E-learning Quality Assessment Indicators: A Narrative Review

Sadeghi F, Fazaeli S, Kimiafar Kh, Ameri F, Meraji M
{"title":"E-learning Quality Assessment Indicators: A Narrative Review","authors":"Sadeghi F, Fazaeli S, Kimiafar Kh, Ameri F, Meraji M","doi":"10.18502/jmed.v18i4.15178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Due to the widespread use of this educational method in the universities of the world and Iran, there is a need to evaluate its quality using indicators and approaches. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the quality evaluation indicators of electronic education. \nMethod: The present study was conducted according to the guidelines of PRISMA. For this purpose, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Mogiran, Irandak and SID databases were searched in the period from 2018 to 2022. The search strategy included the concepts of \"e-learning\", \"index\" and \"medical science students\". The criteria for entering this study were original articles in Persian and English. After selecting the studies, data collection was done based on the data extraction form. \nResults: A total of 77 articles were included in this review. From the review of studies, 37 indicators in 6 categories of factors related to students (5 indicators), factors related to professors (11 indicators), factors related to educational content (5 indicators), factors related to required facilities (7 indicators), factors related to Management (5 indicators) and factors related to laws and regulations (4 indicators) were obtained. \nConclusion: The results showed that six factors are involved in evaluating the quality of e-learning. Therefore, it is recommended that the managers of the educational systems to ensure the provision of high-quality training by identifying the weaknesses of the electronic learning software system and laying the foundation for their elimination.","PeriodicalId":30509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmed.v18i4.15178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the widespread use of this educational method in the universities of the world and Iran, there is a need to evaluate its quality using indicators and approaches. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the quality evaluation indicators of electronic education. Method: The present study was conducted according to the guidelines of PRISMA. For this purpose, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Mogiran, Irandak and SID databases were searched in the period from 2018 to 2022. The search strategy included the concepts of "e-learning", "index" and "medical science students". The criteria for entering this study were original articles in Persian and English. After selecting the studies, data collection was done based on the data extraction form. Results: A total of 77 articles were included in this review. From the review of studies, 37 indicators in 6 categories of factors related to students (5 indicators), factors related to professors (11 indicators), factors related to educational content (5 indicators), factors related to required facilities (7 indicators), factors related to Management (5 indicators) and factors related to laws and regulations (4 indicators) were obtained. Conclusion: The results showed that six factors are involved in evaluating the quality of e-learning. Therefore, it is recommended that the managers of the educational systems to ensure the provision of high-quality training by identifying the weaknesses of the electronic learning software system and laying the foundation for their elimination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子学习质量评估指标:叙述性评论
导言:由于这种教育方法在世界和伊朗的大学中被广泛使用,因此有必要使用指标和方法对其质量进行评估。因此,本研究旨在评估电子教育的质量评价指标。方法:本研究根据 PRISMA 准则进行。为此,检索了 2018 年至 2022 年期间的 Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus、Mogiran、Irandak 和 SID 数据库。检索策略包括 "电子学习"、"索引 "和 "医科学生 "等概念。本研究的入选标准是波斯语和英语的原创文章。选定研究后,根据数据提取表进行数据收集。结果:共有 77 篇文章被纳入本综述。从研究综述中获得了与学生有关的因素(5 项指标)、与教授有关的因素(11 项指标)、与教育内容有关的因素(5 项指标)、与所需设施有关的因素(7 项指标)、与管理有关的因素(5 项指标)以及与法律法规有关的因素(4 项指标)等 6 类 37 项指标。结论结果表明,评价电子学习质量涉及六个因素。因此,建议教育系统的管理者通过找出电子学习软件系统的薄弱环节,为消除这些薄弱环节奠定基础,从而确保提供高质量的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Game-Based Learning for Soft Skills Using the Peer Learning Method in the E-learning Process: Creating a Support-Motivational Mechanism for the Parasitology MS Students in Shahid Sadougi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd E-learning Quality Assessment Indicators: A Narrative Review ChatGPT in writing scientific articles: friend or foe? Explaining Medical Students' Experiences of the Challenges of Clinical Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Qualitative Content Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1