Successful Life Conduct in Very Old Age: Theoretical Implications and Empirical Support from a Population-Based Study

IF 2.8 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Applied Research in Quality of Life Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI:10.1007/s11482-024-10301-4
Roman Kaspar, Andrea Albrecht, Thomas Brijoux, Jonas Fey, Luise Geithner, Veronica Oswald, Marcella Reissmann, Michael Wagner, Judith Wenner, Susanne Zank, Jaroslava Zimmermann
{"title":"Successful Life Conduct in Very Old Age: Theoretical Implications and Empirical Support from a Population-Based Study","authors":"Roman Kaspar,&nbsp;Andrea Albrecht,&nbsp;Thomas Brijoux,&nbsp;Jonas Fey,&nbsp;Luise Geithner,&nbsp;Veronica Oswald,&nbsp;Marcella Reissmann,&nbsp;Michael Wagner,&nbsp;Judith Wenner,&nbsp;Susanne Zank,&nbsp;Jaroslava Zimmermann","doi":"10.1007/s11482-024-10301-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social survey data on those aged 80 years or older is sparse. Based on a representative sample, this paper validates a multidimensional model proposed for understanding of quality of life (QoL) in very old age. Towards this goal, this paper estimated levels and heterogeneity of personal and environmental resources, well-being, autonomy, and perceived appreciation by society in the population of the very old in Germany. Next, the contribution of personal and environmental resources to QoL outcomes and overlap between these outcomes was estimated using a multivariate approach. Results were based on a representative survey on QoL of the very old in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany’s most populous state. The survey included comprehensive information on socio-demographics, health, social and personal QoL resources including objective testing of cognitive function. The sample comprised 1,863 individuals (mean age 86.5 years, range 80–102 years), including 211 individuals residing in non-private dwellings. Interviews with proxy informants were conducted for 176 individuals that were willing to participate but could not conduct the interview themselves due to limited ability to communicate (PLC). Pronounced differences were found for PLC with respect to environmental and personal resources and QoL outcomes. Pronounced differences were also found both with respect to lower observed levels of QoL outcomes (e.g., autonomy) and predictors of QoL outcomes (e.g., effect of negative “external” appreciation on subjective well-being). Contrary to the deficit-oriented model of old age, a high degree of autonomy was observed. However, substantial and consequential negative “external” appreciation of very old age was also apparent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51483,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","volume":"19 4","pages":"1 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11482-024-10301-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11482-024-10301-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social survey data on those aged 80 years or older is sparse. Based on a representative sample, this paper validates a multidimensional model proposed for understanding of quality of life (QoL) in very old age. Towards this goal, this paper estimated levels and heterogeneity of personal and environmental resources, well-being, autonomy, and perceived appreciation by society in the population of the very old in Germany. Next, the contribution of personal and environmental resources to QoL outcomes and overlap between these outcomes was estimated using a multivariate approach. Results were based on a representative survey on QoL of the very old in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany’s most populous state. The survey included comprehensive information on socio-demographics, health, social and personal QoL resources including objective testing of cognitive function. The sample comprised 1,863 individuals (mean age 86.5 years, range 80–102 years), including 211 individuals residing in non-private dwellings. Interviews with proxy informants were conducted for 176 individuals that were willing to participate but could not conduct the interview themselves due to limited ability to communicate (PLC). Pronounced differences were found for PLC with respect to environmental and personal resources and QoL outcomes. Pronounced differences were also found both with respect to lower observed levels of QoL outcomes (e.g., autonomy) and predictors of QoL outcomes (e.g., effect of negative “external” appreciation on subjective well-being). Contrary to the deficit-oriented model of old age, a high degree of autonomy was observed. However, substantial and consequential negative “external” appreciation of very old age was also apparent.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高龄老人的成功生活行为:一项基于人口的研究的理论意义和经验支持
有关 80 岁或以上老年人的社会调查数据很少。本文基于一个具有代表性的样本,验证了为了解高龄老人生活质量(QoL)而提出的多维模型。为此,本文估算了德国高龄人口的个人和环境资源、幸福感、自主性和社会赞赏感的水平和异质性。然后,采用多元方法估算了个人和环境资源对 QoL 结果的贡献以及这些结果之间的重叠。研究结果基于对德国人口最多的北莱茵-威斯特法伦州高龄老人生活质量的代表性调查。调查内容包括社会人口统计学、健康、社会和个人 QoL 资源(包括认知功能的客观测试)等综合信息。样本包括 1863 人(平均年龄为 86.5 岁,范围为 80-102 岁),其中 211 人居住在非私人住宅中。对 176 名愿意参与但因沟通能力有限(PLC)而无法亲自进行访谈的人进行了代理信息提供者访谈。结果发现,PLC 在环境和个人资源以及 QoL 结果方面存在明显差异。此外,在观察到的较低水平的 QoL 结果(如自主性)和 QoL 结果的预测因素(如负面 "外部 "评价对主观幸福感的影响)方面,也发现了明显的差异。与以赤字为导向的老年模式相反,我们观察到了高度的自主性。然而,对高龄老人的 "外部 "负面评价也很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Research in Quality of Life
Applied Research in Quality of Life SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to publish conceptual, methodological and empirical papers dealing with quality-of-life studies in the applied areas of the natural and social sciences. As the official journal of the ISQOLS, it is designed to attract papers that have direct implications for, or impact on practical applications of research on the quality-of-life. We welcome papers crafted from interdisciplinary, inter-professional and international perspectives. This research should guide decision making in a variety of professions, industries, nonprofit, and government sectors, including healthcare, travel and tourism, marketing, corporate management, community planning, social work, public administration, and human resource management. The goal is to help decision makers apply performance measures and outcome assessment techniques based on concepts such as well-being, human satisfaction, human development, happiness, wellness and quality-of-life. The Editorial Review Board is divided into specific sections indicating the broad scope of practice covered by the journal. The section editors are distinguished scholars from many countries across the globe.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Longitudinal Associations between Cyberbullying Victimization and Cognitive and Affective Components of Subjective Well-Being in Adolescents: A Network Analysis Correction: Care Planning in Ageing Families During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Social Unrest in Hong Kong Housing Tenure and Subjective Wellbeing: The Importance of Public Housing “Withdrawal Syndrome”: The Effects of Acts of Microaggression in the Classroom on Racialized Students Parental Aggravation, Parenting Behaviors, Child Self-Control and Externalizing Problems in Singapore: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1