An ethics framework for the transition to an operational learning healthcare system

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Learning Health Systems Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1002/lrh2.10414
Marieke J Hollestelle, Rieke van der Graaf, Miriam CJM Sturkenboom, Johannes JM van Delden
{"title":"An ethics framework for the transition to an operational learning healthcare system","authors":"Marieke J Hollestelle,&nbsp;Rieke van der Graaf,&nbsp;Miriam CJM Sturkenboom,&nbsp;Johannes JM van Delden","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.10414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>While Learning Healthcare Systems (LHSs) have received increasing attention in health care and research, the amount of operational LHSs remains limited. Given the investment of resources in these projects, a moral responsibility to pursue the transition toward an LHS falls on projects and their participating stakeholders. This paper provides an ethics framework for projects that have taken steps toward building an LHS and are in the position to transition to an operational LHS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>To articulate relevant ethical requirements, we analyze established ethics frameworks in the fields of LHSs, data-intensive health research, and transitioning or innovating health systems. The overlapping content and shared values are used to articulate overarching ethical requirements. To provide necessary context, we apply the insights from the analysis to the Innovative Medicines Initiative ConcePTION project. This project is specifically designed to generate knowledge on the safety of medications used during pregnancy and lactation through the establishment of an LHS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Upon analyzing the consulted frameworks, we identified four overlapping ethical requirements that are also of significant relevance within the scope of our ethics framework. These requirements are: (1) public benefit and favorable harm–benefit ratio; (2) equity and justice; (3) stakeholder engagement; and (4) sustainability. Additionally, we apply these ethical requirements to the context of an LHS for pregnant and lactating people.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although tailored to the context of pregnancy and lactation, our ethics framework can provide guidance for the transition to an operational LHS across diverse healthcare domains.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.10414","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

While Learning Healthcare Systems (LHSs) have received increasing attention in health care and research, the amount of operational LHSs remains limited. Given the investment of resources in these projects, a moral responsibility to pursue the transition toward an LHS falls on projects and their participating stakeholders. This paper provides an ethics framework for projects that have taken steps toward building an LHS and are in the position to transition to an operational LHS.

Method

To articulate relevant ethical requirements, we analyze established ethics frameworks in the fields of LHSs, data-intensive health research, and transitioning or innovating health systems. The overlapping content and shared values are used to articulate overarching ethical requirements. To provide necessary context, we apply the insights from the analysis to the Innovative Medicines Initiative ConcePTION project. This project is specifically designed to generate knowledge on the safety of medications used during pregnancy and lactation through the establishment of an LHS.

Results

Upon analyzing the consulted frameworks, we identified four overlapping ethical requirements that are also of significant relevance within the scope of our ethics framework. These requirements are: (1) public benefit and favorable harm–benefit ratio; (2) equity and justice; (3) stakeholder engagement; and (4) sustainability. Additionally, we apply these ethical requirements to the context of an LHS for pregnant and lactating people.

Conclusion

Although tailored to the context of pregnancy and lactation, our ethics framework can provide guidance for the transition to an operational LHS across diverse healthcare domains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向可操作的学习型医疗保健系统过渡的伦理框架
尽管学习型医疗保健系统(LHS)在医疗保健和研究领域受到越来越多的关注,但实际运行的 LHS 数量仍然有限。考虑到这些项目的资源投入,项目及其参与的利益相关者有道义上的责任向 LHS 过渡。为了阐明相关的伦理要求,我们分析了长效医疗系统、数据密集型健康研究、转型或创新型医疗系统等领域已有的伦理框架。重叠的内容和共同的价值观被用来阐述总体伦理要求。为了提供必要的背景,我们将分析得出的见解应用于创新药物倡议 ConcePTION 项目。该项目旨在通过建立生命健康系统,了解妊娠期和哺乳期用药的安全性。在对所咨询的框架进行分析后,我们确定了四项重叠的伦理要求,这些要求在我们的伦理框架范围内也具有重要意义。这些要求是(1) 公共利益和有利的损益比;(2) 公平与正义;(3) 利益相关者的参与;以及 (4) 可持续性。此外,我们还将这些伦理要求应用到孕妇和哺乳期妇女的生命健康服务中。虽然我们的伦理框架是针对孕妇和哺乳期妇女的情况而设计的,但它可以为不同医疗保健领域向可操作的生命健康服务过渡提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Envisioning public health as a learning health system Thanks to our peer reviewers Learning health systems to implement chronic disease prevention programs: A novel framework and perspectives from an Australian health service The translation-to-policy learning cycle to improve public health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1