The Causal Effects of a Trump Endorsement on Voter Preferences in a General Election Scenario

Scott Blatte, Danielle Piccoli, Matthew Zachem
{"title":"The Causal Effects of a Trump Endorsement on Voter Preferences in a General Election Scenario","authors":"Scott Blatte, Danielle Piccoli, Matthew Zachem","doi":"10.1017/s1049096524000064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Former President Trump’s persistent influence over Republican politics divides those who argue that he mobilizes otherwise apathetic voters against those contending he mobilizes Democrats at down-ballot Republicans’ expense. Scholars and pundits alike question whether policy still matters in the face of increasingly strong personas like the former president’s. Using a survey experiment, we find suggestive evidence that Trump’s endorsement in a general election reduces the likelihood of voting for a hypothetical Republican candidate. We also test the effect of policy stances and find evidence that Republican respondents value policy stances over an endorsement, but Democrats show no signs of prioritizing one more than the other. However, when shown a hypothetical candidate with unorthodox policy stances, the mere mention of a Trump endorsement leads members of both parties to demonstrate significant changes in the likelihood of voting for that candidate. Ultimately, we show that elite signals can attenuate support derived from policies.","PeriodicalId":515403,"journal":{"name":"PS: Political Science & Politics","volume":"34 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PS: Political Science & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096524000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Former President Trump’s persistent influence over Republican politics divides those who argue that he mobilizes otherwise apathetic voters against those contending he mobilizes Democrats at down-ballot Republicans’ expense. Scholars and pundits alike question whether policy still matters in the face of increasingly strong personas like the former president’s. Using a survey experiment, we find suggestive evidence that Trump’s endorsement in a general election reduces the likelihood of voting for a hypothetical Republican candidate. We also test the effect of policy stances and find evidence that Republican respondents value policy stances over an endorsement, but Democrats show no signs of prioritizing one more than the other. However, when shown a hypothetical candidate with unorthodox policy stances, the mere mention of a Trump endorsement leads members of both parties to demonstrate significant changes in the likelihood of voting for that candidate. Ultimately, we show that elite signals can attenuate support derived from policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大选情况下特朗普的支持对选民偏好的因果效应
前总统特朗普对共和党政治的持续影响使一些人产生了分歧,他们认为特朗普动员了原本冷漠的选民,而另一些人则认为特朗普动员了民主党人,牺牲了下层共和党人的利益。学者和专家们都质疑,面对像前总统这样越来越强势的角色,政策是否仍然重要。通过一项调查实验,我们发现有暗示性证据表明,特朗普在大选中的支持会降低投票给假定的共和党候选人的可能性。我们还测试了政策立场的影响,发现有证据表明,共和党受访者更看重政策立场而非背书,但民主党受访者并没有表现出更看重政策立场的迹象。然而,当假定的候选人具有非正统的政策立场时,只要提到特朗普的支持,两党成员投票支持该候选人的可能性就会发生显著变化。最终,我们表明精英信号会削弱来自政策的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surveying the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Political Science Education Citations to the Publications of Male and Female Political Scientists Revisited State Municipal Associations as Intermediaries in Service Learning Codes of Conduct at Political Science Conferences: Prevalence and Content Developing a Critical Understanding of Environmental Activism through Active Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1