Exploring Antibiotic Self Medication Patterns: A Cross-Sectional Study among Patients in Multiple Hospitals

Aswad Shahid, Mahrukh Nazeer, Aqdas Adeel Khan, Ghulam Murtaza, Ali Hamza, Hafiza Rakhshan Urooj, Muhammad Usama
{"title":"Exploring Antibiotic Self Medication Patterns: A Cross-Sectional Study among Patients in Multiple Hospitals","authors":"Aswad Shahid, Mahrukh Nazeer, Aqdas Adeel Khan, Ghulam Murtaza, Ali Hamza, Hafiza Rakhshan Urooj, Muhammad Usama","doi":"10.47941/ijhmnp.1729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore the multifaceted impact of self-medication with antibiotics, delving into its implications for public health. The potential repercussions of self-medication extend beyond individual well-being. This study investigates the broader consequences, including the wastage of crucial healthcare resources, the development of antibiotic resistance, adverse reactions, delays in seeking appropriate medical care, and the exacerbation of common illnesses. By understanding the complexities surrounding self-medication, particularly with antibiotics, we aim to contribute valuable insights to inform public health strategies, medical interventions, and educational campaigns. \nThe research seeks to identify patterns, motivations, and behaviors associated with self-medication, shedding light on the factors that drive individuals to bypass professional medical advice. With a focus on antibiotics, a class of drugs critical for treating bacterial infections, the study aims to highlight the potential risks and challenges posed by unsupervised antibiotic use. \nMethodology: This cross-sectional study, conducted from September 13 to September 25, 2022, investigates self-medication with antibiotics among 300 patients from five hospitals. Employing a confidential 20-question questionnaire administered through face-to-face interviews, the research aims to understand prevalence and patterns of self-medication. Quantitative data analysis utilizes parametric Z-tests through SPSS Software (version 21). Ethical considerations include obtaining approval, ensuring informed consent, and maintaining confidentiality. Limitations include potential selection and recall bias associated with convenience sampling and self-reported data, respectively. \nFindings: Among the 300 participants, 47% were male, and 53% were female. The majority were adults aged between 20 to 40 years, with 64% from Rawalpindi. Over 50% of participants had matriculation or higher education. Ninety-seven percent of people had used antibiotics at least once in their life, with 63% practicing self-medication. Notably, 49% self-medicated 1-5 times in the past year. The primary reasons for self-medication included convenience (47%), personal experience (34%), and previous doctor's prescriptions (32%). Only 36% completed the prescribed antibiotic course. A significant percentage (71%) never changed the dosage of antibiotics, while 22% sometimes altered the dosage. Switching antibiotics during the course occurred in 21% of cases, primarily because the initial treatment was ineffective. Additionally, 51% of participants believed they could successfully treat common infections with antibiotics. Most participants (63%) stopped taking antibiotics if they experienced side effects during the course. A majority (62%) did not complete the antibiotic course after early symptom relief. Regarding dosage, 74% of participants believed that larger antibiotic doses did not guarantee quicker action. Furthermore, 36% of participants occasionally gave prescribed antibiotics to sick family members, and 10% always did. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: This research significantly advances our understanding of antibiotic self-medication across theoretical, policy, and practical dimensions. The study intricately explores the prevalence and nuanced patterns characterizing patients' self-medication behaviors with antibiotics, thereby contributing to the refinement of existing theoretical frameworks in healthcare behavior. The comprehensive insights gained from this research provide a foundation for a more sophisticated understanding of the intricate interplay of factors influencing patients' decisions regarding antibiotic use. This understanding enables the formulation of targeted policies aimed at mitigating the potential risks associated with unsupervised antibiotic use, contributing to broader public health initiatives combating antibiotic resistance and ensuring the well-being of communities.","PeriodicalId":441176,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice","volume":"93 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhmnp.1729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore the multifaceted impact of self-medication with antibiotics, delving into its implications for public health. The potential repercussions of self-medication extend beyond individual well-being. This study investigates the broader consequences, including the wastage of crucial healthcare resources, the development of antibiotic resistance, adverse reactions, delays in seeking appropriate medical care, and the exacerbation of common illnesses. By understanding the complexities surrounding self-medication, particularly with antibiotics, we aim to contribute valuable insights to inform public health strategies, medical interventions, and educational campaigns. The research seeks to identify patterns, motivations, and behaviors associated with self-medication, shedding light on the factors that drive individuals to bypass professional medical advice. With a focus on antibiotics, a class of drugs critical for treating bacterial infections, the study aims to highlight the potential risks and challenges posed by unsupervised antibiotic use. Methodology: This cross-sectional study, conducted from September 13 to September 25, 2022, investigates self-medication with antibiotics among 300 patients from five hospitals. Employing a confidential 20-question questionnaire administered through face-to-face interviews, the research aims to understand prevalence and patterns of self-medication. Quantitative data analysis utilizes parametric Z-tests through SPSS Software (version 21). Ethical considerations include obtaining approval, ensuring informed consent, and maintaining confidentiality. Limitations include potential selection and recall bias associated with convenience sampling and self-reported data, respectively. Findings: Among the 300 participants, 47% were male, and 53% were female. The majority were adults aged between 20 to 40 years, with 64% from Rawalpindi. Over 50% of participants had matriculation or higher education. Ninety-seven percent of people had used antibiotics at least once in their life, with 63% practicing self-medication. Notably, 49% self-medicated 1-5 times in the past year. The primary reasons for self-medication included convenience (47%), personal experience (34%), and previous doctor's prescriptions (32%). Only 36% completed the prescribed antibiotic course. A significant percentage (71%) never changed the dosage of antibiotics, while 22% sometimes altered the dosage. Switching antibiotics during the course occurred in 21% of cases, primarily because the initial treatment was ineffective. Additionally, 51% of participants believed they could successfully treat common infections with antibiotics. Most participants (63%) stopped taking antibiotics if they experienced side effects during the course. A majority (62%) did not complete the antibiotic course after early symptom relief. Regarding dosage, 74% of participants believed that larger antibiotic doses did not guarantee quicker action. Furthermore, 36% of participants occasionally gave prescribed antibiotics to sick family members, and 10% always did. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: This research significantly advances our understanding of antibiotic self-medication across theoretical, policy, and practical dimensions. The study intricately explores the prevalence and nuanced patterns characterizing patients' self-medication behaviors with antibiotics, thereby contributing to the refinement of existing theoretical frameworks in healthcare behavior. The comprehensive insights gained from this research provide a foundation for a more sophisticated understanding of the intricate interplay of factors influencing patients' decisions regarding antibiotic use. This understanding enables the formulation of targeted policies aimed at mitigating the potential risks associated with unsupervised antibiotic use, contributing to broader public health initiatives combating antibiotic resistance and ensuring the well-being of communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索抗生素自我用药模式:多所医院患者的横断面研究
目的:本研究旨在探讨抗生素自我药疗的多方面影响,深入探讨其对公共卫生的影响。自我药疗的潜在影响超出了个人福祉的范围。本研究调查了更广泛的后果,包括关键医疗资源的浪费、抗生素耐药性的产生、不良反应、寻求适当医疗护理的延迟以及常见疾病的恶化。通过了解自我药疗(尤其是抗生素)的复杂性,我们希望为公共卫生战略、医疗干预和教育活动提供有价值的见解。研究旨在确定与自我药疗相关的模式、动机和行为,揭示促使人们绕过专业医疗建议的因素。抗生素是治疗细菌感染的一类关键药物,本研究以抗生素为重点,旨在强调在无人监督的情况下使用抗生素所带来的潜在风险和挑战。研究方法这项横断面研究于 2022 年 9 月 13 日至 9 月 25 日进行,调查了来自五家医院的 300 名患者的抗生素自我用药情况。研究采用保密的 20 个问题的问卷,通过面对面访谈的方式进行,旨在了解自我用药的流行程度和模式。定量数据分析通过 SPSS 软件(21 版)进行参数 Z 检验。伦理方面的考虑包括获得批准、确保知情同意和保密。局限性包括与方便抽样和自我报告数据相关的潜在选择偏差和回忆偏差。研究结果在 300 名参与者中,47% 为男性,53% 为女性。大多数参与者为 20 至 40 岁的成年人,其中 64% 来自拉瓦尔品第。50%以上的参与者受过大学预科或高等教育。97%的人一生中至少使用过一次抗生素,63%的人有自我药疗的习惯。值得注意的是,49% 的人在过去一年中自行用药 1-5 次。自行用药的主要原因包括方便(47%)、个人经验(34%)和以前的医生处方(32%)。只有 36% 的人完成了规定的抗生素疗程。很大一部分人(71%)从未改变过抗生素的剂量,而 22% 的人有时会改变剂量。在疗程中更换抗生素的情况占 21%,主要是因为最初的治疗无效。此外,51% 的参与者认为他们可以成功地用抗生素治疗普通感染。大多数参与者(63%)在疗程中出现副作用时会停止服用抗生素。大多数人(62%)在早期症状缓解后没有完成抗生素疗程。在剂量方面,74% 的参与者认为较大剂量的抗生素并不能保证更快起效。此外,36% 的参与者偶尔会给生病的家人服用处方抗生素,10% 的参与者总是这样做。对理论、政策和实践的独特贡献:这项研究极大地促进了我们对抗生素自我药疗在理论、政策和实践方面的理解。该研究深入探讨了患者使用抗生素自我用药行为的普遍性和细微模式,从而有助于完善现有的医疗保健行为理论框架。这项研究获得的全面见解为我们更深入地了解影响患者抗生素使用决策的各种因素之间错综复杂的相互作用奠定了基础。有了这种认识,就能制定有针对性的政策,以降低在无人监督的情况下使用抗生素所带来的潜在风险,从而推动更广泛的公共卫生行动,消除抗生素耐药性,确保社区的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between APOL 1 Risk Genotypes and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy among Sub-Saharan Africans in Trypanosoma Brucei Gambiense Endemic Rural Area Assessment of the Level of Adherence to Hazardous Waste Management Policy Frameworks among Health Workers in Private Hospitals in Nairobi County - Kenya Determination of Gestational Age using Crown-Rump Length and its Associated Maternal Correlates in Igbos Living in Nnewi: An Ultrasound Study. Exploring Antibiotic Self Medication Patterns: A Cross-Sectional Study among Patients in Multiple Hospitals APOL 1 Risk Genotype is associated with Albuminuria in Sub-Saharan African without Hypertension: A Case Study of Trypanosoma Brucei Gambiense Endemic Area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1