Machine Learning-based Analysis of Non-Invasive Measurements for Predicting Intracardiac Pressures

Annemiek E van Ravensberg, Niels T B Scholte, Aaram Omar Khader, Jasper J Brugts, N. Bruining, Robert M A van der Boon
{"title":"Machine Learning-based Analysis of Non-Invasive Measurements for Predicting Intracardiac Pressures","authors":"Annemiek E van Ravensberg, Niels T B Scholte, Aaram Omar Khader, Jasper J Brugts, N. Bruining, Robert M A van der Boon","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Early detection of congestion has demonstrated to improve outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. However, there is limited-access to invasively hemodynamic parameters to guide treatment. This study aimed to develop a model to estimate the invasively measured pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) using non-invasive measurements with both traditional statistics and machine learning (ML) techniques.\n \n \n \n The study involved patients undergoing right-sided heart catheterization at Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, from 2017 to 2022. Invasively measured PCWP served as outcomes. Model features included non-invasive measurements of arterial blood pressure, saturation, heart rate (variability), weight, and temperature. Various traditional and ML techniques were used, and performance was assessed with R² and AUC for regression and classification models, respectively.\n \n \n \n A total of 853 procedures were included of which 31% had HF as primary diagnosis and 49% had a PCWP of 12 mmHg or higher. The mean age of the cohort was 59 ± 14 years and 52% were male. The HRV had the highest correlation with the PCWP with a correlation of 0.16. All the regression models resulted in low R2 values of up to 0.04 and the classification models in AUC values of up to 0.59.\n \n \n \n In this study, non-invasive methods, both traditional and ML-based, showed limited correlation to PCWP. This highlights the weak correlation between traditional HF monitoring and hemodynamic parameters, also emphasizing the limitations of single non-invasive measurements. Future research should explore trend analysis and additional features to improve non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring, as there is a clear demand for further advancements in this field.\n","PeriodicalId":508387,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","volume":"21 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early detection of congestion has demonstrated to improve outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. However, there is limited-access to invasively hemodynamic parameters to guide treatment. This study aimed to develop a model to estimate the invasively measured pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) using non-invasive measurements with both traditional statistics and machine learning (ML) techniques. The study involved patients undergoing right-sided heart catheterization at Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, from 2017 to 2022. Invasively measured PCWP served as outcomes. Model features included non-invasive measurements of arterial blood pressure, saturation, heart rate (variability), weight, and temperature. Various traditional and ML techniques were used, and performance was assessed with R² and AUC for regression and classification models, respectively. A total of 853 procedures were included of which 31% had HF as primary diagnosis and 49% had a PCWP of 12 mmHg or higher. The mean age of the cohort was 59 ± 14 years and 52% were male. The HRV had the highest correlation with the PCWP with a correlation of 0.16. All the regression models resulted in low R2 values of up to 0.04 and the classification models in AUC values of up to 0.59. In this study, non-invasive methods, both traditional and ML-based, showed limited correlation to PCWP. This highlights the weak correlation between traditional HF monitoring and hemodynamic parameters, also emphasizing the limitations of single non-invasive measurements. Future research should explore trend analysis and additional features to improve non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring, as there is a clear demand for further advancements in this field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的非侵入性测量分析用于预测心内压
事实证明,早期发现充血可改善心力衰竭(HF)患者的预后。然而,用于指导治疗的无创血流动力学参数却很有限。本研究旨在利用传统统计学和机器学习(ML)技术,开发一种使用无创测量估算有创测得的肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)的模型。 该研究涉及2017年至2022年在鹿特丹伊拉斯谟医学中心接受右侧心导管检查的患者。有创测得的 PCWP 作为结果。模型特征包括动脉血压、饱和度、心率(变异性)、体重和体温的无创测量。使用了各种传统和 ML 技术,并分别以回归模型和分类模型的 R² 和 AUC 来评估性能。 共纳入了 853 例手术,其中 31% 的主要诊断为心房颤动,49% 的 PCWP 为 12 mmHg 或更高。组群的平均年龄为 59 ± 14 岁,52% 为男性。心率变异与 PCWP 的相关性最高,为 0.16。所有回归模型的 R2 值均较低,最高为 0.04,分类模型的 AUC 值最高为 0.59。 在这项研究中,传统的和基于 ML 的无创方法与 PCWP 的相关性都很有限。这凸显了传统高频监测与血液动力学参数之间的弱相关性,同时也强调了单一无创测量的局限性。未来的研究应探索趋势分析和其他功能,以改进无创血液动力学监测,因为这一领域显然需要进一步的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting early-stage coronary artery disease using machine learning and routine clinical biomarkers improved by augmented virtual data Why Thorough Open Data Descriptions Matters More Than Ever in the Age of AI: Opportunities for Cardiovascular Research Meet Key Digital Health thought leaders: Jagmeet (Jag) Singh Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year all-cause mortality in patients undergoing CRT implantation: Validation of the SEMMELWEIS-CRT score in the European CRT Survey I dataset Effect of Urban Environment on Cardiovascular Health: A Feasibility Pilot Study using Machine Learning to Predict Heart Rate Variability in Heart Failure Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1