda na poškodbo presredka impact of an educational intervention on fertility awareness of healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1