COMPARATIVE STUDY ON NEUROCOGNITIVE DEFICITS IN PATIENTS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA AND BIPOLAR AFFECTIVE DISORDER

Bodliya Mayuresh, Jain Konika, Rathore Siddharth
{"title":"COMPARATIVE STUDY ON NEUROCOGNITIVE DEFICITS IN PATIENTS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA AND BIPOLAR AFFECTIVE DISORDER","authors":"Bodliya Mayuresh, Jain Konika, Rathore Siddharth","doi":"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i2.4041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Cognitive impairments are central features of schizophrenia and are related to functional status and other aspects of the illness. Aim of this study is to assess and compare neurocognitive impairment in schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder patients. \nMethods: It was a comparative study. 50 consecutive patients of schizophrenia and 50 consecutive patients of bipolar affective disorder were included. We used PANSS for schizophrenia patients and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and Young Mania Rating scale (YMRS) were administered for bipolar patients. Neuropsychological testing was used to compare the cognitive impairment of schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder. \nResults: The mean age of schizophrenic patients was 37 y and the mean age of BPAD patients was 37.32 y The COWT mean score for schizophrenic patients was 6.98(SD±1.84) and for BPAD patients was 8.44(SD±2.61). The score for schizophrenic patients was-21.21(SD±8.83) and for BPAD patients was-25.43(SD±9.34). The score for schizophrenic patients was 27.10(SD±1.26) and for BPAD patients was 27.52(SD±1.43). \nConclusion: Compared to bipolar patients, patients with schizophrenia had more cognitive dysfunction. Timely assessment and treatment of cognitive dysfunction should be part of standard management protocols in both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.","PeriodicalId":13875,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i2.4041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive impairments are central features of schizophrenia and are related to functional status and other aspects of the illness. Aim of this study is to assess and compare neurocognitive impairment in schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder patients. Methods: It was a comparative study. 50 consecutive patients of schizophrenia and 50 consecutive patients of bipolar affective disorder were included. We used PANSS for schizophrenia patients and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and Young Mania Rating scale (YMRS) were administered for bipolar patients. Neuropsychological testing was used to compare the cognitive impairment of schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder. Results: The mean age of schizophrenic patients was 37 y and the mean age of BPAD patients was 37.32 y The COWT mean score for schizophrenic patients was 6.98(SD±1.84) and for BPAD patients was 8.44(SD±2.61). The score for schizophrenic patients was-21.21(SD±8.83) and for BPAD patients was-25.43(SD±9.34). The score for schizophrenic patients was 27.10(SD±1.26) and for BPAD patients was 27.52(SD±1.43). Conclusion: Compared to bipolar patients, patients with schizophrenia had more cognitive dysfunction. Timely assessment and treatment of cognitive dysfunction should be part of standard management protocols in both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者神经认知缺陷的比较研究
目的:认知障碍是精神分裂症的核心特征,与功能状态和疾病的其他方面有关。本研究旨在评估和比较精神分裂症患者和双相情感障碍患者的神经认知功能障碍。研究方法这是一项比较研究。连续纳入 50 名精神分裂症患者和 50 名双相情感障碍患者。精神分裂症患者使用 PANSS,双相情感障碍患者使用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HRSD)和青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)。我们使用神经心理学测试来比较精神分裂症和躁狂症患者的认知障碍。结果显示精神分裂症患者的 COWT 平均得分为 6.98(SD±1.84)分,双相情感障碍患者的 COWT 平均得分为 8.44(SD±2.61)分。精神分裂症患者的评分为 21.21(SD±8.83)分,BPAD 患者的评分为 25.43(SD±9.34)分。精神分裂症患者的得分为 27.10(SD±1.26)分,BPAD 患者的得分为 27.52(SD±1.43)分。结论与双相情感障碍患者相比,精神分裂症患者的认知功能障碍程度更高。及时评估和治疗认知功能障碍应成为精神分裂症和躁狂症标准治疗方案的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY STUDY OF PREVALENCE OF POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME AMONG ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT STUDENTS OF NAVODAYA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS PREVALENCE OF KELL BLOOD GROUP SYSTEM IN BLOOD DONORS ATTENDING A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN NORTHWESTERN INDIA APPLICATION OF VALIDATED RP-HPLC METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF METAXALONE AND DICLOFENAC POTASSIUM IN PLASMA MORPHOMETRIC VARIATION OF FORAMEN OVALE IN DRY ADULT SKULL OF INDIAN POPULATION WITH CLINICAL CORRELATIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1