Barbed suture related small bowel obstruction in bariatric surgery: a case series

Kirra G. Parks, Nicholas E. Williams
{"title":"Barbed suture related small bowel obstruction in bariatric surgery: a case series","authors":"Kirra G. Parks, Nicholas E. Williams","doi":"10.18203/2349-2902.isj20240683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bariatric surgeries are amongst the most commonly performed yet technically demanding laparoscopic procedures in Australia. The use of barbed suture has been widely adopted for use in gastric bypass surgeries to avoid the need for intracorporeal knot tying while maintaining tension and improving surgical efficiency. Whilst barbed suture has been reported as safe with similar outcomes to traditional suture use in bariatric surgery there is a risk that the barbs on the tail of the suture can grasp other tissues and form band adhesions resulting in small bowel obstruction (SBO). We present a series of four cases of barbed suture related SBO post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. In all four patients the SBO was caused by a band adhesion related to the tail of the non-absorbable (permanent) barbed suture used to close the mesenteric defect adjacent to the jejunojejunostomy. The time to presentation with SBO ranged from 1 day to 20 months post RYGB and all patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy where the adhesion was divided and the tail of the suture trimmed. To avoid this uncommon complication, we recommend the use of absorbable barbed suture with two extra passes beyond the completion of the suture line and the tail cut almost flush with the tissue. Further data is needed to determine if the recommended modified technique still poses a risk of SBO or if use of absorbable suture to close the mesenteric defect increases the risk of internal hernia.","PeriodicalId":14372,"journal":{"name":"International Surgery Journal","volume":"77 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20240683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bariatric surgeries are amongst the most commonly performed yet technically demanding laparoscopic procedures in Australia. The use of barbed suture has been widely adopted for use in gastric bypass surgeries to avoid the need for intracorporeal knot tying while maintaining tension and improving surgical efficiency. Whilst barbed suture has been reported as safe with similar outcomes to traditional suture use in bariatric surgery there is a risk that the barbs on the tail of the suture can grasp other tissues and form band adhesions resulting in small bowel obstruction (SBO). We present a series of four cases of barbed suture related SBO post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. In all four patients the SBO was caused by a band adhesion related to the tail of the non-absorbable (permanent) barbed suture used to close the mesenteric defect adjacent to the jejunojejunostomy. The time to presentation with SBO ranged from 1 day to 20 months post RYGB and all patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy where the adhesion was divided and the tail of the suture trimmed. To avoid this uncommon complication, we recommend the use of absorbable barbed suture with two extra passes beyond the completion of the suture line and the tail cut almost flush with the tissue. Further data is needed to determine if the recommended modified technique still poses a risk of SBO or if use of absorbable suture to close the mesenteric defect increases the risk of internal hernia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减肥手术中与倒刺缝合相关的小肠梗阻:病例系列
减肥手术是澳大利亚最常见但技术要求最高的腹腔镜手术之一。在胃旁路手术中广泛采用倒钩缝合线,以避免体外打结,同时保持张力并提高手术效率。据报道,在减肥手术中使用倒钩缝合线的安全性与传统缝合线相似,但缝合线尾部的倒钩有可能抓住其他组织,形成带状粘连,导致小肠梗阻(SBO)。我们介绍了四例鲁-恩-Y 胃旁路(RYGB)手术后与倒钩缝线相关的 SBO 病例。所有四名患者的 SBO 都是由用于缝合空肠空肠吻合术附近肠系膜缺损的不可吸收(永久性)倒钩缝线尾部的带状粘连引起的。所有患者都接受了诊断性腹腔镜手术,在手术中分离了粘连并修剪了缝线尾部。为避免这种不常见的并发症,我们建议使用可吸收的倒钩缝合线,在缝合线完成后再多缝合两针,并将缝线尾部几乎与组织齐平。我们还需要进一步的数据来确定所推荐的改良技术是否仍有发生 SBO 的风险,或者使用可吸收缝线缝合肠系膜缺损是否会增加内疝的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Congenital hepatic hemangioma: a review Pelvic congestion syndrome and its treatment: topic review Giant pancreatic cyst with extension to spleen managed by laparoscopy Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma, a rare mimic and important differential of iliopsoas abscess Cerebrospinal fluid shunt catheter extrusion through the mouth in a child: a case report with brief literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1