Change my mind

Belinda Merkle, Hanna Bürkle, S. Janke, Karina Karst
{"title":"Change my mind","authors":"Belinda Merkle, Hanna Bürkle, S. Janke, Karina Karst","doi":"10.1024/1010-0652/a000379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: High dropout rates at universities, often caused by false expectations and a lack of motivation, pose a serious problem in higher education. Online self-assessments (OSAs) assess expectations regarding a field of study (major) and provide feedback on the reality of the major, thus pointing out expectation-reality discrepancies as well as helping prospective students choose a major. Based on cognitive dissonance theory, pointing out expectation-reality discrepancies should be related to changes in motivation for the major (expectancies for success, subjective values, intention to choose a major) and this relationship should be strengthened by feedback. Past research has shown that OSAs can correct expectations and that expectation-reality discrepancies are related to motivation but has not investigated the role of feedback for this process. Therefore, we extend past research by examining whether the positive relationships between expectation-reality discrepancies and changes in motivation for a major are stronger for prospective students who receive feedback on their expectation-reality discrepancies than for prospective students who do not receive feedback after the assessment. We conducted a field experiment in which 234 prospective students were randomly assigned to one of two groups (EG1 = OSA including feedback; EG2 = OSA without feedback). As hypothesized larger expectation-reality discrepancies were associated with larger changes in motivation for a major (expectancies for success, subjective values, intention to choose a major). Beyond that, we found a moderation effect of the feedback condition showing that the positive relationships between expectation-reality discrepancies and expectancies for success were stronger when prospective students received feedback (vs. no feedback). As feedback only showed effects beyond expectation-reality discrepancies in one of the considered outcomes, both the development of assessment and feedback should be targeted to optimize the effectiveness of OSAs.","PeriodicalId":267149,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: High dropout rates at universities, often caused by false expectations and a lack of motivation, pose a serious problem in higher education. Online self-assessments (OSAs) assess expectations regarding a field of study (major) and provide feedback on the reality of the major, thus pointing out expectation-reality discrepancies as well as helping prospective students choose a major. Based on cognitive dissonance theory, pointing out expectation-reality discrepancies should be related to changes in motivation for the major (expectancies for success, subjective values, intention to choose a major) and this relationship should be strengthened by feedback. Past research has shown that OSAs can correct expectations and that expectation-reality discrepancies are related to motivation but has not investigated the role of feedback for this process. Therefore, we extend past research by examining whether the positive relationships between expectation-reality discrepancies and changes in motivation for a major are stronger for prospective students who receive feedback on their expectation-reality discrepancies than for prospective students who do not receive feedback after the assessment. We conducted a field experiment in which 234 prospective students were randomly assigned to one of two groups (EG1 = OSA including feedback; EG2 = OSA without feedback). As hypothesized larger expectation-reality discrepancies were associated with larger changes in motivation for a major (expectancies for success, subjective values, intention to choose a major). Beyond that, we found a moderation effect of the feedback condition showing that the positive relationships between expectation-reality discrepancies and expectancies for success were stronger when prospective students received feedback (vs. no feedback). As feedback only showed effects beyond expectation-reality discrepancies in one of the considered outcomes, both the development of assessment and feedback should be targeted to optimize the effectiveness of OSAs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改变我的想法
摘要:大学的高辍学率往往是由错误的期望和缺乏动力造成的,这已成为高等教育中的一个严重问题。在线自我评估(OSA)可以评估学生对学习领域(专业)的期望,并对专业的现实情况提供反馈,从而指出期望与现实之间的差异,帮助未来的学生选择专业。根据认知失调理论,指出期望与现实之间的差异应与专业学习动机(成功期望、主观价值观、专业选择意向)的变化有关,这种关系应通过反馈得到加强。过去的研究表明,开放源码软件可以纠正期望,而期望与现实之间的差异与学习动机有关,但没有研究反馈在这一过程中的作用。因此,我们对过去的研究进行了延伸,研究了在评估后获得期望-现实差异反馈的准大学生与未获得反馈的准大学生相比,期望-现实差异与专业学习动机变化之间的正相关关系是否更强。我们进行了一项现场实验,将 234 名准大学生随机分配到两组中的一组(EG1 = 含反馈的开放式自评;EG2 = 不含反馈的开放式自评)。正如假设的那样,期望-现实差异越大,专业动机(成功期望、主观价值观、专业选择意向)的变化就越大。除此之外,我们还发现了反馈条件的调节效应,即当未来学生收到反馈(与未收到反馈相比)时,期望-现实差异与成功期望之间的正相关关系更强。由于反馈仅在其中一项结果中显示出超越期望-现实差异的效果,因此应同时针对评估和反馈进行开发,以优化 OSA 的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vermittelt Lehrkraftfeedback den Zusammenhang von Verhaltensproblemen und sozialer Akzeptanz in der Primarstufe? Intelligenzmessung in drei Minuten – Evaluation des mini-q und Konstruktion einer Parallelversion Evaluation von Online Self-Assessments zur Studienwahl – Hindernisse, Chancen und Praxisbeispiele „Wir wollen mitreden!“ – Entwicklung und Validierung von Skalen zur Erfassung motivationaler Regulation bei der Teilnahme an Befragungen zur Evaluation des Studiums (SMR-Eval) Zum Zusammenhang zwischen Resilienz, Selbstwirksamkeit und Sozialbeziehung in Familie und Schule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1